Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04552535

A Study in the United States Using Electronic Medical Records (EMR) to Assess Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

This study aims to characterize the profile and outcomes for patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung (SqCC) who progress on 1L pembrolizumab in combination with platinum based chemotherapy and receive afatinib as second line (2L) therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions

Dublin, Ohio, 43017, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of squamous or mixed histology non-small cell lung cancer
  • Treated with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as initial therapy for advanced or metastatic disease (stage IIIB or IV)
  • First cycle of pembrolizumab received after 06/01/2018
  • Permanently discontinued 1L pembrolizumab treatment
  • Initiated second-line treatment at least 3 months prior to the date of data collection, with either :
  • Afatinib
  • Any chemotherapy
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

-Received pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy as part of an interventional clinical trial

Treatment and study plan

Second line (2L) afatinib

Drug

Afatinib

Second line chemotherapy

Drug

Chemotherapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Time on Treatment With Afatinib or Chemotherapy During Second Line (2L) Treatment

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated and up to 7.5 months for chemotherapy treated patients

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

  2. Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Histology Status

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment. Patients treated with afatinib were analysed for their histology status and categorized into a squamous cell - or mixed histology treatment group.

  3. Time on Treatment With Afatinib During Second Line (2L) Treatment Defined by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Status

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment, up to 12.3 months for afatinib treated patients

    Time on treatment was defined as the interval from the start of second-line treatment until discontinuation of second-line treatment for any reason, e.g. toxicity, progression, death, patient choice. The end of 2L treatment was defined as the date of last treatment order for afatinib plus the days of supply on the last known treatment order up to the date of data collection (but not exceeding). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate the median and 95% confidence interval for time on treatment.

  4. Number of Patients With Severe Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) of Specific Interest During Second-line Treatment

    Time frame: From the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up, up to 15 months

    Chart abstractors (i.e. the patients treating physician) were asked to abstract information regarding severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs of specific interest (including pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis, interstitial lung disease, higher indeterminate pulmonary events, death, or discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity) during first line (1L) treatment and second line (2L) for both patients treated with afatinib in 2L and those treated with chemotherapy in 2L. Providers/abstractors were asked only if these specific immune related events occurred.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Real-World Effectiveness of Afatinib (Gilotrif) Following Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung: A Multi-Site Retrospective Chart Review Study in the U.S.

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.