Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03942042

A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants in Japan With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Erythrodermic Psoriasis

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug ixekizumab is safe and effective in participants with generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Present with GPP or EP based on an investigator-confirmed diagnosis and meet the associated criteria
  • GPP: Meet the criteria for GPP set by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) at screening and baseline regardless of IL-36 mutation status.
  • EP: Diagnosed to have BSA ≥80% involvement (with inflammatory erythema) at screening and baseline.
  • Candidates for phototherapy and/or systemic therapy
  • Men must agree to use a reliable method of birth control during the study
  • Women must agree to use birth control or remain abstinent during the study and for at least 12 weeks after stopping treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • History of drug-induced psoriasis
  • Concurrent or recent use of any biologic agent
  • Cannot avoid excessive sun exposure or use of tanning booths for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment and during the study
  • Have previously received ixekizumab
  • Serious disorder or illness other than psoriasis
  • Serious infection within the last 12 weeks
  • Breastfeeding or nursing (lactating) women

Treatment and study plan

Ixekizumab

Drug

Administered SC

Other names: LY2439821

Primary outcomes

  1. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants Who Improved Global Improvement Score (GIS) at Least 1 Point From Week 12 Through Week 20 and With ≤2 of GIS

    Time frame: Week 12 through Week 20

    GIS was assessed in the 4 grades by comparing the psoriatic findings: (1) resolved, (2) improved, (3) unchanged, or (4) worsened. The global improvement score was assessed based on the comparison of the psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants With GIS Grade 1: Resolved

    Time frame: Week 20

    GIS was assessed in the 4 grades by comparing the psoriatic findings: (1) resolved, (2) improved, (3) unchanged, or (4) worsened. The global improvement score was assessed based on the comparison of the psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline.

  2. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants With GIS Grade 2: Improved

    Time frame: Week 20

    GIS was assessed in the 4 grades by comparing the psoriatic findings: (1) resolved, (2) improved, (3) unchanged, or (4) worsened. The global improvement score was assessed based on the comparison of the psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline.

  3. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants With GIS Grade 3: Unchanged

    Time frame: Week 20

    GIS was assessed in the 4 grades by comparing the psoriatic findings: (1) resolved, (2) improved, (3) unchanged, or (4) worsened. The global improvement score was assessed based on the comparison of the psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline.

  4. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants With GIS Grade 4: Worsened

    Time frame: Week 20

    GIS was assessed in the 4 grades by comparing the psoriatic findings: (1) resolved, (2) improved, (3) unchanged, or (4) worsened. The global improvement score was assessed based on the comparison of the psoriatic findings, Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and other evaluations with those at the baseline.

  5. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants Who Achieved Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) of (0, 1)

    Time frame: Week 20

    The sPGA is a physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), or very severe (5). An sPGA assessed as either 0 or 1 represents a clinically meaningful response of minimal plaque severity or complete resolution of psoriasis.

  6. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least a 75% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI 75) Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI 75)

    Time frame: Week 20

    PASI combines assessments of the extent of body surface involvement in 4 regions (head & neck(h), trunk(t), arms(u), legs(l)) & severity of scaling (S), redness (R), & plaque induration/infiltration (thickness, T) in each region. Severity is rated for each index (R, S, T) on a 0-4 scale (0 for no involvement up to 4 for severe involvement): 0 = none, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe Fraction of total body surface area (BSA) affected is graded on a 0-6 scale (0 for no involvement to 6 for 90% - 100% involvement): 0 = 0% (clear), 1 = >0% to <10%, 2 = 10% to <30%, 3 = 30% to <50%, 4 = 50% to <70%, 5 = 70% to 90%, 6 = 90% to 100%.

    Overall score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (most severe disease).

  7. Maintenance Dosing Period: Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) in Participants With Scalp Involvement at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

    The scalp was assessed for erythema (redness), induration (hardness), and desquamation (shedding of skin) and percentage of area affected as follows:

    Erythema, Induration and Desquamation:

    0 = Absent

    • = Slight
    • = Moderate
    • = Severe
    • = Severest Possible

    Percent of Scalp Involved:

    • = <10%
    • = 10% - 29%
    • = 30% - 49%
    • = 50% - 69%
    • = 70% - 89%
    • = 90% - 100%

    The PSSI score is a composite score derived from the sum of the scores for erythema, induration and desquamation multiplied by the score for the extent of scalp area involved (percent of scalp involved). The range is 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (Most severe Disease).

  8. Maintenance Dosing Period: Change From Baseline in Percent of Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis Body Surface Area (BSA) Involvement of Psoriasis

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

    Percentage involvement of psoriasis on each participants body surface area was assessed by the investigator on a continuous scale from 0% (no involvement) to 100% (full involvement), in which 1% corresponds to the size of the participant's hand (including palm, fingers and thumb).

  9. Maintenance Dosing Period: Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

    The DLQI is a simple, patient-administered, 10-question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Response categories include "not at all", "a little","a lot", and "very much", with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Totals range from 0 to 30 (the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired) and a 5-point change from baseline is considered clinically relevant (Basra et al. 2008).

  10. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants Who Developed Treatment-Emergent Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies (TE-ADA)

    Time frame: Week 20

    Number of participants who developed treatment-emergent anti-ixekizumab antibodies (TE-ADA) was summarized by treatment group.

  11. Maintenance Dosing Period: Number of Participants Who Developed Neutralizing Anti-Ixekizumab Antibody (NAb)

    Time frame: Week 20

    Number of participants who developed neutralizing Anti-Ixekizumab antibody (NAb) was summarized by treatment group.

  12. Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Only: Change From Baseline on Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Severity Index

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 20

    GPP Severity Index was evaluated only for participants with pustular psoriasis at screening and at baseline. This is a composite score derived from the sum of scores for assessment of dermal symptoms, systemic symptoms, and laboratory findings (range, 0 to 17, with 17 representing severe symptoms). Skin symptoms were assessed by the score with the area of erythema (on a 0 to 3 scale), area of confluent pustules (on a 0 to 3 scale), and are of skin edema (on a 0 to 3 scale). The total score will be assessed (range, 0 to 9, with 9 representing severe symptoms). Systemic symptoms and laboratory findings were assessed by the score with fever (on a 0 to 2 scale), white blood cell (on a 0 to -2 scale), C-reactive protein (on a 0 to 2 scale) and Albumin (on a 0 to 2 scale). The total score will be assessed (range, 0 to 8, with 8 representing severe symptoms).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Post Marketing Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy And Safety Of Ixekizumab in Patients With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis and Erythrodermic Psoriasis

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
May 8, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.