Lenvatinib
DrugLenvatinib capsules administered orally at 14 mg/m^2 QD
Other names: MK-7902, E7080, LENVIMA
NCT Number: NCT04447755
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the antitumor activity and safety of lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) in children, adolescents, and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid malignancies after administration. Participants were enrolled into Ewing sarcoma (EWS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and Other Solid Tumors Excluding Osteosarcoma, diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma cohorts.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Hospital Universitario Austral ( Site 0126), Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Lenvatinib capsules administered orally at 14 mg/m^2 QD
Other names: MK-7902, E7080, LENVIMA
Time frame: Up to 16 weeks
ORR at Week 16 was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters [SOD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 at 16 Weeks. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: sum of products of diameters [SPD] decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study drug until the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (for HGG) or death (whichever occurs first).
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
BOR is defined as the participant's best confirmed response (CR or PR) over the treatment period as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1 or RANO. As per RECIST 1.1, CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first documented CR or PR to the date first documentation of progressive disease or death (whichever occurs first). As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. For participants with HGG, response will be assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall RANO response is based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
DCR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD). To be assigned a BOR of SD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented SD should be ≥7 weeks. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response was assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD <50% decreased from baseline, but <25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
CBR was defined as a BOR of CR or PR, or durable SD (Duration of SD should be ≥23 weeks since the first dose of the study treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. For participants with HGG, response is assessed according to RANO criteria whereby overall response was based on both radiographic response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value and SD: SPD <50% decreased from baseline, but <25% increased from nadir) and clinical performance status with steroid dose information.
Time frame: Up to approximately 50 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 38 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
A hedonic Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the supplemental Statistical Analysis Plan (sSAP), all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the taste category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the appearance category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the smell category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the mouth feel category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (cycle = 28 days)
A hedonic VAS was used to assess taste likability or "palatability" of a lenvatinib suspension formulated with water or apple juice. Participants scored each category on a scale from 1-7 ranging from super bad (score = 1) to super good (score = 7). As pre-specified by the sSAP, all participants who received suspension formulation were evaluated for palatability and acceptability of the suspension formulation, and data were summarized in an overall safety analysis set irrespective of tumor type. The palatability score based on the overall acceptability category is presented.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (0.5-4 and 6-10 hours post-dose), Cycle 1 Day 15 (pre-dose, 0.5-4, and 6-10 hours post-dose), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose). A cycle is 28 days.
Blood samples were taken predose and at specified times postdose on Days 1-28 to determine the AUCss of Lenvatinib.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Basket Study to Evaluate the Antitumor Activity and Safety of Lenvatinib in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Malignancies
Acronym: E7080-G000-231
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01778439
Disease Attributes, Pathologic Processes
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01134575
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Burkitt Lymphoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05927558
B-cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, Disease Attributes
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07727967
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Candidiasis
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details