Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00559754

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Sequential Chemotherapy in Patients With Primary HER2 Negative Operable Breast Cancer.

This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of a combination of Avastin and docetaxel following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, in patients with HER2 negative operable breast cancer. Patients will receive 4 x 3 week cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin (60mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each cycle) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each cycle). They will then receive 4 x 3 week cycles of docetaxel (75mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle) in combination with Avastin (15mg/kg on day 1 of each cycle). The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Sabadell, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients, >=18 years of age;
  • primary HER2-negative operable breast cancer;
  • tumor >2cm in size;
  • ECOG performance status 0-1.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous treatment for breast cancer;
  • metastatic disease;
  • current or recent (within 10 days of first dose of Avastin) use of aspirin (>325mg/day) or full-dose anticoagulants for therapeutic purposes;
  • clinically significant cardiovascular disease.

Treatment and study plan

bevacizumab [Avastin]

Drug

15mg/kg iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

docetaxel

Drug

75mg/m2 iv on day 1 of each 3 week cycle

Standard Chemotherapy

Drug

As prescribed

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR)

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria: 1) the primary tumor was Grade 5 (no malignant cells identified at the location of the primary tumor (ductal carcinoma in situ may be present); 2) no involvement was identified in the lymph nodes; 3) the tumour size at evaluation of the surgical piece was 0 centimeters (cm); and 4) the pathological staging of the tumour from the surgical piece was pT0pN0pM0, the stage is not applicable (NA). It will only be considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Objective Clinical Response

    Time frame: Within 28 days of enrollment, Weeks 12 and 24

    Overall clinical response is the best response obtained through physical examination and/or radiological tests after completion of chemotherapy cycles. The percentage of participants with objective response based on assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and was categorized as clinical response (CR+PR) or clinical benefit (CR+PR+ no change [NC]). Per RECIST, CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. Complete and partial responses must have been confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Breast-Conserving Surgery

    Time frame: Week 24

    Breast-conserving surgery was defined as lumpectomy + lymphadenectomy (LA), segmentectomy + LA, quadrantectomy + LA, or other (including sentinal node extirpation tumorectomy).

  3. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Proliferation of Ki67

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Biomarker Ki67 proliferation was defined as low (less than [<]15% ) and high (≥15%).

  4. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Kisspeptin (KISS1) Amplification

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 amplification was defined as 1 (aneuploid), 2 (normal), 4 (amplification), or NE (not evaluated).

  5. Percentage of Participants With pCR by KISS1 Protein Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

  6. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) Amplification

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEFGR amplification was defined as 1 (aneuploid), 2 (normal), 4 (amplification), or NE (not evaluated).

  7. Percentage of Participants With pCR by VEGFR Protein Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGFR protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

  8. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Hypoxia Inducible Factor (HIF) Protein Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. HIF protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

  9. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (ENOS) Protein Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. ENOS protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

  10. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Angiotension Protein Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Angiotensin protein expression was defined as 0 (no expression), 1 (normal), 2 (augmented expression), or NE (not evaluated).

  11. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  12. Percentage of Participants With pCR by VEGFR Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. VEGFR gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  13. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. pAKT gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  14. Percentage of Participants With pCR by HIF Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. HIF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  15. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. IGF gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  16. Percentage of Participants With pCR by ENOS Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. ENOS gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  17. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Phosphorylated MAP Kinase (pMAPK) Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. pMAPK gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  18. Percentage of Participants With pCR by Angiotensin II Receptor Type I (AGTR) Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. AGTR gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  19. Percentage of Participants With pCR by KISS1 Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. KISS1 gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

  20. Percentage of Participants With pCR by RKISS1 Gene Expression

    Time frame: After Week 24 (surgery)

    The percentage of participants with pCR was determined by anatomopathological study after completion of 8 cycles of study treatment. The anatomopathological study of the surgical piece was performed and assessed according to the Miller-Payne criteria. It was only considered pCR in the case of absence of invasive tumour cells in the breast and lymph nodes. RKISS1 gene expression was defined as below the housekeeping reference level (>0), above the housekeeping reference level (<0), or equal to the housekeeping reference level (0).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open Label Study to Assess the Effect of a Combination of Avastin and Docetaxel and Sequential Chemotherapy on Pathological Response in Patients With Primary Operable HER2 Negative Breast Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Nov 16, 2007
Registry last updated
Nov 10, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.