embrace device
DeviceAdhesive bandage/dressing intended to minimize scar formation.
Other names: Neodyne Device, embrace dressing, Neodyne Dressing
NCT Number: NCT01399099
Neodyne has developed an investigational dressing for post-operative incision care. Neodyne is conducting this research to study whether the investigational dressing, called the Neodyne Dressing, can minimize scar formation in a simple manner.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Atherton Plastic Surgery, Atherton, California, United States
It is proposed to study a dressing designed to reduce scarring in post-incision skin tissue. It is expected that by managing the incision site during the healing phase, scar formation may be minimized.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Adhesive bandage/dressing intended to minimize scar formation.
Other names: Neodyne Device, embrace dressing, Neodyne Dressing
Time frame: 12 months
Visual Analogue Scale Scar Score (VAS Scar Score) was defined and validated by Duncan et al 2006[1]. This scale consists of a 10cm line representing scar quality, with 0 representing normal skin and 10 indicating a poor scar. The assessor places a mark along the line to represent the appearance of the scar. This mark is translated into a score by measuring its position on the 10cm line to one decimal place. The independent panel used this to scale the primary outcome.
[1] Duncan J, Bond J, Mason T, Ludlow A, Cridland P, O'Kane S and Ferguson M. Visual Analogue Scale Scoring and Ranking: A Suitable and Sensitive Method for Assessing Scar Quality? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 909, 2006.
Time frame: 6 months
Visual Analogue Scale Scar Score (VAS Scar Score) was defined and validated by Duncan et al 2006[1]. This scale consists of a 10cm line representing scar quality, with 0 representing normal skin and 10 indicating a poor scar. The assessor places a mark along the line to represent the appearance of the scar. This mark is translated into a score by measuring its position on the 10cm line to one decimal place. The independent panel used this to scale the primary outcome.
[1] Duncan J, Bond J, Mason T, Ludlow A, Cridland P, O'Kane S and Ferguson M. Visual Analogue Scale Scoring and Ranking: A Suitable and Sensitive Method for Assessing Scar Quality? Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 909, 2006.
Time frame: 6 Months
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of two numeric scales: the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient scale) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (observer scale). The patient and observer scales have to be completed by the patient and the observer, respectively [1]. The POSAS criteria evaluated by the patients in this study were pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) ranges from 1 to 10 with 10 being the worst imaginable or most different.
[1] Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PMID: 15253184.
Time frame: 12 Months
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of two numeric scales: the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient scale) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (observer scale). The patient and observer scales have to be completed by the patient and the observer, respectively [1]. The POSAS criteria evaluated by the patients in this study were pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion.
[1] Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PMID: 15253184.
Time frame: 6 Months
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of two numeric scales: the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient scale) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (observer scale). The patient and observer scales have to be completed by the patient and the observer, respectively [1]. The POSAS criteria evaluated by the observers in this study were vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and an overall opinion.
[1] Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PMID: 15253184.
Time frame: 12 Months
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of two numeric scales: the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (patient scale) and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (observer scale). The patient and observer scales have to be completed by the patient and the observer, respectively [1]. The POSAS criteria evaluated by the observers in this study were vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area, and an overall opinion.
[1] Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PMID: 15253184.
Time frame: 6 Months
Subjects were were asked to compare the embrace-treated side with the control-treated side with regards to their satisfaction with the scar minimization on their incision.
Time frame: 6 Months
Subjects were were asked to rate how likely they were to recommend embrace treatment to a friend.
Time frame: 6 Months
Subjects were asked if they were to have another procedure that would leave a scar how likely would they be to use embrace treatment again.
Time frame: 12 Months
Subjects were were asked to compare the embrace-treated side with the control-treated side with regards to their satisfaction with the scar minimization on their incision.
Time frame: 12 Months
Subjects were were asked to rate how likely they were to recommend embrace treatment to a friend.
Time frame: 12 Months
Subjects were asked if they were to have another procedure that would leave a scar how likely would they be to use embrace treatment again.
Neodyne Biosciences, Inc.
Industry
Scar Prevention and the Clinical Effectiveness of a Novel Mechanomodulating Polymer
Acronym: REFINE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01430130
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02630303
Cicatrix, Collagen Diseases
Mather, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02063243
Cicatrix, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT03479580
Angina Pectoris, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
La Tronche, France
View Trial Details