gantenerumab
DrugParticipants received Gantenerumab at 105 mg , 225 mg, or at doses up to 1200 mg SC injection Q4W.
NCT Number: NCT01224106
This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study will evaluate the effect of gantenerumab (RO4909832) on cognition and functioning and the safety and pharmacokinetics in participants with prodromal Alzheimer's Disease. Participants will be randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) injections of either gantenerumab or placebo. Participants who consent to be part of the sub study will undergo positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to assess brain amyloid. The anticipated time on study treatment is 104 weeks in Part 1, with an option for an additional up to 2 years of treatment in Part 2, followed by an open-label extension (Part 3) until July 2020.
The dosing for Parts 1 and 2 was stopped after a planned futility interim analysis showed a low probability of meeting the primary outcome measure with the doses studied. The study has converted to open-label to investigate higher gantenerumab doses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
ALPI-Inst. de Rehabilitacion Marcelo Fitte, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Additional inclusion criteria for sub study:
Exclusion criteria
Additional exclusion criteria for sub study:
Participants received Gantenerumab at 105 mg , 225 mg, or at doses up to 1200 mg SC injection Q4W.
Participants received Placebo SC injection Q4W.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating) is obtained through semi-structured interviews of participants and informants, and cognitive functioning is rated in six domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Each domain is rated on a five-point scale of functioning as follows: 0, no impairment; 0.5, questionable impairment; 1, mild impairment; 2, moderate impairment; and 3, severe impairment. The CDR-SOB (Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes) is based on summing each of the domain box scores with total scores ranging from 0-18, where lower total scores represent better outcomes and higher total scores represent worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline up until a maximum of 5 years
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The ADAS-Cog-11 assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, comprehension, praxis, orientation, and spontaneous speech. Most of these are assessed by tests although some are rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale. The score range for ADAS-Cog-11 is from 0 to 70 with higher scores representing severe dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Time to Onset of Dementia was defined as the time interval between the first treatment date and the date that participant is assessed as having Alzheimer-type dementia by investigators.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) ® is a cognitive test battery that incorporates a variety of executive and memory tasks in order to assess neuropsychological function. The end outcome as reported below, is a Z-Composite Score. The score range of the Z-Composite Score is from (-) infinity to (+) infinity with a score of zero representing the population mean, lower (negative) scores representing poorer cognitive outcomes and higher (positive) scores representing better cognitive outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
FCSRT assesses verbal episodic memory. Performances in free recalls, cued recalls and in a recognition task were analyzed, as the process of encoding is controlled. Participants were asked to remember a list of 16 words. Three tasks of free and cued recalls, as well as 1 recognition task and one delayed recall give the scores. Total recall was obtained by the addition of cued recalls to free recalls. Maximum score is 48 for immediate: 16 words multiplied by (*) 3 corresponding to immediate free recall + immediate cued recall + immediate recognition test. Maximum score is 64 (better score) when delayed recall: 16 words*4. The minimum score is 0 (worse).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Participants completed the FAQ for physical function. Overall scores ranged from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent) where lower scores represented an improvement in physical function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The CDR-GS represents a semi-structured interview which rates impairment in 6 categories (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care) on a 5-point scale in which CDR 0 = no dementia and CDR 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 = questionable, mild, moderate or severe dementia respectively. The range in scores for the CDR-GS is from 0 to 3 and a high score on the CDR-GS would indicate a high disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The NPI is a retrospective (to 1 month) caregiver-informant interview assessing frequency and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains. The NPI score is based on the sum of the severity ratings (0=absent, 1=mild, 3=severe). The 12 symptom domains include delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, euphoria/elation, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behaviors, nighttime behavioral disturbances, and appetite/eating abnormalities. The NPI severity score is based on severity ratings (0=absent, 1=mild to 3=severe).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
CSF biomarker phospho-tau (p-tau) is an indicator of neuronal injury and neurodegeneration. An elevation in levels of tau, as well as specific p-tau species, is thought to be a marker for progressive cellular degeneration in AD.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
Change from baseline in hippocampal right volume (HRV) and hippocampal left volume (HLV) were analysed at Week 104 using magnetic resonance imaging.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The different regions of the brain that were analyzed included cerebellum gray, whole cerebellum, composite white matter, subcortical white matter, pons and composite reference.
