Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00623805

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

This 2 arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with Avastin (bevacizumab) + Xeloda (capecitabine), after initial treatment with Xeloda + oxaliplatin + Avastin, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were randomized into one of 2 groups to receive 1) Xeloda + oxaliplatin + Avastin until disease progression or 2) Xeloda + oxaliplatin + Avastin for 6 3-week cycles, followed by Xeloda + Avastin until disease progression. Xeloda was administered at a dose of 1000 mg/m^2 orally twice a day on days 1-14 of each cycle, oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on day 1 of each cycle, and Avastin at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg iv on day 1 of each cycle.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Histologically confirmed colon or rectal cancer, with unresectable metastatic disease.
  • At least 1 measurable lesion.
  • Outpatient, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status = 0-1.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous treatment with Avastin.
  • Previous systemic treatment for advanced or metastatic disease.
  • clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Daily chronic treatment with high doses of aspirin (> 325 mg/day) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Treatment and study plan

Bevacizumab

Drug

Bevacizumab was supplied as a solution in single-use vials.

Other names: Avastin

Capecitabine

Drug

Capecitabine was supplied as film-coated tablets.

Other names: Xeloda

Oxaliplatin

Drug

Oxaliplatin was supplied as a lyophilized powder in vials.

Other names: Eloxatin

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug to death.

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Partial Response

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

    A complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the Baseline sum longest diameter. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. All other lesions (or sites of disease) should be identified as non-target lesions. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter.

  3. Time Until a Complete Response or a Partial Response

    Time frame: Baseline to Month 13

    Time until a complete response or a partial response was defined as the time from the first administration of study drug until the first complete response or partial response.

  4. Duration of Response

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

    Duration of response was defined as the time from the first complete response or partial response until disease progression or death. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at Baseline. Target lesions should be selected on the basis of their size (lesions with the longest diameter) and their suitability for accurate repeated measurements (either by imaging techniques or clinically). A sum of the longest diameter for all target lesions will be calculated and reported as the Baseline sum longest diameter.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Metastatic Lesions Previously Considered Inoperable Who Became Operable and Underwent Surgery

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

  6. Percentage of Participants With a R0 Resection

    Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 2 months)

    An R0 resection indicates a microscopically margin-negative resection, in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the primary tumor bed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab and Capecitabine as Maintenance Treatment, After Initial Combination Treatment With Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Feb 26, 2008
Registry last updated
Aug 8, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.