NCT Number: NCT00484939
This 2-arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda), compared with capecitabine alone, in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized to receive either bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle) in combination with capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day on Days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day on Days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle) alone.
No notable trends or interactions in laboratory values, electrocardiogram, or vital signs suggesting an effect in either direction for capecitabine/bevacizumab combination therapy or capecitabine monotherapy were observed during the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me70 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Innsbruck, Austria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or a decision to terminate at the discretion of the Investigator if medically indicated. Bevacizumab was supplied in single-use vials.
Other names: Avastin
Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or a decision to terminate at the discretion of the Investigator if medically indicated. Capecitabine was supplied as tablets.
Other names: Xeloda
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. All measurable lesions (maximum of 5 per organ and 10 in total, those with the longest diameter and suitability for accurate repeated measurements) were identified as target lesions (TL). A sum of the longest diameter for all TLs was calculated and reported as the baseline sum longest diameter (SLD). All other lesions were identified as non-TLs and recorded at baseline. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
BOR was defined as the best response (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], stable disease [SD], progressive disease [PD], not evaluable [NE], or not assessed [NA]) recorded from the start of study treatment until disease progression (PD) or death. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. For TLs, SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started. For non-TLs, SD was defined as the persistence of 1 or more lesions. PD was defined as ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started, the unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Duration of response was defined as the time in months from the first confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Time to response was defined as the time in months from the date of first study treatment to the date of the first documentation of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), whichever occurred first. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target (TL) and non-target lesions (non-TL). PR was defined as ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or the persistence of 1 or more non-TLs. Participants who did not have a confirmed response were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment, or if that was unavailable, at the date of the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: Baseline to the Safety Follow-up which occurred 28 days after the last dose of treatment (up to 5 years 8 months).
The ECOG performance status is a scale used to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. The scale ranges from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 indicating death. The 6 categories are 0=Asymptomatic (Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities without restriction), 1=Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature), 2=Symptomatic, < 50% in bed during the day (Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours), 3=Symptomatic, > 50% in bed, but not bedbound (Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair 50% or more of waking hours), 4=Bedbound (Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair), 5=Death. Reported is the percentage of participants in each of the 6 ECOG performance status categories.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Reported is the percentage of participants requiring additional treatment for malignancy in the survival follow-up period.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 5 years 8 months)
Duration of follow-up is defined as the time in days from randomization until disease progression or death, or time to censoring for overall survival.
Time frame: Throughout study
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Randomised, Open-label Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination With Capecitabine as First-line Treatment for Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725692
Anastomotic Leak, Colon Cancer
Alexandria, Please Select, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07180303
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Liyang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03958747
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details