Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01801111

A Study of Alectinib (RO5424802) in Participants With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Mutation and Failed Crizotinib Treatment

This open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of alectinib in participants with non-small cell lung cancer who have ALK mutation and failed crizotinib treatment. In Part 1, cohorts of participants will receive escalating doses of alectinib orally twice daily. In Part 2, participants will receive the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of alectinib as determined in Part 1. Treatment will continue in Part 1 and Part 2 on the same dose until disease progression. In Part 3, following disease progression, participants without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation will be offered continued treatment with alectinib, participants with EGFR mutations will be offered a combination of alectinib and erlotinib.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Bronchial Neoplasms Carcinoma, Bronchogenic Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Lung Diseases Lung Neoplasms Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Respiratory Tract Diseases Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Thoracic Neoplasms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIB or IV by American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC])
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
  • Documented ALK rearrangement based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved test
  • Prior treatment with crizotinib and progression according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Participants had to have a minimum 1-week wash-out period between the last dose of crizotinib and the first dose of study treatment. Participants can either be chemotherapy-naïve or have received at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function
  • Participants with brain or leptomeningeal metastases are allowed if protocol defined criteria are met
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1 prior to administration of first dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

  • Receipt of any other ALK inhibitors in addition to crizotinib
  • Receipt of any prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for ALK-positive NSCLC within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Participants who received crizotinib or any other tyrosine kinase inhibitors need to have a minimum 1-week washout period before the first dose of study drug
  • Active or uncontrolled infectious diseases requiring treatment
  • National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (NCI CTCAE v4.03) Grade 3 or higher toxicities due to prior therapy that have not shown improvement and are considered to interfere with current study medication
  • History of organ transplant
  • Co-administration of anti-cancer therapies other than those administered in this study
  • Baseline corrected Q-T interval (QTc) greater than (>) 470 milliseconds, or baseline symptomatic bradycardia (less than 45 heart beats per minute)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positivity or Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)-related illness
  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the additives in the alectinib formulation
  • Any clinically significant concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with, or for which treatment might interfere with, the conduct of the study, or absorption of oral medications, or that would, in the opinion of the principal investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant in the study

Treatment and study plan

Erlotinib

Drug

Erlotinib will be administered at a dose of 100 mg via tablet, orally, once daily in combination with alectinib to participants who progressed on alectinib alone treatment as per treating physician discretion.

Other names: Tarceva

Alectinib

Drug

Alectinib will be administered at a dose of 600 milligrams (mg) via capsule, orally, twice daily.

Other names: RO5452802

Primary outcomes

  1. Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)

    RP2D was to be determined based on the safety and tolerability profile of the study treatment.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    Time frame: Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)

    DLTs were to be assessed based on the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.3 (NCI-CTCAE v 4.3). DLTs: drug-related toxicities that meet any one of the following criteria: Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; Grade 4 neutropenia continuing for greater than or equal to (>/=) 7 consecutive days or neutropenic fever; Non-hematological toxicity of Grade 3 or higher; Adverse events that require interruption of treatment for a total of >/=7 days.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) as Assessed by Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRC) in Response Evaluable (RE) Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by IRC according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as >/=30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters (SoD) of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (CR or PR) as Assessed by IRC in Chemotherapy-Pretreated Participants

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by IRC according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (CR or PR) as Assessed by IRC in Chemotherapy-Naive Participants

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by IRC according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD).

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (CR or PR) as Assessed by Investigator in RE Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (CR or PR) as Assessed by Investigator in Chemotherapy-Pretreated Participants

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD).

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Response (CR or PR) as Assessed by Investigator in Chemotherapy-Naive Participants

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    Tumor response was assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1. Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD).

  5. Duration of Response (DoR) as Assessed by IRC in RE Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    DoR was defined as the time from the first observation of an objective tumor response (CR or PR) until first observation of progressive disease (PD) according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR: >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SoD, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded since treatment started; 1 or more new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Duration of response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Participants who did not progress or die after a confirmed objective response were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.

  6. Percentage of Participants With PD as Assessed by IRC According to RECIST v1.1 or Death From Any Cause in Safety Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    According to RECIST v1.1, PD was defined as >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SoD, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded since treatment started; 1 or more new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

  7. Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC in Safety Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    PFS was defined as the time interval between the date of the first treatment and the date of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SoD, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded since treatment started; 1 or more new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Participants who neither progressed nor died at the time of assessment or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants with no post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of first dose.

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Died of Any Cause

    Time frame: Baseline up to death from any cause (up to approximately 4 years)

    Percentage of participants who died of any cause was reported.

  9. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Baseline up to death from any cause (up to approximately 4 years)

    OS was defined as the time from the date of first treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. Participants who did not die were censored at the date last known to be alive.

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving CR, PR or Stable Disease (SD) According to RECIST v1.1 in RE Population

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of participants achieving CR, PR, or SD that lasted for at least 16 weeks. Tumor response was assessed by the investigator and IRC according to RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target, non-target lesions; normalization of tumor marker level; and reduction in all lymph nodes size to <10 mm. PR: >/=30% decrease in the SoD of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). PD: >/=20% relative increase and >/=5 mm of absolute increase in the SoD, taking as reference the smallest SoD recorded since treatment started; 1 or more new lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SoD while on study. The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving Central Nervous System (CNS) Objective Response as Assessed by IRC According to RECIST v1.1

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    CNS response was assessed by IRC according to RECIST v1.1. CNS Objective response was defined as percentage of participants with a CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all CNS lesions. PR was defined as >/=30% decrease in the SoD of measurable CNS lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving CNS Objective Response as Assessed by IRC According to Radiology Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator; then survival follow-up until cutoff 18 August 2014 (up to approximately 53 weeks)

    CNS response was assessed by IRC according to RANO criteria. CNS Objective response: percentage of participants with a CR or PR that was confirmed by repeat assessments >/=4 weeks after initial documentation. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable, non-measurable disease; stable or improved non-enhancing lesions; no new lesions; no corticosteroids (or only physiologic replacement dose), and clinically stable or improved. PR was defined as >/=50% decrease compared to screening in the sum of the products of the diameters (SPD) of enhancing measurable lesions; no progression of non-measurable disease (enhancing and non-enhancing lesions); no new lesions; no corticosteroids (or only physiologic replacement dose), and clinically stable or improved. The 95% CI was computed using Clopper-Pearson method.

