Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00377234

A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis.

This 2 arm crossover study will evaluate patient reported preference for either once monthly Boniva (150mg p.o.) or once weekly risedronate (35mg p.o.). Patients with post-menopausal osteoporosis will be randomized to receive Boniva for 3 calendar months or risedronate for 12 weeks; they will then cross over to receive the alternative treatment for a further 12 weeks/3 months. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

55 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ambulatory women with post-menopausal osteoporosis;
  • patients who are bisphosphonate-naive, or who have previously received oral daily or i.v. bisphosphonate therapy (fulfilling certain criteria detailed in the protocol).

Exclusion criteria

  • malignant disease diagnosed within previous 10 years (except for successfully resected basal cell cancer;) breast cancer within previous 20 years;
  • inability to stand or sit upright for at least 60 minutes;
  • disease/disorder/treatment with drugs known to influence bone metabolism.

Treatment and study plan

risedronate

Drug

35mg po weekly for 12 weeks

ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]

Drug

150mg po monthly for 3 months

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosing

    Time frame: at 6 months

    Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronate

    Time frame: within 6 months

    Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.

  2. Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms

    Time frame: within 3 months

    Patients were given a diary in which to record their upper GI events during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The diary was to be completed weekly and the occurrence of symptoms and their intensity recorded using a pre-defined list.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

    Time frame: 3 months

    During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

  4. Median Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)

    Time frame: 3 months

    During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Investigate Patient Preference on Dosing in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treated With Once Monthly Ibandronate and Once Weekly Risedronate. A Six Month, Two-sequence and Two-period Crossover Study.

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Sep 18, 2006
Registry last updated
Aug 1, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.