Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03656744

A Study of HTD1801 in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study comparing multiple doses of HTD1801 to placebo.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Institute for Liver Health, Chandler, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This 18-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, proof of concept (POC), dose-ranging study compared multiple doses of HTD1801 to placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. Since accumulation of hepatic fat is considered the "first hit" in the pathogenesis of NASH (Adams and Angulo 2006), change in liver fat content (LFC) by magnetic resonance imaging estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) is an appropriate primary endpoint and is consistent with that used in other recent Phase 2 POC studies in NASH (Harrison et al., 2018, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 2018).

The Harrison et al., 2018, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals 2018 study showed clinically meaningful absolute and relative reductions in LFC assessed by MRI-PDFF over 12-week treatment periods thus, it was considered that an 18 week HTD1801 treatment period would therefore be adequate to assess the study's primary endpoint and to maximize collection of exposure and safety related data.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of NASH as assessed by MRI
  • Clinically documented diagnosis of T2DM
  • Body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

  • Liver disease unrelated to NASH
  • Poorly controlled T2DM or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence
  • Inability to undergo MRI for any reason
  • History of significant cardiovascular disease

Treatment and study plan

HTD1801

Drug

HTD1801 tablets, 250mg

Placebo

Drug

tablets manufactured to mimic HTD1801 tablets

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

    The primary endpoint was the absolute change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Fasting Glucose

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

    Change in fasting glucose from Baseline to Week 18 .

  2. Changes in Hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Changes in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 18.

  3. Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ≥ 30% Relative Reduction in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Proportion of subjects who achieved ≥ 30% relative reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

  4. Relative Change in LFC as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Relative change in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

  5. Number of Subjects Who Normalized LFC to <5% as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

    Number of subjects who normalized liver fat content (LFC) to <5% as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) at Week 18.

  6. Number of Subjects Who Achieved ≥5% Absolute Reduction in Liver Fat Content (LFC) as Measured by MRI-PDFF

    Time frame: Baseline through study Week 18

    Number of subjects who achieved ≥5% absolute reduction in liver fat content (LFC) as measured by magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) from Baseline to Week 18.

  7. Change in HOMA-IR

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) from Baseline to Week 18. The higher the HOMA-IR score, the more insulin resistant a person is. Values of <1 are considered optimal while values >2.9 indicate significant insulin resistance.

  8. Change in LDL-c

    Time frame: Baseline visit through study week 18

    Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

  9. Change in Serum Triglycerides

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in serum triglycerides from Baseline to Week 18.

  10. Change in HDL-c

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) from Baseline to Week 18.

  11. Change in AST

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Absolute change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) from Baseline to Week 18.

  12. Change in ALT

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Absolute change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from Baseline to Week 18.

  13. Proportion of Subjects With Elevated ALT at Baseline Who Normalized ALT at Week 18

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Proportion of subjects with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at Baseline who normalized ALT at Week 18.

  14. Change in Pro-Peptide of Type III Collagen (Pro-C3)

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in Pro-C3 from Baseline to Week 18 for subjects with elevated Pro-C3 at Baseline.

  15. Change in ELF Score

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. The ELF score is calculated using a published algorithm combining the values of a set of extracellular matrix markers, including TIMP-1, PIIINP, and HA. The ELF score has been reported to show good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease, with higher ELF scores associated with higher fibrosis stages. The ELF score is hence used as a prognostic marker for disease progression: ELF score < 9.8 : Low risk of progression, ELF score 9.8 to < 11.3 : Moderate risk of progression and ELF score > = 11.3 : High risk of progression.

  16. Change in TIMP-1

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) from Baseline to Week 18.

  17. Change in PIIINP

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (PIIINP) from Baseline to Week 18.

  18. Change in HA

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in hyaluronic acid (HA) from Baseline to Week 18.

  19. Change in Total Bile Acids

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Changes in total bile acids from Baseline to Week 18.

  20. Change in FGF19

    Time frame: Baseline through study week 18

    Change in fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) from Baseline to Week 18

  21. Number of Participants Reporting an Adverse Events From Baseline Through Week 18

    Time frame: Adverse events were collected from the time the subject signed the informed consent form through the date of the last visit for a specific subject, that is, approximately 24 weeks in total for a completed subject.

    AEs were mapped to MedDRA version 20.1 preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC). If the subject experienced multiple events that mapped to a single preferred term, the greatest severity grade according to CTCAE Version 4.0, and strongest investigator assessment of relation to study medication was assigned to the preferred term. If an event had a missing severity or relationship, it was classified as having the highest severity and/or strongest relationship to study medication. The occurrence of TEAEs was summarized by treatment group by SOC, PT, and severity. Separate summaries of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs related to study drug, severe or life threatening TEAEs, and TEAEs leading to the discontinuation of study treatment were generated. Additionally, the occurrence of liver-specific AEs was summarized by treatment group. All reported adverse events were listed for individual subjects showing verbatim term, PT and SOC.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

HighTide Biopharma Pty Ltd

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Proof-of-Concept and Dose-Ranging Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of HTD1801 in Adults With NASH and T2DM

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 4, 2018
Registry last updated
Dec 29, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.