Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05197049

A Study of Guselkumab Subcutaneous Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in participants with Crohn's disease.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) of at least 3 months in duration
  • Have moderate to severe CD as assessed by CDAI, stool frequency, and abdominal pain score, and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD).
  • Demonstrated intolerance or inadequate response to conventional or to biologic therapy for CD

Exclusion criteria

  • Current diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis
  • Complications of Crohn's disease that require surgical intervention or confound efficacy assessments
  • Unstable doses of concomitant Crohn's disease therapy

Treatment and study plan

Guselkumab dose 1

Drug

Guselkumab (Dose 1) will be administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection.

Guselkumab dose 2

Drug

Guselkumab (Dose 2) will be administered by SC injection.

Guselkumab dose 3

Drug

Guselkumab (Dose 3) will be administered by SC injection.

Placebo

Drug

Placebo will be administered by SC injection.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score <150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 (improvement in disease activity) to 600 (more disease activity) and a decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopic Response at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved endoscopic response at Week 12 were reported. Endoscopic response was defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement from baseline in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) score. SES-CD evaluated 4 endoscopic components (presence and size of ulcer, extent of ulcerated surface, extent of affected surface, and presence and type of narrowing) across 5 ileocolonic segments (ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left colon, and rectum), each scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for each segment except narrowing component for which the maximum total score (that is, stricturing) was 11 points. The total SES-CD score was the sum of all the component scores across all the segments and it ranged from 0 (best) to 56 (worst), where higher scores indicated more severe disease.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 24

    Time frame: At Week 24

    Percentage of participants who achieved clinical remission at Week 24 were reported. Clinical remission was defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score <150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 (improvement in disease activity) to 600 (more disease activity) and a decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Patient-reported Outcome (PRO)-2 Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants who achieved PRO-2 remission at Week 12 were reported. PRO-2 remission was defined as an abdominal pain (AP) mean daily score <=1, and stool frequency (SF) mean daily score <=3, and no worsening of AP or SF from baseline. Mean daily AP score based on the CDAI was defined as the sum of abdominal pain/cramps ratings in the previous 7 days in a diary card divided by the total number of days assessments were performed. Average daily SF score based on the CDAI was defined as the sum of number of liquid or very soft stools in the previous 7 days in a diary card divided by the total number of days assessments were performed. Mean daily SF and AP scores at a scheduled visit were not calculated if total number of days of assessment was less than 5. Higher PRO-2 scores indicated more severe disease.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Response at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in CDAI score >= 100 points or CDAI score < 150. The multi-item CDAI score assessed severity of illness by collecting information on 8 different Crohn's disease-related variables (extraintestinal manifestations, abdominal mass, weight, hematocrit, use of antidiarrheal drug(s) and/or opiates, total number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain/cramps, and general well-being). The last 3 variables were scored over 7 days by the participant on a diary card. The total CDAI score ranged from 0 (improvement in disease activity) to 600 (more disease activity) and a decrease in total CDAI score over time indicates improvement in disease activity.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Week 48

    Time frame: Placebo, Guselkumab 400 mg + 100 mg, and Guselkumab 400 mg + 200 mg: From Week 0 up to Week 48; Placebo arm subset - Rescue Treatment: From Week 16 up to Week 48

    Percentage of participants with TEAEs through Week 48 were reported. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE that occurred at or after the initial administration of study drug (Week 0) through data cutoff of Week 48 was considered treatment-emergent.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) Through Week 48

    Time frame: Placebo, Guselkumab 400 mg + 100 mg, and Guselkumab 400 mg + 200 mg: From Week 0 up to Week 48; Placebo arm subset - Rescue Treatment: From Week 16 up to Week 48

    Percentage of participants with TESAEs through Week 48 were reported. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant resulting in any of the following outcomes or was deemed significant for any other reason: death, life-threatening (immediate risk of dying), initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. Any SAE that occurred at or after the initial administration of study drug (Week 0) through the data cutoff of Week 48 was considered treatment-emergent.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug Through Week 48

    Time frame: Placebo, Guselkumab 400 mg + 100 mg, and Guselkumab 400 mg + 200 mg: From Week 0 up to Week 48; Placebo arm subset - Rescue Treatment: From Week 16 up to Week 48

    Percentage of participants with TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug through Week 48 were reported. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant participating in a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE that occurred at or after the initial administration of study drug (Week 0) through data cutoff of Week 48 was considered treatment-emergent.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab Subcutaneous Induction Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Acronym: GRAVITI

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jan 19, 2022
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.