Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02119351
The objective of this post-market, prospective study is to evaluate the clinical acceptability, blood leakage, risk for blood exposure, need for digital compression, insertion success, and clinical utility of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter compared to standard hospital PIVCs currently being used.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Safety peripheral IV catheter with a blood control feature
Safety peripheral IV catheter with no blood control feature
Time frame: Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion
Demonstrate non-inferiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC for ratings of clinical acceptability. Clinicians will agree or disagree that the device was clinically acceptable for the insertion.
Time frame: Clinicians will report if blood leakage occurred immediately after the catheter insertion
Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control in preventing blood leakage from the catheter hub during insertion.
Time frame: Clinicians will report on the ability of the PIVC to eliminate blood exposure immediately after catheter insertion
Demonstrate superiority of the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter compared to the control PIVC in eliminating the clinician's risk of blood exposure during the insertion process.
Time frame: Clinicians will report if the insertion was successful immediately after performing insertion
Demonstrate the insertion success rate of the ViaValve™ I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC. Insertion success defined as a catheter confirmed successfully placed within the selected vessel in 3 or fewer venipuncture attempts.
Time frame: Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion
Demonstrate that the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC in eliminating the clinician's need to use digital compression during the insertion process. Clinicians will agree or disagree the device eliminates the need for digital compression after each PIVC insertion.
Time frame: Clinicians will provide the rating immediately after performing the insertion
Demonstrate that the ViaValve™ Safety I.V. Catheter is non-inferior to the control PIVC in seven measures of ease of use. Clinicians will agree or disagree with seven statements regarding ease of use/clinical utility.
Smiths Medical, ASD, Inc.
Industry
A Post-market, Randomized Study Evaluating the Clinical Performance of the ViaValve™ Safety IV Catheter
Acronym: ViaValve-001
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06668766
Difficult Intravenous Access, Disease Attributes
Albany, New York, United States
View Trial Details