NCT Number: NCT00256867
A Study In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
This study evaluates the effect of medicines for type 2 diabetes and lipids control. This study will require about 6 office visits for lab tests and examinations. All study related medicines and medical examinations will be provided at no cost to the subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–75 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
GSK Investigational Site, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- A clinical diagnosis type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Women must not be pregnant or breastfeeding during the study and 30 days after the study.
- Must sign an informed consent form at the study clinic.
Exclusion criteria
- Severe chronic diseases that would prevent from participating and completing the study by investigator's judgement.
- Use of an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half lives before first dose of study medication.
- Insulin use for > 1 week in past 3 months.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Median Percent Change From Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c in FDC and RSG Monotherapy
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
Median percent change from Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c in FDC and RSG monotherapy was reported. Percent change from Baseline = 100*(exponent [change on log scale]-1). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. The hypothesis of treatment difference was tested at a 0.05 significance level based on two-sided tests. The point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for treatment differences was calculated. Treatment differences were assessed within the context of an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with terms for treatment, gender, current sulfonylurea use (at baseline), country, and Baseline measurement. ANCOVA for LDL-c were performed based on log-transformed data.
Secondary outcomes
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in FDC and SIMV Monotherapy
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Mean change from Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c in FDC and SIMV monotherapy was reported. Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. The hypothesis of treatment difference was tested at a 0.05 significance level based on two-sided tests. The point estimates and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for treatment differences was calculated. Treatment differences were assessed within the context of ANCOVA with terms for treatment, gender, current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline), country, and Baseline measurement.
-
Median Percent Change From Baseline to Week 6 in LDL-c
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 6
Percent change from Baseline = 100*(exponent [change on log scale]-1). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in HbA1c
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 16
Change from Baseline was computed as (Visit value - Baseline value). Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available.
-
Number of Participant With LDL<100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 6
Time frame: Week 6
Number of participants achieving American Diabetes Association (ADA) target of LDL<100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 6 was compared between the FDC groups and the all SIMV group using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
-
Number of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0% or Reduction of HbA1c ≥ 0.7% at Week 16
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Number of participants achieving ADA target of HbA1c < 7.0% or reduction of HbA1c ≥ 0.7% at Week 16 was compared between the FDC groups and the RSG groups groups using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
-
Number of Participants With FPG< 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or Reduction of FPG ≥ 30 mg/dL (1.67 mmol/L) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Number of participants achieving ADA target of FPG< 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) or reduction of FPG ≥ 30 mg/dL (1.67 mmol/L) at Week 16 was compared between the all SIM monotherapy group and the all FDC RSG/SIMV groups using logistic regression with terms for treatment, Baseline value, gender and current sulfonylurea use (at Baseline) in the model.
-
On-Therapy Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Concern Including Systolic, Diastolic Blood Pressure and Heart Rate
Time frame: Up to Week 16
The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
-
On-Therapy Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Baseline assessments were recorded at Visit 3 (Week 0). For a missing Baseline value, the Baseline value were replaced by the last pre-treatment measurement, if available. Change from Baseline was computed as: Visit value - Baseline Value.
-
Number of Participants With Specified Ranges of Red and White Blood Cell Counts Detected in Urine
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Urine samples were observed for red blood cells and white blood cells. the results were reported as cells per high-power field (cells/HPF). The number of participants with cells in urine were reported.
-
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: Up to Week 16
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE include AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
-
Number of of Participants With Laboratory Evaluations of Potential Clinical Concern at Any Time Post-baseline
Time frame: Up to Week 16
The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, chloride, calcium, total protein, albumin, creatinine total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase. The hematology parameters analyzed were hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, total white cell count. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important hematology findings at any visit were reported.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A 16 Week Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a New Medication (GSK523338) to Lower LDL-c and HbA1c in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Important dates
- Study start
- 2005
- Primary completion
- 2006
- Study completion
- 2006
- First posted
- Nov 22, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Jul 2, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Efficacy of Educational Nutrition and Exercise on the Regulation of Appetite Through Exosomes in Type 2 Diabetics
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsUric Acid Lowering Trial in Youth Onset T2D
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsMitochondrial Metabolism and Oxidative Stress in Function of the Physical Exercise and Nutritional Counseling in T2DM
NCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsEffect of Short-Term Beta-Cell Rest in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details