The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, China
NCT Number: NCT07599423
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glofitamab in combination with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GemOx) versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) who have relapsed early (within 1 year) or are primary refractory to first-line therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the Glofitamab-GemOx combination regimen or SOC. The SOC arm consists of investigator's choice of salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for eligible patients. The primary endpoint of the study is event-free survival (EFS).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A single 1000 mg dose is administered intravenously as pretreatment on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (7 days prior to the first glofitamab dose) to deplete peripheral B-cells and mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS).
Glofitamab is administered intravenously using a step-up dosing schedule to mitigate CRS:
Cycle 1 Day 8: 2.5 mg. Cycle 1 Day 15: 10 mg. Cycle 2-12 Day 1: 30 mg (target dose). Treatment continues for a maximum of 12 cycles (21-day cycles) or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity.
Administered intravenously at 1000 mg/m² on Day 2 of Cycle 1, and then on Day 1 or 2 of subsequent cycles (Cycles 2-8).
Administered intravenously at 100 mg/m² on Day 2 of Cycle 1, and then on Day 1 or 2 of subsequent cycles (Cycles 2-8).
Participants in the SOC arm will receive up to 2 cycles of investigator's choice salvage therapy among the following regimens: ICE ± R, DHAP ± R, GDP ± R, ESHAP ± R, GemOx ± R, or MINE ± R .
Participants in the SOC arm who achieve a CR or PR after salvage therapy will proceed to ASCT. This includes a conditioning regimen (e.g., BEAM) followed by autologous stem cell rescue and a recovery period.
Time frame: From randomization until the first occurrence of an EFS event (disease progression, new therapy, or death), assessed up to approximately 48 months.
EFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date of disease progression according to the Lugano Classification (2014), commencement of new anti-lymphoma therapy, or death from any cause, as determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From randomization to the end of study, up to approximately 48 months.
The proportion of participants whose best overall response is a CR on PET/CT or diagnostic CT during the study, as determined by the investigator according to the 2014 Lugano Response Criteria.
Time frame: From randomization to the end of study, up to approximately 48 months.
The proportion of participants whose best overall response is a Partial Response (PR) or a Complete Response (CR) during the study, as determined by the investigator according to the 2014 Lugano Response Criteria.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 48 months.
The time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression according to the 2014 Lugano Response Criteria or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, as determined by the investigator.
Time frame: From the date of first documented objective response until disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 48 months.
The time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (CR or PR) to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From the date of first documented CR until disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 48 months.
The time from the first occurrence of a documented CR to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: From randomization until death, assessed up to approximately 48 months.
The time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: From the initiation of study treatment up to 35 days after the final dose or initiation of new anti-lymphoma therapy, with long-term monitoring for specific AEs, assessed up to approximately 48 months.
Safety and tolerability evaluated by the incidence and severity of AEs. Severity is determined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v5.0). Specific events such as CRS, Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), and Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) will be graded according to ASTCT criteria.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 48 months.
The EORTC QLQ-C30 assesses 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, a global health/quality of life (QoL) scale, and 6 single items. The first 28 items are scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). The final 2 global health/QoL items are scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). Higher scores on the global health/QoL and functional scales indicate a better level of functioning and better HRQoL (a better outcome). Conversely, higher scores on the symptom scales/items indicate higher symptom severity (a worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 48 months.
The FACT-Lym LymS assesses health-related quality of life aspects relevant to lymphoma patients using a 15-item lymphoma-specific symptoms scale. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). Higher total scores are indicative of better health-related quality of life (a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 48 months.
The EQ-5D-5L is a health status questionnaire containing a five-item descriptive system (assessing mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS measures the patient's self-rated health on a vertical scale ranging from 0 ("worst imaginable health state") to 100 ("best imaginable health state"). A published weighting system is used to create a single composite score of the patient's health status. Higher scores on the VAS and the composite utility score indicate a better health status (a better outcome).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Other
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Glofitamab in Combination With Gemcitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07735533
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma
View Trial DetailsNCT07713459
CAR T Cell Therapy, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
View Trial DetailsNCT07652476
Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Ancona, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07638982
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Digestive System Diseases
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details