methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
Drug120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv/month (starting dose)
Other names: Mircera; C.E.R.A
NCT Number: NCT00605293
This 2 arm study will compare the efficacy and safety of monthly administration of intravenous (IV) Mircera versus epoetin alfa for the maintenance of hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients with chronic renal anemia. Participants currently receiving maintenance treatment with epoetin alfa will be randomized either to receive monthly injections of 120, 200 or 360 micrograms Mircera, with the starting dose derived from the dose of epoetin alfa they were receiving in the week preceding study start, or to continue on epoetin alfa treatment. The anticipated duration of study is 32 weeks, and the target sample size is 146 participants.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Badajoz, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
120, 200 or 360 micrograms iv/month (starting dose)
Other names: Mircera; C.E.R.A
As prescribed
Time frame: EEP (Week 16 to 23)
Participants who maintained average Hb concentration within +/-1 g/dL of their reference Hb and between 10 to 12 g/dL during EEP are reported. The reference Hb value was defined on the basis of all assessments at Weeks -4, -3, -2, -1 and 0.
Time frame: SVP (Week -4 to -1), EEP (Week 16 to 23)
Change in Hb concentration between baseline SVP and the EEP was evaluated by subtracting the mean of Hb concentration during the SVP (Weeks -4 to -1) with the mean of Hb concentration during the EEP (Weeks 16 to 23).
Time frame: EEP (Week 16 to 23)
Participants who maintained Hb concentration between 10 to 12 g/dL throughout the EEP are reported.
Time frame: SVP (Week -4 to -1), DTP (Week 0 to 15), and EEP (Week 16 to 23)
Time frame: DTP (Week 0 to 15) and EEP (Week 16 to 23)
Time frame: DTP (Week 0 to 15) up to EEP (Week 16 to 23)
RBC transfusions could be given during the study in case of medical need, i.e., in severely anemic participants with recognized symptoms or signs of anemia (e.g., in participants with acute blood loss, with severe angina, or whose hemoglobin decreased to critical levels).
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
An Open Label Randomised Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-monthly Administration of Intravenous C.E.R.A. Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Maintenance of Haemoglobin Levels in Hemodialysis Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05750654
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03369210
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Aachen, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT01572506
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07708025
Anemia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Porto, Portugal
View Trial Details