Lemborexant
DrugLemborexant 10 mg tablet.
Other names: E2006
NCT Number: NCT04549168
The primary purpose of this study is to confirm using polysomnography (PSG) that lemborexant 10 milligram (mg) is superior to placebo on objective sleep onset as assessed by latency to persistent sleep (LPS) during the last 2 nights of 1 month of treatment in participants with insomnia disorder.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Beijing Tiantan Hosptial, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The study will have 2 phases: the Prerandomization Phase and the Randomization Phase. The Prerandomization Phase will comprise 3 periods that will last up to a maximum of 35 days: a Screening Period, a Run-in Period, and a Baseline Period. The Randomization Phase will comprise a Treatment Period during which participants will be treated for 30 nights (1 month) and a minimum 14-day Follow-up Period before an End of Study (EOS) Visit (up to 54 days). The total study duration for each participant on this study is 89 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in this study:
Exclusion criteria
Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study:
Lemborexant 10 mg tablet.
Other names: E2006
Placebo tablet matched to lemborexant 10 mg tablet.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 29 and 30
LPS was defined as the time in minutes from lights off to the first epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non- wakefulness as measured by polysomnography (PSG). Change from baseline to average LPS on Days 29 and 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 29 and 30
SE was defined as percentage (%) of time spent in bed asleep, calculated as total sleep time (TST) divided by interval from lights off until lights on as measured by PSG multiplied by 100. Change from baseline to average SE on Days 29 and 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Days 29 and 30
WASO was defined as minutes of wake from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on as measured by PSG. Change from baseline to average WASO on Days 29 and 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 24 to 30
sSOL was defined as estimated minutes from the time that the participant attempted to sleep until sleep onset. Change from baseline to average sSOL of Nights 24 to 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 24 to 30
sSE was defined as percentage of subjective total sleep time (sTST) divided by subjective time spent in bed, calculated as the interval from the time the participant reported attempting to sleep until the time participant stopped trying to sleep for the night (operationalized as the time the participant got out of bed for the day), and time spent asleep derived from subjective time spent in bed minus subjective wake after sleep onset (sWASO). WASO: estimated minutes of wake at night after initial sleep onset to time stopped trying to sleep for the night. Change from baseline to average sSE of Nights 24 to 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 24 to 30
sWASO was defined as sum of estimated minutes of wake during the night after initial sleep onset until the time the participant stopped trying to sleep for the night, operationalized as the time the participant got out of bed for the day. Change from baseline to average sWASO of Nights 24 to 30 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 1 and 2
LPS was defined as the time in minutes from lights off to the first epoch of 20 consecutive epochs of non- wakefulness as measured by polysomnography. Change from baseline to average LPS on Nights 1 and 2 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 1 and 2
SE was defined as percentage of time spent in bed asleep, calculated as total sleep time divided by interval from lights off until lights on as measured by PSG, multiplied by 100. Change from baseline to average SE on Nights 1 and 2 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, Nights 1 and 2
WASO was defined as minutes of wake from the onset of persistent sleep until lights on as measured by PSG. Change from baseline to average WASO on Nights 1 and 2 was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 44 days
A TEAE was defined as an AE with onset date on or after the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening (that is, participant was at immediate risk of death from AE as it occurred; this did not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form or was allowed to continue, might have caused death), required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect (in the child of a participant who was exposed to the study drug). The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 31
The ISI was a 7-item self-report questionnaire assessing the nature, severity, and impact of insomnia. The 7 dimensions evaluated are severity of: sleep onset; sleep maintenance; early-morning awakening problems; sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of the sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. A 5-point Likert scale is used to rate each item (from 0= no problem, 1= satisfied, 2= moderately satisfied, 3= dissatisfied and 4=very severe problem). Total ISI score was calculated as sum of scores of all 7 individual items, ranging between 0 to 28. A higher score indicated more severe illness. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 31
The ISI is a 7-item self-report questionnaire assessing the nature, severity, and impact of insomnia. The 4 dimensions out of 7 evaluated for daily functioning are severity of: sleep dissatisfaction; interference of sleep difficulties with daytime functioning; noticeability of the sleep problems by others; and distress caused by the sleep difficulties. A 5-point Likert scale is used to rate each item (from 0= no problem, 1= satisfied, 2= moderately satisfied, 3= dissatisfied and 4=very severe problem), Daytime Functioning score was calculated as sum of scores of item 4 to 7, ranging between 0 to 16. A higher score indicated more severe illness. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: First 3 nights (Nights 31 to 33), First 7 nights (Nights 31 to 37) and Last 7 nights (Nights 38 to 44) of Follow up Period
Rebound insomnia was defined as worsened sleep relative to screening after study drug treatment was completed. Sleep diary data from the follow-up period was compared to sleep diary data from the screening period to assess whether participants experience rebound insomnia. Number of participants with rebound insomnia assessed by sleep diary (sSOL and sWASO) was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Time frame: Baseline, First 7 mornings (Mornings 1 to 7) and Last 7 mornings (Mornings 24 to 30) of Treatment period; First 7 mornings (Mornings 31 to 37) and Last 7 mornings (Mornings 38 to 44) of Follow-up period
The Sleep Diary was used to assess subjective ratings of morning sleepiness with the following question: "How sleepy/alert do you feel this morning?" Participants rated their sleepiness/alertness level on a Likert scale from 1 to 9, with 1 being extremely poor (sleepy) and 9 being extremely good (alert). Higher score indicated better outcome. Change from baseline of the morning sleepiness item on the sleep diary for the average of first 7 mornings and the average of last 7 mornings of the Treatment Period; and the average of the first 7 mornings and the average of the last 7 mornings of the Follow-up Period was reported. The outcome measure was planned to be assessed for randomization phase only.
Eisai Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Chinese Subjects With Insomnia Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07277101
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04598672
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05665764
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03687086
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details