Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00796757

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Low-Dose-Interferon in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).

This single arm study will assess progression free survival, tumor response and safety of Avastin in combination with interferon alfa-2a (IFN) as first line treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients will receive Avastin (10mg/kg iv) every 2 weeks in combination with a low dose of interferon alfa-2a (3 MIU sc three times per week (t.i.w.). The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • metastatic RCC with majority (>50%) of conventional clear-cell type;
  • prior total nephrectomy for primary RCC;
  • at least one measurable or non-measurable lesions;
  • ECOG performance score of 0 or 2.

Exclusion criteria

  • prior systemic treatment for metastatic RCC;
  • current or previously treated but non-stable CNS metastases or spinal cord compression;
  • major surgery (including open biopsy) or radiation therapy within 28 days prior to enrollment;
  • significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

bevacizumab [Avastin]

Drug

10mg/kg iv infusion every 2 weeks

Interferon alfa-2a

Drug

3 MIU sc t.i.w.

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Progression Free at 12 and 24 Months

    Time frame: 12 and 24 months

    PFS at 12 and 24 months is an estimate of the percentages of participants expected to be progression free at 12 and 24 months based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the PFS data. PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

  2. PFS - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline assessment tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

  3. PFS - Time to Event

    Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    PFS was defined as the time period from the first postbaseline assessment tumor assessment to evidence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression included evaluation solely due to symptomatic deterioration or death due to any reason. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Reponse (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

    Time frame: Baseline, every 8 weeks to Week 32 then every 12 weeks to disease progression or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    Percentage of participants with objective response, termed responders, based assessment of confirmed CR or confirmed PR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study greater than or equal to (≥)4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must have decreased to normal (short axis less than [<]10 millimeters [mm]). No new lesions. PR was defined as ≥30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

  2. Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive at 12 and 24 Months

    Time frame: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    OS at 12 and 24 months is the estimate of the percentages of participants expected to alive at 12 and 24 months based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the survival data. Median OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

  3. OS - Percentage of Participants With an Event

    Time frame: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

  4. OS - Time to Event

    Time frame: Day 0, every 2 weeks until disease progression or end of treatment visit (28 days after last bevacizumab infusion, every 3 months during follow-up, or a maximum of 2 years from enrollment of last participant

    OS was defined as the time period from the first bevacizumab infusion to death from any cause. Censoring at start of any subsequent antineoplastic therapy was not performed.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Any Health Problems as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) by Visit

    Time frame: Screening/Baseline, Cycle 7, Cycle 25, Cycle 43, Cycle 61, and End of Treatment (EOT)

    EQ-5D is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme problems) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a 100-point visual analog scale (0=worst, 100=best). Answers from the questionnaire for each dimension (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) was classified into one of 2 categories: 'no problems' or 'any problems', and the percentage of participants in each category was determined.

  6. EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Screening/Baseline, Cycle 7, Cycle 25, Cycle 43, Cycle 61, and EOT

    EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 millimeters (mm) (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Participants were asked to rate their health state and mark the line; the distance from the left edge was recorded. For change from baseline a negative value represents a worsening in the health state and a positive value represents an improvement in the health state.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label Study of the Effect of First Line Treatment With Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Low-dose Interferon on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Nov 24, 2008
Registry last updated
May 27, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.