2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)
OtherFDG prepared in sterile buffered solution for intravenous injection. Dosage was based on the participant's weight not to exceed 15 mCi (millicurie).
NCT Number: NCT00453362
This is a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, international pilot study to evaluate changes that occur in 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)- and 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine(FLT)-PET (Positron Emission Tomography) imaging as a result of treatment with erlotinib in patients with recurrent or refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study will enroll approximately 30 patients at approximately 4 sites in Australia and 2 sites in the United States.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
FDG prepared in sterile buffered solution for intravenous injection. Dosage was based on the participant's weight not to exceed 15 mCi (millicurie).
FLT 7 mCi dose prepared in sterile buffered solution for intravenous injection.
Tablets taken orally 150 mg/day.
Other names: Tarceva
Time frame: Time from first erlotinib treatment to disease progression on CT (per RECIST 1.0) or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
PFS was compared between patients with FDG-PET response and patients without FDG-PET response, independent of CT response (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
Mean of the percent changes in maximal standard uptake values (mSUVmax) from FDG-PET scans was used to define FDG-PET response. Based on European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) definitions, an objective FDG-PET response was defined an mSUVmax <-25%.
Time frame: Time from first erlotinib treatment to disease progression on CT (per RECIST 1.0) or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
PFS was compared between patients with FDG-PET response (Complete /Partial Responses) and patients with FDG-PET progression, within the subset of patients who demonstrated stable disease on CT (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib. FDG-PET response; defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans of <-25% and FDG-PET disease progression; defined as a mSUVmax >+25% or the development of a new lesion with a mSUVmax above background not explained by another cause.
Time frame: Time from first erlotinib treatment to disease progression on CT (per RECIST 1.0) or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
PFS was compared between patients with FLT-PET response and patients without FLT-PET response, independent of CT response (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
FLT-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans <-25%.
Time frame: Time from first erlotinib treatment to disease progression on CT (per RECIST 1.0) or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
PFS was compared between patients with FLT-PET response and patients without FLT-PET response, independent of computed tomography (CT) response (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
FLT-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans <-25% and FLT-PET disease progression was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans >+25% or the development of a new lesion with a mSUVmax above background not explained by another cause.
Time frame: From first erlotinib treatment to death, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to death.
Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with FDG-PET response and patients without FDG-PET response, independent of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.0) computed tomography (CT) response at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib. FDG-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans <-25%.
Time frame: From first erlotinib treatment to death, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to death.
OS was compared between patients with FDG-PET response and patients with FDG-PET progression, within the subset of patients who demonstrated stable disease (SD) on CT (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
FDG-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans <-25% and FDG-PET disease progression was defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans >+25% or the development of a new lesion with a mSUVmax above background not explained by another cause.
Time frame: From first erlotinib treatment to death, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to death.
OS was compared between patients with FLT-PET response and patients without FLT-PET response, independent of CT response (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
FLT-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans <-25%.
Time frame: From first erlotinib treatment to death, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of first erlotinib dose to death.
OS was compared between patients with FLT-PET response and patients with FLT-PET progression, within the subset of patients who demonstrated SD on CT (per RECIST 1.0) at Day 56 of treatment with erlotinib.
FLT-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans of <-25% and FLT-PET disease progression was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans >+25% or the development of a new lesion with a mSUVmax above background not explained by another cause.
Time frame: Day 14 and Day 56
In patients with computed tomography (CT)-stable disease (according to RECIST 1.0) at 56 days of erlotinib treatment, the percentage of patients who demonstrated FDG-PET responses after the initial 14 days and 56 days of erlotinib treatment.
FDG-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans <-25%.
CT SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Time frame: Day 14 and Day 56
In patients with CT-stable disease (according to RECIST 1.0) at 56 days of erlotinib treatment, the percentage of patients who demonstrated FLT-PET responses after the initial 14 days and 56 days of erlotinib treatment.
FLT-PET response was defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans <-25%. CT SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Time frame: Day 56
In patients with partial response or progressive disease on CT (per RECIST 1.0) after 56 days of erlotinib treatment, the percentage of patients who demonstrated FDG-PET responses on Day 56 defined as a mSUVmax from FDG-PET scans <-25%.
CT Partial Response defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesion taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD.
CT Progressive disease defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Time frame: Day 56
In patients with partial response or progressive disease on CT (per RECIST 1.0) after 56 days of erlotinib treatment, the percentage of patients who demonstrated FLT-PET responses on Day 56 defined as a mSUVmax from FLT-PET scans <-25%.
CT Partial Response defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesion taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD.
CT Progressive disease defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD since treatment started or appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Time frame: From screening to Day 112 assessment visit or study discontinuation or termination, whichever is first. On visits after Day 112, only SAE were recorded.
The number of participants who experienced an adverse event judged by the investigator to be related to FLT-PET.
Genentech, Inc.
Industry
Pilot Study of Changes in FDG- and FLT-PET Imaging in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Treatment With Erlotinib
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02718066
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05348668
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04702009
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06477055
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial Details