PSNS
DeviceThe nasal spray was self-administered by study subjects at a maximum daily dose of 16 puffs per day, distributed over 1-2 puffs per nostril 2-4 times per day, depending on symptom severity and their alleviation.
NCT Number: NCT06817967
The purpose of the study was to test if the PROPONENT® nasal spray works, if it is safe, and if it helps participants to stop using addictive nasal decongestant sprays. To be able to take part in the study, participants had to be at least 18 years old, suffer from a condition called "rebound nasal congestion" or "rhinitis medicamentosa (RM)", and be dependent on nasal decongestants. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either PROPONENT® nasal spray or a nasal spray with physiological saline during the 4-week study treatment period. Neither the participants nor their doctor knew which they were receiving. In total, 194 participants took part in this study in several hospitals in Norway.
The study included three visits to the study center: one at the beginning and one at the end of the treatment period, and a follow-up visit approximately 4 weeks after the end of study treatment. During the study treatment period, participants used 1-2 puffs of study nasal spray in each nostril in the morning and evening. They could use the nasal spray additional times if they felt the need due to nasal congestion, up to a maximum of 16 puffs a day. During they study treatment period, participants were asked to measure every morning and evening how much air they could maximally inhale through their nose using a simple instrument called Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) meter. At the end of each week of the treatment period, participants were asked to report how bad their nasal problems had been during the past week using electronic questionnaires. At the follow-up visit, participants were asked if they could still manage without the decongestant nasal sprays they had been using before entering the study, and if they felt that they had become addicted to the study nasal spray.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Haukeland Universitetssykehus, Departments of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Helse Bergen, Bergen, Norway
This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study to evaluate Proponent Solution - Nasal Spray (PSNS) compared to sodium chloride 0.9% (Isotonic Saline Nasal Spray [ISNS]) for treatment of nasal congestion symptoms during RM while weaning from direct-acting alpha-adrenergic agonists, such as xylometazoline or oxymetazoline. The study aimed to recruit approximately 200 subjects (actual: 194 subjects) who should receive 4 weeks of treatment with PSNS or ISNS to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability.
Before study start, prospective subjects received a telephone call by the study personnel where they were informed about the study and asked to make notes of their daily use of xylometazoline or oxymetazoline each evening (including the number of doses used) for 7 days prior to start of study treatment. This data was transferred to an electronic diary (eDiary) for all subjects that were included in the study. Prospective subjects attended an enrolment visit (Visit 1) at the investigational site, where informed consent was discussed and signed. Eligible subjects were randomised (1:1) to receive the investigational device product (PSNS) or the comparator (ISNS), and self-administered the first dose of study treatment under supervision of the study personnel.
During the 4-week treatment period (28 days, -1 to +5 days), subjects self-administered the study nasal spray at a maximum dose of 16 puffs per day distributed over 1-2 puffs applied into each nostril 2-4 times daily. Subjects were asked to report daily their objective morning and evening PNIF meter results in an eDiary on a smartphone or laptop both before and 10 minutes after administration of 1-2 puffs of either PSNS or the comparator. Each week, subjects had to fill out electronic questionnaires assessing their nasal congestion/obstruction using validated scoring systems (NOSE and NOVAS-score). At 21-35 days after the end of study treatment (Visit 3), each subject was asked to complete a follow-up registration in the eDiary. During this assessment, it was also assessed whether the subject had become addicted to/physically dependent on the study nasal spray.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The nasal spray was self-administered by study subjects at a maximum daily dose of 16 puffs per day, distributed over 1-2 puffs per nostril 2-4 times per day, depending on symptom severity and their alleviation.
The nasal spray was self-administered by study subjects at a maximum daily dose of 16 puffs per day, distributed over 1-2 puffs per nostril 2-4 times per day, depending on symptom severity and their alleviation.
Time frame: Day 0 (randomisation, start of treatment) until end of treatment (Day 28, -1 day until + 5 days)
Time frame: Day 0 (randomisation, start of treatment) until end of treatment (Day 28, -1 day until + 5 days)
This was based on the self-reported use of xylometazoline/oxymetazoline.
Time frame: Last week of the study treatment period (Day 27-33)
The PNIF meter is a lightweight and compact instrument that provides an objective result of nasal patency. Study subjects were asked to take three repeated PNIF measurements at each time point, and to record the highest result in their eDiary. The PNIF score was measured in litres per minute (L/min). Values above 125 L/min were considered out-of-range. Higher values indicate better nasal patency.
Time frame: Last week of the study treatment period (Day 27-33)
This was assessed using the validated questionnaire Nasal Obstruction Visual Analogue Scale (NOVAS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 corresponds to "no nasal obstruction" and 10 corresponds to "maximum nasal obstruction".
Time frame: Last week of the study treatment period (Day 27-33)
This was assessed using the validated questionnaire Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE). The total score ranges from 0 to 20, and a higher score indicates more severe nasal obstruction.
Time frame: From randomisation to end of study treatment (Day 27-33)
The PNIF meter is a lightweight and compact instrument that provides an objective result of nasal patency. Study subjects were asked to take three repeated PNIF measurements at each time point, and to record the highest result in their eDiary. The PNIF score was measured in L/min. Values above 125 L/min were considered out-of-range. Higher values indicate better nasal patency.
Time frame: From randomisation to end of study treatment (Day 27-33)
This was assessed using the validated questionnaire Nasal Obstruction Visual Analogue Scale (NOVAS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 corresponds to "no nasal obstruction" and 10 corresponds to "maximum nasal obstruction".
Time frame: From randomisation to end of study treatment (Day 27-33)
This was assessed using the validated questionnaire Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE). The total score ranges from 0 to 20, and a higher score indicates more severe nasal obstruction.
Time frame: From randomisation to end of study i.e., Day 56 (visit window: Day 49 to Day 68)
Time frame: Visit 3 (follow-up registration), i.e., Day 56 (visit window: Day 49 to Day 68)
The addiction score was designed as a yes/no question.
Pharma Nordic AS
Industry
A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre Parallel-group Study Comparing a Medical Device: Proponent Solution - Nasal Spray (PSNS) With Comparator (Sodium Chloride 0.9%) for Treatment of Nasal Congestion Symptoms (in Adults) During Rhinitis Medicamentosa While Weaning From Direct-acting Alpha-adrenergic Agonists, Such as Xylometazoline or Oxymetazoline
Acronym: PROUD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04898764
Rhinitis Medicamentosa
Ghent, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT00487032
Allergic Rhinitis, Hypersensitivity
Perth, Perthshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details