Lindus Health Limited
New York, 10017, United States
NCT Number: NCT06654089
The purpose of this study is to determine how Emergen-C use can improve quality of life (QoL) in a real-world setting to help consumers and healthcare professionals understand the benefits of taking Emergen-C on a routine or daily basis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
New York, 10017, United States
This will be a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the over-time effects of 12-weeks Emergen-C supplementation on QoL parameters in a real-world setting. This study will be entirely decentralized, and participants will not be required to physically attend any on-site visits. All study data will be collected remotely through a study platform using the participant's personal mobile device, tablet or computer. Sufficient participants will be screened to enroll approximately 300 eligible participants (approximately 150 participants per group) and approximately 240 participants are expected to complete the study (approximately 120 participants per group).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A dietary supplement powder containing vitamin C, zinc, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, folate, and manganese.
To ensure proper blinding, the placebo was formulated to be indistinguishable from Emergen-C in taste, appearance, and other sensory characteristics. The placebo therefore contained fructose, and the electrolytes potassium, magnesium, calcium, and sodium.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. General fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Physical fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reverse scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Reduced activity domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Reduced motivation domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Mental fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. General fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Physical fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reverse scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Reduced activity domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Reduced motivation domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Mental fatigue domain had 4 items. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 4 to 20 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline score from score at Week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The MFI was a 20-item scale designed to evaluate five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, and mental fatigue. Participants answered how they felt about each item, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). Positively phrased items were reversely scored and negatively phrased items were scored at face value. Each individual item score was ranged from 1 to 5 where lower scores indicated lower level of fatigue. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual MFI item score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants answered 2 QoL questions related to Family support domain and indicated how they felt about each statement, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 2 to 10 where QoL lower scores indicated better quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual question score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants answered 2 QoL questions related to resilience domain and indicated how they felt about each statement, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 2 to 10 where QoL lower scores indicated better quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual question score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Participants answered 2 QoL questions related to 'Ability to relax and unwind' domain and indicated how they felt about each statement, on a scale of 1 (yes, that is true) to 5 (no, that is not true). The total domain score was calculated by summation of the scores of individual items and was ranged from 2 to 10 where QoL lower scores indicated better quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the individual question score at Baseline from post-Baseline score at indicated timepoints. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in quality of life.
HALEON
Industry
A Real-World Evidence Study Evaluating Quality of Life Parameters Following Use of Emergen-C
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07442110
At Home Setting, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bordj Bou Arreridj, Wilaya de Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria
View Trial DetailsNCT04552002
Dietary Supplements
Dammam, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT05710614
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT05924633
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Dublin, Ireland
View Trial Details