Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04667104

A Study of JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs, and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy in terms of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels of the study intervention (that is, JNJ-73763989 + JNJ-56136379 + nucleos[t]ide analog [NA] and pegylated interferon alpha-2a [PegIFN-alpha2a]).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Bunkyō City, Japan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is an intervention specific appendix to the Hepatitis B wings platform trial (PLATFORMPAHPB2001). The study title reflects the original study design and JNJ-56136379 (JNJ-6379) was initially part of the study intervention but has been removed as part of amendment 3 of the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) positive or negative with suppressed viral replication under nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment for at least 6 months prior to screening
  • Medically stable based on physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at screening
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 35.0 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2), extremes included
  • Must have serum HBsAg greater than (>) 100 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) at screening, as assessed by quantitative HBsAg assay
  • Must have a fibroscan stiffness measurement less than or equal to (<=) 9.0 Kilopascal (kPa) at screening

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of hepatitis A, C, D or E virus infection or human immunodeficiency, virus type 1 (HIV) or HIV-2 infection at screening
  • History or evidence of clinical signs or symptoms of hepatic decompensation, including but not limited to: portal hypertension, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal varices
  • Evidence of liver disease of non-HBV etiology
  • Participants with a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening
  • Contraindications to the use of pegylated interferon alpha-2a

Treatment and study plan

JNJ-73763989

Drug

JNJ-73763989 injection will be administered subcutaneously once every 4 weeks.

Other names: JNJ-3989

Tenofovir disoproxil

Drug

Tenofovir disoproxil film-coated tablet will be administered orally once daily.

Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)

Drug

TAF film-coated tablet will be administered orally once daily.

Entecavir (ETV) monohydrate

Drug

ETV monohydrate film-coated tablet will be administered orally once daily.

PegIFN-alpha2a

Drug

PegIFN-alpha2a injection will be administered subcutaneously once weekly.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2 log10 International Unit/Millilitres (IU/mL) in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels From Baseline to Week 24

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24

    Percentage of participants with a reduction of at least 2 log10IU/mL in HBsAg levels from baseline to Week 24 were reported. A responder was defined as a participant with reduction of at least 2 log10 IU/mL in HBsAg levels from baseline at Week 24.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with TEAEs were reported. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or follow-up period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that had worsened since baseline.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or follow-up period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that had worsened since baseline. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

  3. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs (pulse rate, and blood pressure [systolic and diastolic]) were reported.

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Findings as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory findings (including hematology, blood biochemistry, and urinalysis) were reported. Only parameters in which any participant had abnormality are reported below.

  5. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to Week 28

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in 12- lead ECGs (heart rate, PR, QRS and QT corrected [QTc]) were reported.

  6. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination were reported.

  7. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Ophthalmic Examination as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24

    Number of participants with abnormalities in Ophthalmic examination were planned to be reported.

  8. Percentage of Participants Meeting the Protocol-defined Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at End of Study Intervention (EOSI)

    Time frame: At Week 24 (EOSI)

    Percentage of participants meeting the protocol-defined NA treatment completion criteria at EOSI were reported. NA treatment completion criteria are defined based on laboratory results at Week 24 were; HBsAg <10 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative; HBV DNA <20 IU/mL, that is, lower limit of quantification(LLOQ); alanine aminotransferase(ALT) <3*ULN.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Levels Below Different Cut-offs

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with HBeAg levels below different cut-offs were reported. The cut-offs for HBeAg levels were as followed:< 100 IU/mL, < 10 IU/mL, < 1 IU/mL, < LLOQ (0.11 IU/mL).

  10. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Below Different Cut-offs

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with HBsAg levels below different cut-offs were reported. The cut-offs for HBsAg level were: <1000 IU/mL, <100 IU/mL, <10 IU/mL, <1 IU/mL, <LLOQ (0.05 IU/mL).

  11. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Levels Below Different Cut-offs

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with HBV DNA levels below cut-offs were reported. The cut-offs for HBV DNA were as follows: <LLOQ (=20 IU/mL) target detected or not detected, < LLOQ target not detected, and < LLOQ target detected, <60 IU/mL, <100 IU/mL, <200 IU/mL, <1000 IU/mL, <2000 IU/mL, <20000 IU/mL.

  12. Percentage of Participants With ALT Levels Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3*ULN

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with ALT levels below >=3*ULN cut-off were reported.

  13. Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with HBeAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBeAg is defined as having achieved HBeAg seroclearance (as HBeAg level <LLOQ [0.11 IU/mL]) and appearance of anti-HBe antibodies, defined as baseline anti-HBe antibodies with a negative result and a post-baseline assessment with positive result.