  13. CNS Duration of Response (CDoR) as Assessed by IRC According to RECIST v1.1

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator, or last tumor assessment (up to approximately 2.5 years)

    CDoR was defined as the time from the first observation of a CNS objective response (CR or PR) until first observation of CNS progression as assessed by IRC according to RECIST v 1.1 or death from any cause. CR: disappearance of all CNS lesions. PR: >/=30% decrease in the SoD of measurable CNS lesions (taking as reference the baseline SoD). CNS progression: >/=20% increase in the SoD of measurable CNS lesions (with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), taking as reference the baseline SoD; 1 or more new CNS lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-measurable CNS lesions. CDoR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

  14. CDoR as Assessed by IRC According to RANO Criteria

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator; then survival follow-up until cutoff 18 August 2014 (up to approximately 53 weeks)

    CDoR: time from the CNS objective response until CNS progression as assessed by IRC according to RANO criteria or death from any cause. CR: complete disappearance of all enhancing measurable, non-measurable disease; stable/improved non-enhancing lesions; no new lesions; no corticosteroids, and clinically stable/improved. PR: >/=50% decrease compared to screening in SPD of enhancing measurable lesions; no progression of non-measurable disease; no new lesions; no corticosteroids, and clinically stable/improved. Progression: >/=25% increase in SPD of enhancing measurable lesions compared to best response on study; stable/increasing doses of corticosteroids; significant increase in non-enhancing lesions not caused by co-morbid events; any new lesions; progression of non-measurable disease; or clinical deterioration not attributable to other non-tumor causes. CDoR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and 95% CI was assessed using method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

  15. Percentage of Participants With CNS Progression as Assessed by IRC According to RECIST v 1.1

    Time frame: Baseline; assessments every 8 weeks post-baseline until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, death, other reason deemed by investigator; then survival follow-up until cutoff 18 August 2014 (up to approximately 53 weeks)

    According to RECIST v 1.1, CNS progression was defined as >/=20% increase in the SoD of measurable CNS lesions (with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm), taking as reference the baseline SoD; 1 or more new CNS lesion(s); and/or unequivocal progression of non-measurable CNS lesions.

  16. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hours [hrs]), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Cmax for alectinib was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 (Pharsight Corporation) software.

  17. Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Tmax for alectinib was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 software.

  18. Time to Last Measurable Plasma Concentration (Tlast) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Tlast for alectinib was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 software.

  19. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 10 Hours Post-dose (AUC[0-10]) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    The AUC(0-10) of alectinib was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule and actual sampling times (with the exception of pre-dose which was set to zero).

  20. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Tlast (AUC[0-last]) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    The AUC(0-last) of alectinib was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule and actual sampling times (with the exception of pre-dose which was set to zero).

  21. Cmax of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Cmax for alectinib metabolite was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 software.

  22. Tmax of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Tmax for alectinib metabolite was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 software.

  23. Tlast of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Tlast for alectinib metabolite was estimated from plasma concentration versus time data by non-compartmental methods of analysis using Phoenix WinNonlin v6.2 software.

  24. AUC(0-10) of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    The AUC(0-10) of alectinib metabolite was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule and actual sampling times (with the exception of pre-dose which was set to zero).

  25. AUC(0-last) of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    The AUC(0-last) of alectinib metabolite was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule and actual sampling times (with the exception of pre-dose which was set to zero).

  26. Metabolite to Parent Ratio Based on AUC(0-10)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Metabolite to parent ratio based on AUC(0-10) was computed as AUC(0-10) of metabolite divided by AUC(0-10) of parent drug (alectinib) corrected for the molecular weight of parent divided by the molecular weight of the metabolite.

  27. Metabolite to Parent Ratio Based on AUC(0-last)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hrs post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Metabolite to parent ratio based on AUC(0-last) was computed as AUC(0-last) of metabolite divided by AUC(0-last) of parent drug (alectinib) corrected for the molecular weight of parent divided by the molecular weight of the metabolite.

  28. Trough Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs) on Day 21 of Cycle 1

  29. Ctrough of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs) on Day 21 of Cycle 1

  30. Peak to Trough Ratio of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 21 of Cycle 1

  31. Accumulation Ratio of Alectinib

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Accumulation ratio after repeat dosing was computed as AUC(0-10) on Day 21 divided by AUC(0-10) on Day 1.

  32. Accumulation Ratio of Alectinib Metabolite

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hrs), and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hours post-dose on Day 1 and Day 21 of Cycle 1

    Accumulation ratio after repeat dosing was computed as AUC(0-10) on Day 21 divided by AUC(0-10) on Day 1.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Multicenter Phase I/II Trial of RO5424802 Given Orally to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Have ALK Mutation and Who Have Failed Crizotinib Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2017
First posted
Feb 28, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 2, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.