Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00940485

A Study of Combination or Sequential Treatment With PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a) and Entecavir in Patients With HBeAg Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

This 2 arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of Pegasys in combination or sequential treatment with entecavir in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. Patients who have been pretreated with, and responded to, entecavir for 9 to 36 months were randomized to one of 2 groups, to receive Pegasys 180micrograms/week sc for 48 weeks + entecavir 0.5mg po daily for 8 weeks, or entecavir 0.5mg po daily for 48 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Changsha, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >=18 and </= 65 years of age
  • HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B
  • Pre-treatment with entecavir for 9-36 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Antiviral, antineoplastic or immunomodulatory treatment
  • Co-infection with active hepatitis A, C or D, or HIV
  • Evidence of decompensated liver disease
  • History or other evidence of a medical condition associated with chronic liver disease other than viral hepatitis

Treatment and study plan

Entecavir

Drug

0.5mg po daily for 8 weeks

peginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]

Drug

180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen Seroconversion at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Hepatitis B envelope Antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion was defined as the absence of HBeAg and the presence of antibody to Hepatitis B envelope antigen (anti-HBe).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Loss of Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Loss of Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen (HBeAg) is defined as the absence of HBeAg.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus - Deoxyribonucleic Acid <1000 Copies/ Millilitre at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Blood was collected for Hepatitis B Virus - Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV -DNA) and was analysed at the central laboratories using the Roche approved polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology at Week 48. Percentage of participants with HBV-DNA < 1000 copies/mL was reported.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroconversion at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion was defined as loss of HBsAg and presence of anti-HBs .(antibody to Hepatitis B surface antigen)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Normalized Alanine Aminotransferase at Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Normalized Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) is defined as having a baseline ALT value > upper limit of normal (ULN), and a decrease in ALT value to ≤ ULN at the given time point.

  6. Quantitative Change in Mean Hepatitis B Envelope Antigen Over Time

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Quantitative hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) results were analyzed in central lab. Values that were less than lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) had been replaced by LLOQ when analyzed, e.g. <1000 was replaced by 1000 and <0.2 was replaced by 0.2. Quantitative HBeAg value unit was calculated using 'Paul Ehrlich Institute units per millilitre' (PEIU/ml). Change in HBeAg was analysed at Weeks 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48.

  7. Quantitative Change in Mean Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Change Over Time

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) results were analyzed in central lab. Values that were less than LLOQ had been replaced by LLOQ when analyzed, e.g. <1000 was replaced by 1000 and <0.2 was replaced by 0.2. Quantitative HBsAg calculated using 'International Units Per Millilitre' (IU/mL). Change in HBsAg was analysed at Weeks 0, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48.

  8. Number of Participants With Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A Serious Adverse Events (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect.

  9. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Which Were Captured as an Adverse Event

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities which were captured as an AE (at the >=5% threshold) were presented.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Study on Optimizing HBeAg Seroconversion in HBeAg Positive CHB Patients With Combination or Sequential Treatment of Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a and Entecavir

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Jul 16, 2009
Registry last updated
Mar 25, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.