  14. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion were reported. Seroconversion of HBsAg was defined as having achieved HBsAg seroclearance (defined as HBsAg <LLOQ [0.05 IU/mL]) and appearance of anti-HBs antibodies.

  15. Change From Baseline Over Time in HBsAg Levels

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24; Follow-Up: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Change from baseline over time in HBsAg levels were reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study agent.

  16. Change From Baseline Over Time in HBeAg Levels

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24; Follow-Up: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Change from baseline over time in HBeAg levels were reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study agent.

  17. Change From Baseline Over Time in HBV DNA Levels

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24; Follow-Up: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Change from baseline over time in HBV DNA levels were reported. The baseline assessment was defined as the last observed non-missing measurement before the date and time of the first administration of any of study agent.

  18. Time to First Occurrence of HBsAg Seroclearance

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Time to first occurrence of HBsAg seroclearance were reported in median time. Time to first occurrence of the HBsAg seroclearance was defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of first occurrence of the HBsAg seroclearance.

  19. Time to First Occurrence of HBeAg Seroclearance

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Time to first occurrence of HBeAg seroclearance were reported in median time. Time to first occurrence of the HBeAg seroclearance is defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of the first occurrence of the HBeAg seroclearance.

  20. Time to First Occurrence of HBV DNA < LLOQ

    Time frame: From Baseline (Day 1) up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Time to first occurrence of HBV DNA < LLOQ (20 IU/mL) were reported in median time. Time to first occurrence of the HBV DNA < LLOQ is defined as the number of days between the date of first study intervention intake and the date of the first occurrence of the HBV DNA < LLOQ.

  21. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of Participants with virologic breakthrough were reported. It was defined as confirmed on-treatment (the time period during which the participant received any of the study treatments) HBV DNA increase by >1 log10 IU/mL from nadir or confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA level >200 IU/mL in participants who had HBV DNA level <LLOQ (20 IU/mL) of the HBV DNA assay. Confirmed means that the criteria were fulfilled at 2 or more consecutive time points or at the last observed time point.

  22. Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance at Week 48 Without Re-starting NA Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 48 (24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 24)

    Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance at Week 48 (i.e., 24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 24) without re-starting NA treatment were reported. HBsAg seroclearance was defined as [quantitative] HBsAg <LLOQ (0.05 IU/mL).

  23. Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < LLOQ at Week 48 Without Re-starting NA Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 48 (24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 24)

    Percentage of participants with HBV DNA <LLOQ (20 IU/mL) at Week 48 (that is, 24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 24) without re-starting NA treatment were reported.

  24. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Flares

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with biochemical flares were reported. On-treatment biochemical flare was defined as confirmed ALT and/or AST >=3*ULN and >=3*nadir, while the participant received any of the study interventions. Off-treatment biochemical flare was defined as confirmed ALT and/or AST =3*ULN and =3*nadir, while the participants did not receive any of the study interventions (Off treatment, including NA).

  25. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Flares

    Time frame: Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Percentage of participants with virologic flares were reported. Virologic flare was defined as confirmed HBV DNA >peak threshold (lowest peak to qualify as virologic flare was HBV DNA >200 IU/mL) in participants who were off-treatment. Off-treatment was defined as the time period after stopping all study treatments (including NA) and had HBV DNA <LLOQ (20 IU/mL) at the last observed time point on all study interventions.

  26. Number of Participants Requiring NA Re-treatment

    Time frame: Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)

    Number of participants requiring NA re-treatment based on failure in NA treatment completion criteria (HBsAg <10 IU/mL, and HBeAg-negative, and HBV DNA < LLOQ (20 IU/mL), and ALT <3*ULN) were reported.

  27. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924)

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: Day 1 Week 1; Treatment Period 2: Day 1, Week 12

    The maximum observed plasma concentrations (Cmax) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) were reported.

  28. Plasma Concentration 24 Hours After Administration (C24h) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924)

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: Day 1 Week 1; Treatment Period 2: Day 1, Week 12

    Plasma concentration 24 hours (C24h) after administration of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) were reported.

  29. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924)

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: Day 1, Week 1; Treatment Period 2: Day 1, Week 12

    Time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) (Tmax) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) were reported.

  30. Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hour (AUC[0-24]h) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924)

    Time frame: Treatment Period 1: Day 1, Week 1; Treatment Period 2: Day 1, Week 12

    Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC[0-24]h) of JNJ-73763989 (JNJ-73763976 and JNJ-73763924) were reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Treatment With JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs, and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in Virologically Suppressed Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Acronym: PENGUIN

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.