Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05223868

A Study of JNJ-77242113 in Participants With Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis

Th purpose of the study is to evaluate the dose response of JNJ-77242113 in efficacy at Week 16 in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Dermatrials Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The populations of people living with moderate to severe psoriasis is approximately 3.5 billion which are mostly managed with topical and conventional therapies. JNJ-77242113, investigational drug, targets the immune responses in the body and skin which impacts diseases, such as psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and this study evaluates JNJ-77242113 as options of advanced therapies in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The total duration of this study is up to 24 weeks which includes a screening period of less than or equal to (<=) 4 weeks, a 16-week treatment period, and a 4-week safety follow-up period. Safety will be assessed by adverse events (AEs), clinical safety laboratory assessments, electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs and physical examinations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant has a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis, with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA), for at least 6 months prior to the first administration of study intervention
  • Participant be a candidate for phototherapy or systemic treatment for plaque psoriasis
  • Participant has a total body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=)10 percent (%) at screening and baseline
  • Participant has a total Psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) >=12 at screening and baseline
  • Participant has a total Investigator global assessment (IGA) >=3 at screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (for example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Participant has current drug-induced psoriasis (for example, a new onset of psoriasis or an exacerbation of psoriasis from beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, or lithium)
  • Participant have previously received any other therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 23 receptor (IL-23R) (including but not limited to guselkumab, tildrakizumab, or risankizumab)
  • Participant has received any therapeutic agent directly targeted to interleukin 17 receptor (IL-17) or interleukin 12/23 receptor (IL-12/23) (including but not limited to secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, or ustekinumab) or has received anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha biologic therapy (including, but not limited to adalimumab) within 12 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, of the first administration of study intervention
  • Participant has received agents that deplete B cells (including, but not limited to, rituximab, or alemtuzumab) within 26 weeks of the first administration of study intervention

Treatment and study plan

JNJ-77242113

Drug

JNJ-77242113 tablet will be administered orally.

Placebo

Drug

Placebo tablet will be administered orally.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-75 score (greater than or equal to [>=] 75% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in PASI Total Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    Change from baseline in PASI total score at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-90) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-90 score (>=90% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (PASI-100) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved PASI-100 score (100% improvement from baseline in PASI) at Week 16 was reported. The PASI was a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body was divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas was assessed and scored separately for erythema, induration, and scaling, which were each rated on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=none, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe and 4 = very severe) and extent of involvement from 0 (indicated no involvement) to 6 (90% - 100% involvement). The PASI produced a numeric total score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (maximum psoriasis). Higher score indicated greater severity of psoriasis. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16

    Time frame: At Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 millimeters (mm); 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, greater than (>) 1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Higher score indicated more severe disease.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16

    Time frame: At Week 16

    The IGA assesses participant's plaque psoriasis. Lesions were graded for induration, erythema and scaling, each using a 5 point scale. Induration: 0 = no evidence of plaque elevation, 1 = minimal plaque elevation, = 0.25 mm; 2 = mild plaque elevation, = 0.5 mm; 3 = moderate plaque elevation, = 0.75 mm; 4 = severe plaque elevation, >1 mm; Erythema: 0 = no evidence of erythema, hyperpigmentation may be present, 1 = faint erythema, 2 = light red coloration, 3 = moderate red coloration, 4 = bright red coloration; Scaling: 0 = no evidence of scaling, 1 = minimal; occasional fine scale over less than 5% of the lesion, 2 = mild; fine scale dominates, 3 = moderate; coarse scale predominates, 4 = severe; thick, scale predominates. Final IGA score of psoriasis was based upon the average of induration, erythema and scaling scores assessed on a 5 point scale: cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). A higher score indicated more severe disease.

  6. Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

    A BSA was commonly used measure of severity of skin disease. It was defined as the percentage of surface area of the body involved with the condition being assessed, (that is, plaque psoriasis). BSA was assessed using hand print method where the surface area of the participant's hand including the palm and all 5 digits was used as a guide to estimate 1% BSA. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  7. Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) Symptoms Scores at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD symptoms scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  8. Change From Baseline in PSSD Signs Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

    Change from baseline in PSSD sign scores at Week 16 was reported. PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Symptoms Score Equal to (=) 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Symptoms Score Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 1

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily symptom score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 5 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that symptom score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PSSD Sign Score = 0 at Week 16 Among Participants With a Baseline Sign Score >=1

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) , Week 16

    The PSSD was a PRO questionnaire designed to measure the severity of psoriasis symptoms and signs for the assessment of treatment benefit. PSSD was a self-administered PRO instrument that included 11 items covering symptoms (itch, pain, stinging, burning and skin tightness) and participant observable signs (skin dryness, cracking, scaling, shedding or flaking, redness and bleeding) using 0 to 10 numerical rating scales for severity. Items were averaged on the daily sign score when at least 3 items (>=50 percentage of 6 items) on these scales are answered. The average value was converted into 0-100 scoring, such that sign score = average value*10, where, 0= least severe and 100= most severe. Higher score indicated more severe disease. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0 or 1 at Week 16 Among Participants With Baseline DLQI Score Greater Than (>) 1

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    The DLQI was a dermatology specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument designed to assess the impact of the disease on a participant's HRQoL. It was a 10-item questionnaire that assesses HRQoL over the past week and in addition to evaluating overall HRQoL, could be used to assess 6 different aspects that may affect quality of life: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school performance, personal relationships, and treatment. Each question was scored on a 4-point scale of 0 to 3 (0 = not at all, 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; or 3 = very much, where higher score indicated more impact on QoL). The total score was sum of scores from all 10 questions and it ranged from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much), with a higher score indicating greater impact on HRQoL. The baseline was defined as the closest measurement taken prior to or at the time of the first study drug administration date.

  12. Change From Baseline in Domain Scores of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often and 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score= worst pain. Each domain included 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; standard deviation (SD) of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score=more of concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance= worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function, social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 5-point Improvement From Baseline in Each PROMIS-29 Domain at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 16

    PROMIS-29, 29-item generic HRQoL survey, assesses each 7 PROMIS domains (depression; anxiety; physical function; pain interference; fatigue; sleep disturbance; ability to participate in social roles and activities) with 4 questions and pain intensity. Questions ranked on 5-point Likert Scale (1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=always). Pain intensity was rated on 11-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain). Higher score=worst pain. Each domain includes 4 items, plus a single pain intensity item totaling 29 items. Raw score of each PROMIS domain was converted into a standardized score with mean of 50; SD of 10 (T-Score). Higher PROMIS T-score= more of the concept being measured i.e. higher scores in anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference and sleep disturbance) indicated worse symptoms, higher scores in physical function and social roles= better functioning. Baseline: closest measurement taken prior to/at the time of first study drug administration date.

  14. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Time frame: From Week 0 through Week 20

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participants administered a product or medical device; the event needed not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE was defined as any event that occurred at or after the initial administration of study agent.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2b Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Acronym: FRONTIER 1

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 4, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.