Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04683029

A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Systemic Sclerosis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Chukyo Hospital, Aichi, Japan

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2013 criteria
  • Diffuse cutaneous SSc according to the LeRoy criteria that is, skin fibrosis proximal to the elbows and knees in addition to acral fibrosis
  • Disease duration of ≤36 months (defined as time from first non-Raynaud phenomenon manifestation).
  • Greater than or equal to (>=) 10 and less than or equal to (<=) 22 modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) units at screening and Week 0
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) >= 60 percent (%) of predicted at screening
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >= 40% of predicted (hemoglobin-corrected) at screening.
  • Participants who meet 1 of the following criteria at screening: increase of >=3 mRSS units, compared with an assessment performed within the previous 2 to 6 months; Involvement of 1 new body area with an increase of >=2 mRSS units compared with an assessment performed within the previous 2 to 6 months; and Involvement of 2 new body areas with increase of >=1 mRSS units compared with the assessment within the previous 2 to 6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • History of liver or renal insufficiency (estimated creatinine clearance below 60 milliliter per minute [mL/min]); significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has any known severe or uncontrolled SSc complications including hemoptysis, pulmonary hemorrhage, renal crisis
  • Has an interstitial lung disease requiring oxygen therapy
  • Has any rheumatic disease other than SSc such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), systemic lupus erythematosus, polymyositis/dermatomyositis that could interfere with assessment of SSc
  • Has a current diagnosis or signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances. (or, in the investigator's opinion, any other concomitant medical condition that places the participant at risk by participating in this study)

Treatment and study plan

Guselkumab dose 1

Drug

Guselkumab Dose 1 will be administered intravenously.

Guselkumab dose 2

Drug

Guselkumab Dose 2 will be administered subcutaneously.

Placebo

Drug

Placebo will be administered intravenously or subcutaneously.

Primary outcomes

  1. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Change from baseline in mRSS at Week 24 was reported. The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the thickening of the skin using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in the fingers, hands, forearms, arms, feet, legs, and thighs (bilaterally) and face, chest, and abdomen (singly). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (no thickening) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    Change from baseline in mRSS at Week 52 was reported. The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the thickening of the skin using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in the fingers, hands, forearms, arms, feet, legs, and thighs (bilaterally) and face, chest, and abdomen (singly). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (no thickening) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome.

  2. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Worsening of Modified Rodnan Skin Score at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Week 24 and Week 52

    The percentage of participants who experienced worsening of mRSS at Week 24 and Week 52 was reported. The worsening of mRSS was defined as an increase from baseline greater than or equal to (>=) 5 points and >=20 percent (%) in mRSS. The mRSS is an accepted clinical measure of skin thickness. The investigator assessed the thickening of the skin using the mRSS through simple palpation on 17 different skin sites in the fingers, hands, forearms, arms, feet, legs, and thighs (bilaterally) and face, chest, and abdomen (singly). Each skin site was rated on a 0 to 3 scale; where 0 = normal skin, 1 = mild thickness, 2 = moderate thickness, and 3 = severe thickness and unable to pinch. Individual skin scores in the 17 body areas were summed and defined as the total mRSS which ranged from 0 (no thickening) to 51 (severe thickening), where higher score indicated more severity of skin thickening/worst outcome.

  3. Main Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0.6 in American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (ACR CRISS) at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Week 24 and Week 52

    ACR CRISS is a composite endpoint. Firstly, participants were evaluated on not-improved criterion: new onset of renal crisis, >=15% decline in forced vital capacity [FVC] percent predicted relative to baseline, new onset of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and new onset of left ventricular failure. If yes, these participants were assigned probability score of 0.0. For remaining participants, percentage was based on CRISS domains: mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability-Index (HAQ-DI). Algorithm determines predicted probability of improvement from baseline by incorporating change in mRSS, FVC percent predicted, physician and patient global assessments and HAQ-DI. Outcome was a continuous variable between 0.0 and 1.0 (0 to 100%). Higher score=greater probability of improvement. ACR CRISS score >=0.60 was considered improved, while predicted probability below 0.60 was considered not improved.

  4. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    FVC was the total amount of air (in liters) exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying interstitial lung disease.

