Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00824421

A Study Of Different Doses Of UK-453, 061 Plus Truvada Compared To Efavirenz Plus Truvada In Patients Who Have Not Been Previously Treated For HIV-1

This is a 96 week study to determine if UK- 453,061 in combination with Truvada is as efficacious, safe and tolerable as efavirenz in combination with Truvada in HIV-1 infected patients who have not been previously treated with antiretroviral drugs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Pfizer Investigational Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female at least 18 years of age available for a follow-up period of at least 96 weeks.
  • HIV 1 RNA viral load of greater then 1,000 copies/mL
  • Negative urine pregnancy test.

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspected or documented active, untreated HIV-1 related opportunist infection or other condition requiring acute therapy at the time of randomization.
  • Subjects with acute Hepatitis B and/or C within 30 days of randomization.
  • Absolute CD4 count <200 cells/mm3.

Treatment and study plan

UK-453, 061

Drug

UK-453,061 500 mg tablets PO QD + Tenofovir DF 300 mg/Emtricitabine 200 mg tablets PO QD.

EFV +TVA

Drug

Efavirenz 600 mg tablets PO QD + Tenofovir DF 300 mg/Emtricitabine 200 tablets mg PO QD.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Less Than 50 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies/mL) of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Ribonucleic Acid (HIV-1 RNA) at Week 48

    Time frame: Week 48

    Plasma HIV-1 RNA level was determined by validated Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor standard assay.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Less Than 50 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 and 96

    Time frame: Week 24, 96

    Plasma HIV-1 RNA level was determined by validated Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor standard assay.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Less Than 400 Copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Week 24, 48, 96

    Plasma HIV-1 RNA level was determined by validated Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor standard assay.

  3. Change From Baseline in Log 10 Transformed HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48, 96

    For the log 10 scale, all the HIV-1 RNA levels were log 10 transformed prior to the average calculations. Baseline value was calculated as the average of all the measurements collected prior to and including Day 1 pre-dose.

  4. Time-Averaged Difference (TAD) in Log 10 Transformed HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24, 48, 96

    TAD was calculated as area under the curve of HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/mL) from baseline to the time point of interest divided by time period in weeks minus baseline HIV-1 RNA level (log10 copies/mL). Baseline value was calculated as the average of all the measurements collected prior to and including Day 1 pre-dose.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Response as Determined Using the Time-to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR50) Algorithm at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Week 24, 48, 96

    TLOVR50 response is compliment to TLOVR50 failure. TLOVR50 failure based on observed HIV-1 RNA levels and failure events (death; permanent discontinuation of drug; lost to follow-up; met treatment failure [TF] criteria). TF: an increase to at least 3 times baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level at Week 2 or thereafter; failure to achieve HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL at Week 24; starting at Week 2, an increase in HIV-1 RNA level to detectable levels (>50 copies/mL). TF criteria's defined above were confirmed by second measurement at least 14 days after first. In 'TLOVR50', '50' denotes the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of assay (which is 50 copies/mL). Baseline value was calculated as the average of all the measurements collected prior to and including Day 1 pre-dose.

  6. Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD4+) Absolute Cell Count at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48, 96

    Baseline value was calculated as the average of all the measurements collected prior to and including Day 1 pre-dose.

  7. Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD4+) Percentage Cell Count at Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24, 48, 96

    Baseline value was calculated as the average of all the measurements collected prior to and including Day 1 pre-dose.

  8. Number of Participants With NRTI and NNRTI Resistance-Associated Mutations (RAMs) at Time of Treatment Failure Through Week 24, 48 and 96

    Time frame: Day 1 (pre-dose) through Week 24, 48, 96

    Phenotypic resistance and genotypic resistance was assessed for all participants at Day 1 predose, and was evaluated for nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and non-NRTIs (NNRTIs) resistance-associated mutations at time of treatment failure using Monogram GenoSeq and/or PhenoSenseGT assays. This was then repeated for all participants with HIV-1 viral load more than 500 copies/mL at treatment failure, up to Week 96.

  9. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 96 or early termination

    Laboratory analysis included hematology, blood chemistry, serum and urine pregnancy test, hepatitis testing and urinalysis. Laboratory values that met the criteria of the Division of Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) grade 1 (mild, symptoms causing no or minimal interference with usual social and functional activities) or greater were considered as abnormal.

  10. Population Pharmacokinetic (PK) of Lersivirine

    Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48

    Data for this outcome measure are not reported here because the analysis population includes participants who were not enrolled in this study. ClinicalTrials.gov is designed for reporting results from only those participants who were enrolled in the study and described in the participant flow and baseline characteristics modules.

  11. Lersivirine Success Percentage With Reference to Median Minimum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmin)

    Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48

    Simple quartile exposure analysis of success rate (viral load <50 copies/mL) versus median Cmin assesses the exposure response relationship. Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL at median Cmin quartile were planned to be reported.

  12. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC[0-24]) of Lersivirine

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hours (hrs) post-dose on Week 4

    AUC (0-24)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero (pre-dose) to 24 hours post-dose (0-24). Only participants from Lersivirine treatment arms were planned to be analyzed for Pharmacokinetic (PK) sub-study.

  13. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Lersivirine

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hrs post-dose on Week 4

  14. Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Lersivirine

    Time frame: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 hrs post-dose on Week 4

  15. Plasma Concentration of Lersivirine at 24 Hour

    Time frame: 24 hrs post-dose on Week 4

    The observed plasma concentration at 24 hours post-dose (C 24h).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2B Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Trial Of UK-453,061, In Combination With Tenofovir Df And Emtricitabine Versus Efavirenz In Combination With Tenofovir DF And Emtricitabine For The Treatment Of Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jan 16, 2009
Registry last updated
Jan 24, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.