Time frame: Pre-Dose: Weeks 8, 20, 44, 68 and 100; Post-Dose: Weeks 1, 53 and 101
The PK analyses includes tabulation of plasma concentration data and summarisation of plasma concentrations by visits with participants grouped according to treatment received. Descriptive summary statistics for the Arithmetic Mean and Standard Deviation are presented below.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 104
The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline up until a maximum of 4.5 years
An Adverse Event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time frame: Baseline up until a maximum of 4.5 years
Participants were considered positive or negative for ADA based on their baseline and post-baseline sample results. The number and percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels were determined for Gantenerumab and Placebo groups. The prevalence of ADA at baseline was calculated as the proportion of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels at baseline relative to the total number of participants with a sample available at baseline. The incidence of treatment-emergent ADAs was determined as the proportion of participants with confirmed post-baseline positive ADAs relative to the total number of participants that had at least one post-baseline sample available for ADA analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The ADAS-Cog-11 assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, comprehension, praxis, orientation, and spontaneous speech. Most of these are assessed by tests although some are rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale. The score range for ADAS-Cog-11 is from 0 to 70 with higher scores representing severe dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating) is obtained through semi-structured interviews of participants and informants, and cognitive functioning is rated in six domains of functioning: memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. Each domain is rated on a five-point scale of functioning as follows: 0, no impairment; 0.5, questionable impairment; 1, mild impairment; 2, moderate impairment; and 3, severe impairment. The CDR-SOB (Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes) is based on summing each of the domain box scores with total scores ranging from 0-18, where lower total scores represent better outcomes and higher total scores represent worse outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The ADAS-Cog-13 assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, comprehension, praxis, orientation, and spontaneous speech. The score range for ADAS-Cog-13 is from 0 to 85 with higher scores representing severe dysfunction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
Time to Onset of Dementia was defined as the time interval between the first treatment date and the date that participant is assessed as having Alzheimer-type dementia by investigators.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
FCSRT assesses verbal episodic memory. Performances in free recalls, cued recalls and in a recognition task were analyzed, as the process of encoding is controlled. Participants were asked to remember a list of 16 words. Three tasks of free and cued recalls, as well as 1 recognition task and one delayed recall give the scores. Total recall was obtained by the addition of cued recalls to free recalls. Maximum score is 48 for immediate: 16 words multiplied by (*) 3 corresponding to immediate free recall + immediate cued recall + immediate recognition test. Maximum score is 64 (better score) when delayed recall: 16 words*4. The minimum score is 0 (worse).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
Participants completed the FAQ for physical function. Overall scores ranged from 0 (independent) to 30 (dependent) where lower scores represented an improvement in physical function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The CDR-GS represents a semi-structured interview which rates impairment in 6 categories (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care) on a 5-point scale in which CDR 0 = no dementia and CDR 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 = questionable, mild, moderate or severe dementia respectively. The range in scores for the CDR-GS is from 0 to 3 and a high score on the CDR-GS would indicate a high disease severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 152
Change from baseline in hippocampal right volume (HRV) and hippocampal left volume (HLV) were analysed at Week 152 using magnetic resonance imaging.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The regions of the brain that were analyzed included cerebellum gray and composite reference.
Time frame: Pre-Dose: Weeks 64, 100, 104, 136, 156 and 208; Post-Dose: Week 101
The PK analyses includes tabulation of plasma concentration data and summarisation of plasma concentrations by visits with participants grouped according to treatment received. Descriptive summary statistics for the Arithmetic Mean and Standard Deviation are presented below.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 156
The MMSE is a brief, practical screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline up until a maximum of 5 years
Participants were considered positive or negative for ADA based on their baseline and post-baseline sample results. The number and percentage of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels were determined. The prevalence of ADA at baseline was calculated as the proportion of participants with confirmed positive ADA levels at baseline relative to the total number of participants with a sample available at baseline. The incidence of treatment-emergent ADAs was determined as the proportion of participants with confirmed post-baseline positive ADAs relative to the total number of participants that had at least one post-baseline sample available for ADA analysis.
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Two Year Study to Evaluate the Effect of Subcutaneous RO4909832 on Cognition and Function in Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease With Option for up to an Additional Two Years of Treatment and an Open-Label Extension With Active Study Treatment
Acronym: Scarlet Road
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05519137
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Menands, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04867616
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Fresno, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02947893
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06206824
Abnormalities, Multiple, Alzheimer Disease
Gières, France
View Trial Details