EEG-neurofeedback training
Device15 training sessions (twice/week) plus two booster training sessions added to treatment as usual.
Other names: Prism training, amyg-EFP training, active Prism training
NCT Number: NCT06770998
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if training with the Prism system can reduce PTSD symptoms in US military Veterans and civilians with PTSD. Prism is a form of neurofeedback training that uses EEG signals to promote self-regulation of brain function. The main question this study aims to answer is:
Does Prism training lead to decreased PTSD symptoms in US Veterans and civilians when used in addition to usual PTSD treatment?
Researchers will compare Prism training to a sham training (a look-alike training that does not provide real feedback on brain activity) to see if Prism training decreases PTSD symptoms.
Participants will:
* Complete two one-hour in-person training sessions a week for about 8 weeks (15 sessions) * Complete two booster training sessions one month and two months after finishing the main training course * Participate in three detailed interviews: one before training, a second after nine weeks of training, and a third one month after the last booster training session (about 20 weeks after the initial visit)
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must meet the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Potential subjects will be excluded for the following:
15 training sessions (twice/week) plus two booster training sessions added to treatment as usual.
Other names: Prism training, amyg-EFP training, active Prism training
15 sham sessions (twice/week) plus two sham booster sessions added to treatment as usual.
Other names: sham Prism training
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of 8 weeks' training (twice per week)
Participants will take the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 Revised (the CAPS-5-R) before beginning Prism training. The CAPS-5-R assesses PTSD symptom severity with total scores that range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. There are multiple ways to score the CAPS-5-R; this study will score the CAPS-5-R using the same 0-80 score range used on the CAPS-5 (the previous version of the same assessment) so that the results from this study can be more easily compared to results from previous studies on the Prism training system. Participants' scores on the CAPS-5-R after completing training will be compared to their pre-training scores to determine whether the Prism training group shows a greater reduction in PTSD symptoms than the Sham training group.
Time frame: From enrollment to 20 weeks (including an initial 8 weeks of biweekly training and two booster sessions at Week 12 and Week 16)
Participants will take the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 Revised (the CAPS-5-R) before beginning Prism training. The CAPS-5-R assesses PTSD symptom severity with total scores that range from 0-80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. There are multiple ways to score the CAPS-5-R; this study will score the CAPS-5-R using the same 0-80 score range used on the CAPS-5 (the previous version of the same assessment) so that the results from this study can be more easily compared to results from previous studies on the Prism training system. Scores on the CAPS-5-R at 20 weeks after the first assessment (about one month after the second booster session) will be compared to the baseline CAPS-5-R score to determine whether the changes due to Prism training in the Prism training group vs the Sham training group persist over time.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether PTSD symptoms as measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) decrease from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The PCL-5 measures PTSD symptoms. Total scores range from 0-80, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether PTSD symptoms as measured by the Abbreviated PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (APCL) decrease from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The ACPL measures PTSD symptoms. Total scores range from 0-16, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether depressive symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HAM-D) decrease from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The HAM-D measures depression symptoms. Scores range from 0-66, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) decrease from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The PHQ-9 measures depression symptoms. Total scores range from 0-27, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether anxiety symptoms as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) decreases from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The STAI measures anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 20-80, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale decreases from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The GAD-7 measures anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 0-21, with higher scores representing more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), determine whether general mental wellbeing improves in correspondence to treatment from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The CGI assesses severity of current illness (1-7 ranging from healthy to very ill), global improvement in response to treatment (1-7 ranging from significant improvement to significant worsening) and efficacy of treatment (describes the risk-to-benefit ratio of treatment).
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) improves from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The PSQI measures sleep quality. Total scores range from 0-21, with higher scores representing more disturbed sleep.
Time frame: 20 weeks (assessed at Week 9 and Week 20)
Determine whether emotion regulation as measured by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) improves from Baseline to Week 9 and from Baseline to Week 20 in the Prism treatment group compared to the Sham treatment group. The ERQ measures emotion regulation in terms of Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression. Cognitive Reappraisal scores range from 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater likeliness to regulate emotions through cognitive reframing. Expressive Suppression scores range from 0-28, with higher scores indicating more suppression of emotional expression.
Time frame: 20 weeks
Conduct a comprehensive analysis, combining Prism data with subject demographics, symptom ratings, and concomitant treatment, to develop prediction models which will be validated and used to predict treatment response and personalize Prism treatments.
Specific subject groups will be identified for whom the prediction engines can optimize Prism treatment based on patient characteristics. Using the algorithms developed, we will combine Prism-extracted data with clinical and demographic information to identify treatment regimen adjustments (e.g., treatment duration, time between sessions, and number of booster sessions) that may benefit specific patient groups.
The large-scale Prism data, combined with validated clinical measurements and subject characteristics, will allow Prism treatment personalization by predicting individual treatment responses. This will lay the groundwork for optimizing combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Inc.
Other
A Prospective Randomized Study of a Novel EEG Neurofeedback System for the Treatment of PTSD Using Machine Learning-Based Amygdala Biomarkers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07656545
Acute Stress Disorder, Burns
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03376633
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05554094
Mental Disorder, Mental Disorders
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00032617
Mental Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details