Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
NCT Number: NCT05934851
The purpose of this study is to compare "Frozen-Section Directed Excision", which has been a proven method of surgery used in dermatology, versus the current, standard method called "Wide Local Excision" to treat high-grade vulvar dysplasia.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
This is a randomized, single-blinded study. The target population is adults ≥ 18 years of age with histological or cytological confirmation of VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS with a planned excisional procedure, with high suspicion by the enrolling investigator that gross surgical margins of ≥ 3 mm can be achieved without laser or other destructive procedures. One group of subjects will be assigned to the Frozen-Section Directed Excision surgery arm and will undergo this procedure. The other group of subjects will be assigned to the Wide Local Excision (standard of care) arm and will undergo this procedure. The randomization will be 1:1, meaning for every subject who gets assigned to the Frozen-Section Directed Excision surgery arm, one will also be assigned to the Wide Local Excision arm. There is a 50% chance of getting randomized to either the Frozen-Section Directed Excision procedure or Wide Local Excision. Information regarding the surgery procedure, the amount of time the surgery procedure takes, and total amount of pain medication required during surgery and while in the surgery recovery area will be collected. The study team will also look at recurrence rates (return of the cancer) in six months, if any other therapies are required, and subject satisfaction related to the surgery, recovery, and sexual function by using questionnaires before and after the procedure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Frozen-Section Directed Excision (FSDE) is a surgical technique with evaluation of margin status during the surgical procedure, similar to the established Mohs Surgical Technique. The use of FSDE may ensure negative margins, decrease unnecessary excision of healthy tissue and has the potential to greatly reduce positive margins.
Other names: FSDE
Standard of care surgical technique utilized for VIN 2, VIN3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS
Time frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of rates of positive margins for VIN 2, VIN 3, VIN 2/3 or High-grade Dysplasia NOS in subjects who undergo standard of care Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: 6 months post resection surgery
Comparison of recurrence rates in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of surgical time in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: At the time of the resection and recovery
Comparison of recovery room time in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: At the time of the resection and recovery
Comparison of narcotic dose required in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: At the time of the resection
Comparison of blood loss in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: 2-week post resection surgery
Comparison of primary wound closure rates in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: 2-weeks and 6 months after resection surgery
Comparison of post-operative quality of life as determined by the SSQ-8 in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: Screening and 6 months after resection surgery
Comparison of sexual function as determined by the FSFI in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Time frame: End of resection surgery
Comparison of wound bed size after surgery in subjects who undergo standard Wide Local Excision versus subjects who undergo Frozen-Section Directed Excision
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Other
A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Study Evaluating the Effect of Frozen-Section Directed Excision on Positive Surgical Margins in High-grade Vulvar Dysplasia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04541784
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT02834013
Acinar Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04708470
Anal Cancer, Anus Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04713618
Anal Carcinoma, Anus Diseases
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details