Placebo
DrugPlacebo oral solution (0 milligrams [mg]/mL CBD) contained the excipients sesame oil, ethanol, sucralose, and strawberry flavoring.
Other names: Placebo control
NCT Number: NCT02006628
A study to compare the change in symptom severity in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder when treated with GWP42003 or placebo in conjunction with existing anti-psychotic therapy over a period of six weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Czeladź, Poland
This eight-week (six-week treatment period and two-week follow-up), multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GWP42003 in participants with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder.
Eligible participants entered the study at a Screening and Randomization Visit (Day 1), where eligibility was established. Once all inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed, participants were randomized to receive either GWP42003 or placebo in conjunction with their prescribed anti-psychotic medications and began treatment on Day 1 as instructed. Assessments were performed on Days 8, 22, and 43. A safety follow-up visit was conducted on Day 57.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(all must be fulfilled):
Exclusion criteria
(any of the following):
i. delirium or dementia. ii. acute drug induced psychosis. iii. bipolar disorder.
Placebo oral solution (0 milligrams [mg]/mL CBD) contained the excipients sesame oil, ethanol, sucralose, and strawberry flavoring.
Other names: Placebo control
GWP42003 was an oral solution containing 100 mg/mL CBD dissolved in the excipients sesame oil, ethanol, sucralose and strawberry flavoring.
Other names: Cannabidiol
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The PANSS was a 30-item medical scale completed by a trained rater that assessed the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia as well as symptoms of general psychopathology. The PANSS Total score was derived from the sum of the 30 items, which were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total score is the summed total for each of the PANSS positive symptom ('P'), negative symptom ('N'), general psychopathology symptom ('G') scores and could range from 30 to 210 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The percentage of PANSS treatment responders, defined as participants with ≥20% improvement in PANSS Total score between baseline and End of Treatment, is presented. The percentage of participants was calculated by dividing the number of participants with a ≥20% improvement in PANSS Total score (yes) by the total number of participants.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The PANSS 'P' scale measured the severity of positive symptoms, including delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinations, hyperactivity, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'P' score could range from 7 to 49 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The PANSS 'N' scale measured the severity of negative symptoms, including blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, and stereotyped thinking. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'N' score could range from 7 to 49 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The PANSS 'G' scale measured the severity of general psychopathology symptoms, including somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgement and insight, disturbance of violation, poor impulse control, preoccupation, and active social avoidance. Individual items were rated on a 7-point scale, where 1 = absent and 7 = extreme. The total 'G' score could range from 16 to 112 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The SANS assessed 5 symptom complexes to obtain clinical ratings of negative symptoms in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. Symptom complexes were affective blunting, alogia (impoverished thinking), avolition/apathy, anhedonia/asociality, and disturbance of attention. Assessments were conducted on a 6-point scale (0 = not at all; 5 = severe). The total score could range from 0 to 125 points, with lower scores equating to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The CGI-S was a 7-point scale that required the clinician to rate the severity of a participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience of participants who had the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, participants were assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating on the following scale: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; or 7 = extremely ill. Lower scores equated to milder severity of symptoms, that is, closer to psychologically normal.
Time frame: Day 8 through Day 43
The CGI-I was a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much a participant's illness had improved or worsened relative the first assessment at the beginning of the intervention. This was rated on the following scale: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; or 7 = very much worse. Lower scores equated to improvement of symptoms.
Time frame: Day 1 through Day 43
The BACS was an instrument used to assess the aspects of cognition found to be most impaired and most strongly correlated with outcome in participants with schizophrenia or related psychotic disorder. The BACS consisted of 6 domains: verbal memory (score range 0 to 75), working memory (score range 0 to 28), motor speed (score range 0 to 100), verbal fluency (score > 0, with no set maximum value), attention and speed of information processing (score range 0 to 110), and executive functions (score range 0 to 22). A score was obtained for each of the 6 domains. A composite summary score was then calculated as the arithmetic mean of the unweighted scores from the 6 domains. While there was not an upper limit on the composite score, overall, an increase in score was indicative of an improvement in cognition.
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study of GWP42003 as Adjunctive Therapy in the First Line Treatment of Schizophrenia or Related Psychotic Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03338179
Aging, Mental Disorders
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05838573
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05304767
Mental Disorders, Schizophrenia
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00004571
Mental Disorders, Normal Physiology
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details