Denosumab
Drugdouble-blind phase: 60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose
NCT Number: NCT01457950
The purpose of this study is to determine if denosumab is effective in increasing bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–90 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Busan, South Korea
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
double-blind phase: 60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose
double-blind phase: placebo subcutaneous injection, single dose
open-label phase: 60mg subcutaneous injection, single dose
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 1
Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 1 and Month 6
Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covarience (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 1/6 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3 and 6
Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Month 6
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 6
Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (<50 or >120 Bits Per Minutes [bpm]), Systolic Blood Pressure (>170 Millimeters of Mercury [mmHg] or <100 mmHg) and Heart rate (>110 mmHg or <50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 6 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Month 6
Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 6 was summarized.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Mean percent change from Baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12
Mean percent change from Month 6 in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 * 100.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Mean percent change from Baseline in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Baseline BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Baseline) divided by the measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12
Mean percent change from Month 6 in total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner. Analyses were performed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment and Month 6 BMD for the skeletal site under consideration as a continuous covariate. Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by the measure at Month 6 * 100.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Baseline=(measure at post-Baseline - measure at Baseline) divided by measure at Baseline * 100.
Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12
Serum carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (s-CTx) I and Serum procollagen type I N propeptide s (s-PINP) are used as serum biomarkers of bone resorption in the assessment of osteoporosis and is measured in units of micrograms (µg)/liters (L). Percentage change from Month 6=(measure at Month 12 - measure at Month 6) divided by measure at Month 6 * 100.
Time frame: From Month 6 to Month 12
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Refer to the general Adverse AE/SAE module for a complete list of AEs and SAEs.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
Vital Sign Changes from Baseline of potential clinical concern for Diastolic Blood Pressure (<50 or >120 Bits Per Minutes [bpm]), Systolic Blood Pressure (>170 Millimeters of Mercury [mmHg] or <100 mmHg) and Heart rate (>110 mmHg or <50 mmHg) are summarized. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Month 12 value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Month 12
Number of participants with positive and negative results for both neutralizing antibodies to denosumab, and for binding antibodies to denosumab at Month 12 was summarized.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Six Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study With a Six Month Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Korean Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05493761
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Thessaloniki, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07717788
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Najaf, Iraq
View Trial DetailsNCT06375668
Bone Density, Low, Bone Diseases
Bytom, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05395091
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
View Trial Details