Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03740919

A Study Comparing LY900014 to Insulin Lispro (Humalog) in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

The reason for this study is to compare the study drug LY900014 to insulin lispro (Humalog) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Universitätsklinikum Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • T1D for at least 6 months at the screening visit.
  • Have been treated with only one of the following rapid-acting insulin analogs as part of an multiple daily injection regimen for at least the last 90 days prior to the screening visit:
  • insulin lispro U-100, or
  • insulin aspart
  • insulin glulisine or
  • fast acting insulin aspart
  • Have been treated with only one of the following basal insulins for at least the last 90 days prior to the screening visit:
  • insulin glargine U-100 (once a day [QD] or twice a day [BID]), or
  • insulin detemir U-100 (QD or BID), or
  • insulin degludec U-100 (QD)
  • Have a HbA1c value ≤ 9.9% at the screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

  • Have current hypoglycemic unawareness or have had more than 1 episode of severe hypoglycemia within 6 months prior to the screening visit.
  • Have had more than 1 emergency room visit or hospitalization due to poor glucose control within 6 months prior to the screening visit.
  • Have been on a treatment regimen that includes regular human insulin, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), Afrezza® (insulin human) inhalation powder, any premixed insulins or use of diluted insulins within 90 days prior to the screening visit.

Treatment and study plan

LY900014

Drug

Administered SC

Other names: Ultra-Rapid Lispro

Insulin Lispro

Drug

Administered SC

Other names: Humalog, LY275585

insulin glargine

Drug

Administered SC

insulin degludec

Drug

Administered SC

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Efficacy Estimand at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline in HbA1c was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) and includes fixed class effects of treatment, strata (pooled country, type of basal insulin, and age group), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline value. An unstructured covariance structure will be used to model the within-participant errors.

    The Efficacy estimand included data collected prior to permanent discontinuation of study drug through Week 26.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Postprandial) at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline in HbA1c postprandial was analyzed using (MMRM and includes fixed class effects of treatment, strata (pooled country, type of basal insulin, and age group), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of baseline value. An unstructured covariance structure will be used to model the within-participant errors.

    The Efficacy estimand included data collected prior to permanent discontinuation of study drug through Week 26.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Documented Post-dose Hypoglycemic Events Within 1 and 2 Hours After the Prandial Dose

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 26

    Documented post-dose hypoglycemia <54 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and ≤ 70 mg/dL that occurred 1 and 2 hours after prandial dose.

  3. Rate of Documented Post-dose Hypoglycemic Events Within 1 and 2 Hours After the Prandial Dose

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 26

    Documented post-dose hypoglycemia event is an event of blood glucose of < 54 mg/dL and ≤70 mg/dL that occurred within 1 and 2 hours after the prandial dose. The rate of documented hypoglycemia was estimated by a negative binomial regression including treatment and age group as independent variable and number of episodes as dependent variables with log (exposure/365.25 days) as the offset in the model.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Documented Hypoglycemic Events

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 26

    Documented hypoglycemia is defined as <54 mg/dL and ≤70 mg/dL, respectively.

  5. Rate of Documented Hypoglycemia Events

    Time frame: Week 0 through Week 26

    Documented hypoglycemia is defined as a hypoglycemic event of blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL or <54 mg/dL. The rate of documented hypoglycemia was estimated by negative binomial regression including treatment and age group as independent variables and number of episodes as dependent variable with log (exposure/365.25 days) as the offset in the model.

  6. Rate of Severe Hypoglycemia

    Time frame: Week 0 through Week 26

    Severe hypoglycemia: during these episodes, participants have an altered mental status and cannot assist in their own care, may be semiconscious or unconscious, or experience coma with or without seizures, and require assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.

    The rate of severe hypoglycemia per 100 years was calculated as: 100 times the total number of severe hypoglycemia episodes within the period divided by total exposure (in year) for all participants within the treatment group.

  7. Change From Baseline in Insulin Dose at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline in insulin dose was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) and includes fixed class effects of treatment, strata (pooled country, type of basal insulin, age group, and HbA1c stratum (≤8.0%, >8.0%)), baseline value, visit and treatment-by-visit interaction. An unstructured covariance structure was used to model the within-participant errors.

  8. Percentage of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0% and <7.5%

    Time frame: Week 26

    Percentage of participants with HbA1c < 7.0% and <7.5% was analyzed using a longitudinal logistic regression with repeated measurements conducted by a generalized linear mixed model including independent variables of treatment, baseline HbA1c value, visit, baseline HbA1c-by-visit interaction, and treatment-by-visit interaction. An unstructured covariance structure was used.

  9. Change From Baseline in 7-Point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Values at Week 26

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline in 7-point SMBG values were analyzed using MMRM and includes fixed class effects of treatment, strata (pooled country, type of basal insulin, and age group, and HbA1c stratum (≤8.0%, >8.0%)) baseline value, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction. An unstructured covariance structure was used to model the within-participant errors.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eli Lilly and Company

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of LY900014 to Humalog With an Open-Label Postprandial LY900014 Treatment Group in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

Acronym: PRONTO-Peds

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Nov 14, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 24, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.