Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07413627

A Study Evaluating the Contribution of Non-Coplanar Beam Arrangement in Reducing Toxicity in Radiotherapy for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers

Cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) are frequently treated with external beam radiotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Despite major advances achieved with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT/VMAT), irradiation of organs at risk (OARs) remains unavoidable and may lead to acute and late toxicities such as xerostomia, hyposalivation, swallowing disorders, and impaired quality of life. These toxicities are closely related to the dose delivered to salivary glands and other critical structures, and recommended OAR dose constraints are often exceeded to ensure adequate tumor coverage.

Non-coplanar beam arrangements (NCBA) represent a potential strategy to further reduce radiation dose to OARs while maintaining equivalent target coverage. However, their clinical implementation has been limited due to technical complexity and the risk of collisions between the linear accelerator and the patient. The recent implementation of the opto-numerical solution MapRT® (VisionRT), based on three-dimensional modeling of the patient and the linear accelerator, allows safe and reliable identification of feasible non-coplanar beam trajectories. Retrospective dosimetric analyses conducted at our institution have demonstrated significant dose reductions to several OARs in UADT cancer patients treated with NCBA compared with conventional coplanar beam arrangements, without compromising tumor dose coverage.

BaReTox is a prospective, open-label, randomized, single-center pilot trial designed to evaluate the clinical impact of non-coplanar beam radiotherapy on treatment-related toxicities and quality of life in patients with non-operated, non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Adult patients eligible for curative-intent bilateral radiotherapy, with known HPV (p16) status, are randomized to receive either standard coplanar radiotherapy (control arm) or non-coplanar radiotherapy (experimental arm), with or without concomitant chemotherapy. All patients receive a standard photobiomodulation protocol during radiotherapy.

The primary objective is to compare the change in head and neck cancer-specific quality of life between baseline and three months after completion of radiotherapy, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire, focusing on swallowing, social eating, and dry mouth domains. Secondary objectives include comparison of acute and late toxicities graded according to CTCAE version 5.0, assessment of salivary function by sialometry, evaluation of global and disease-specific quality of life over time, progression-free survival, feasibility of delivering non-coplanar radiotherapy, dosimetric impact on organs at risk, and evaluation of radiation-induced lymphopenia.

This pilot study aims to provide clinical proof of concept for the benefit of non-coplanar beam radiotherapy in reducing toxicity and improving quality of life in patients with UADT cancers

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient diagnosed with non-operated, non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx, histologically confirmed, with p16 status determined by immunohistochemistry, and indicated for curative bilateral radiotherapy, with or without concomitant chemotherapy
  • Patient scheduled to receive standard photobiomodulation treatment protocol during radiotherapy
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • Presence of xerostomia < 1 according to CTCAE v6.0 at pre-inclusion
  • Patient able to provide informed consent and capable of complying with study follow-up, including visits for completion of quality of life questionnaires and salivary tests
  • Patient affiliated with a social security system or equivalent

Inclusion criteria

(RECOARD 2.0 recommendations) to be confirmed with the information provided by the simulation/plan treatment CT scan :

  • Exceedance of a dose constraint for at least one Organ at Risk (OAR) as defined below with a coplanar beam arrangement :
  • The average dose delivered to at least one parotid gland must be greater than 26 Grays, and/or => 65% of the oral cavity receives a dose greater than 30 Grays, and/or
  • The average dose delivered to at least one submandibular gland must be greater than 32 Grays, and/or
  • The average dose delivered to the larynx exceeds 43.5 Grays.

Exclusion criteria

  • Other head and neck locations than the oral cavity and oropharynx, and/or a surgically treated UADT cancer, and/or radiotherapy treatment already started.
  • Histologies other than squamous cell carcinoma
  • Tumors requiring only unilateral irradiation.
  • Non-curative irradiation and/or metastatic patient
  • Double tumor localization
  • Previous history of head and neck radiotherapy.
  • Inability to comply with study follow-up visits and medical assessments due to geographical, social, or psychological reasons.
  • Individuals under legal custody or guardianship (including curatorship).
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (pregnancy test required at inclusion).

Treatment and study plan

Coplanar External Beam Radiotherapy

Radiation

Patients receive external beam radiotherapy using a coplanar beam arrangement (standard approach) to treat squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx. Treatment is delivered according to routine clinical protocols with curative intent.

Non-Coplanar External Beam Radiotherapy

Radiation

Patients receive external beam radiotherapy using a non-coplanar beam arrangement, planned with 3D modeling (MapRT®) to reduce dose to organs at risk while maintaining tumor coverage. Treatment is delivered according to routine clinical protocols with curative intent.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life (QOL) after Radiotherapy with Coplanar vs Non-Coplanar Beam Arrangement

    Time frame: From baseline (before radiotherapy) to 3 months after the completion of radiotherapy.

    This outcome measures the change in quality of life (QOL) from baseline to three months post-radiotherapy using the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Head and Neck Cancer Module). The focus is on swallowing, social eating, and dry mouth symptoms, comparing two different radiotherapy techniques: coplanar external beam radiotherapy (Control Arm) and non-coplanar external beam radiotherapy (Experimental Arm) in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx.

    This is a symptom assessment scale. A high score indicates a more unfavourable situation (presence of symptoms). A low score indicates few symptoms.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

David DT THIBOUW, Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

03 45 34 81 07

Emilie ER REDERSTORFF, Project Manager

CONTACT

[email protected]

03 45 34 81 16

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Pilot Study Evaluating the Contribution of Non-Coplanar Beam Arrangement in Reducing Toxicity in Radiotherapy for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers

Acronym: BaReTox

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.