  5. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Percent Predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    Change from baseline in the percent predicted FVC at Week 24 and Week 52 was reported. FVC was the total amount of air (in liters) exhaled from the lungs during the lung function test measured by spirometer which assessed the change in lung function related to the disease status of an underlying interstitial lung disease.

  6. Main Study: Change From Baseline in the Measured Absolute Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    DLCO is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. DLCO is measured using the single breath method. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath.

  7. Main Study: Change From Baseline in the Percent Predicted Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    Change from baseline in the percent predicted DLCO at Week 24 and Week 52 was reported. DLCO is a measurement of the ability of the lungs to transfer gases from the air to the blood. DLCO is measured using the single breath method. Participants breathe in (inhale) air containing a very small, harmless amount of a tracer gas, such as carbon monoxide. Participants hold their breath for 10 seconds, then rapidly blow it out (exhale). The exhaled gas was tested to determine amount of the tracer gas absorbed during the breath.

  8. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Digital Ulcer Counts at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    Digital ulcers were defined as a full thickness (>3 millimeters [mm] in maximal diameter) skin lesion with loss of epithelium including lesions covered by eschar (excluding pitting scars and hyperkeratotic lesions). Healing was defined by re-epithelialization with loss of pain and exudate. The digital ulcer assessments and counting were performed by the investigator designee.

  9. Main Study: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 and Week 52

    HAQ-DI assessed the degree of difficulty participants experienced in 8 daily living activity domains during past week: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each activity category consisted of 2-3 items. For each item, level of difficulty was scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, 3=unable to do). Total HAQ-DI score was computed as the sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered, providing a score from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicated greater disability.

  10. Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24 and Week 52

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs that occur at or after the initial administration of study intervention. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events are reported in this outcome measure.

  11. Long-term Extension (LTE) Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: From Week 52 up to Week 112

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were defined as AEs that occurred at or after the initial administration of study intervention. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events are reported in this outcome measure.

  12. Main Study: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) Through Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24 and Week 52

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs were defined as AEs that occur at or after the initial administration of study intervention.

  13. Long-term Extension (LTE) Period: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Time frame: From Week 52 up to Week 112

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death, was life threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/ incapacity, or resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs were defined as AEs that occur at or after the initial administration of study intervention.

  14. Main Study: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Through Week 24 and Week 52

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 24 and Week 52

    AESI were defined as any newly identified malignancy or case of active tuberculosis (TB) or interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurring after the first study intervention administration in study participants and was reported by the investigator to the sponsor or designee within 24 hours after being made aware of the event. AESIs for this study included drug-induced liver injuries, active TB, ILD, hypersensitivity reaction, opportunistic infection and adverse cardiovascular events.

  15. Long-term Extension (LTE) Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    Time frame: From Week 52 up to Week 112

    AESI were defined as any newly identified malignancy or case of active tuberculosis (TB) or interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurring after the first study intervention administration in study participants and was reported by the investigator to the sponsor or designee within 24 hours after being made aware of the event. AESIs for this study included drug-induced liver injuries, active TB, ILD, hypersensitivity reaction, opportunistic infection and adverse cardiovascular events.

  16. Main Study: Serum Concentration of Guselkumab

    Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 and Post- dose at Weeks 0, 4, 8

    Serum concentration of guselkumab was reported. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for guselkumab was 0.01 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).

  17. Long-term Extension (LTE) Study: Serum Concentrations of Guselkumab

    Time frame: Pre-dose (at Weeks 56, 60, 64, 76, 88, 96) and Week 104

    Serum concentration of guselkumab was reported. The LLOQ for guselkumab was 0.01 mcg/mL.

  18. Main Study: Number of Participants With Anti-Guselkumab Antibody

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) up to Week 52

    Number of participants with anti-guselkumab antibody were reported. Serum samples were assessed for anti-drug antibodies.

  19. Long-term Extension (LTE) Study: Number of Participants With Anti-guselkumab Antibody

    Time frame: From Week 52 up to Week 104

    Number of participants with anti-guselkumab antibody were reported. Serum samples were assessed for anti-drug antibodies.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Proof-of-concept Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Systemic Sclerosis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.