Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04147442

A Standard Music Program Compared to an Optimized Music Program

The trial will test whether a standard music program that is an offset to the general program provides the same benefit as a music program that is individually customized for each test participant. The trial seeks to investigate the benefit received by musicians that regularly play an instrument and belong to an organized music group or orchestra instead of people that listen to music.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Hearing Loss Ear Diseases Hearing Disorders Nervous System Diseases Neurologic Manifestations Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Sensation Disorders Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Bernafon AG

Bern, 3018, Switzerland

About this study

The initial goal of hearing aids is to amplify speech and facilitate speech understanding especially in noise. Besides speech difficulty, people with hearing loss also report a reduced enjoyment of music. The hearing aid settings used for amplifying speech often have adverse effects on music.

For this study, the sponsor will carry out testing with participants with hearing loss to compare dedicated music programs. The current study will compare the standard music program available in the software to one that is fine-tuned for each subject. The hearing aids that will be used for the study are certified by the European Conformity and have been on the market for almost one year. The goal is to determine whether musicians will perceive a difference and prefer a fine-tuned music program over the default music program in real-life situations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All classifications of hearing loss (sensorineural, conductive, mixed)
  • If conductive or mixed, approval for amplification by a physician is needed
  • All shapes of hearing loss (flat, sloping, reverse slope, notch)
  • Severity ranging from mild to profound
  • German or French speaking
  • Play a musical instrument
  • Ability and willingness to sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Normal hearing
  • Contraindications for amplification
  • Active ear disease
  • Don't play an instrument
  • Inability to follow the study procedures due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, or other cognitive problems
  • Unable to attend study appointments due to reduced mobility
  • Reduced ability to describe auditory impressions and usage of hearing aids
  • Uncooperative so that it is ot possible to record a valid audiogram
  • Severely reduced dexterity
  • Central hearing disorders
  • Sponsor employees
  • Family members of employees of the Sponsor

Treatment and study plan

Hearing aid with fine-tuned and standard programs

Device

A digital, wireless hearing aid is programmed specifically to each subject's hearing loss and fitted with both a program that is fine-tuned for their specific music playing as well as the standard music program that uses pre-determined settings.

Other names: Viron 9 mini receiver-in-the-ear hearing aid

Primary outcomes

  1. Preference Rating

    Time frame: 20 days

    Subjects will answer a questionnaire that asks them to choose which program that they preferred. The questionnaire gives Program 1 or Program 2 as the choices as well as a no Preference option for those that did not notice a difference between the two. The percentage of subjects that chose each Program will be calculated to determine if more preferred the optimized music program.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sound Perception Test - Pitch

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of Meter with pitch (in Hz). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took higher Levels of Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

  2. Music Sound Quality Rating

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound quality of the devices when listening/playing music will be rated using a questionnaire. The questionnaire asks subjects to rate various aspects of the sound using a 5-point scale with 1 being the worst answer and 5 being the best. The questionnaire will be answered for Program 1 and Program 2. The scores for each question will be averaged across subjects and the difference between the two programs calculated to determine if one music program results in better sound quality scores. A positive score is in favor of the fine-tuned program and a negative score would be in favor of the standard program. They will test Program 1 and Program 2 during the same period as they have the ability to use a button on the Hearing aid to switch between programs.

  3. Sound Perception Test - Duration

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of duration (in milliseconds). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took longer in milliseconds to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

  4. Sound Perception Test - Level

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. It tests the overall perception of Meter with Level (in decibels). A lower score is better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

  5. Sound Perception Test - Brightness

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the brightness (measured in dB). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

  6. Sound Perception Test - Attack

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the attack (measured in Hz). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in Hz to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

  7. Sound Perception Test - Spectral Irregularities

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The sound perception test is called the Adaptive Music Perception test. It is tested in the lab with digitally synthesized recordings of components of tones. The perception of the Timber of music is tested by the spectral irregularities (measured in dB). Lower scores are better. A higher score means that it took higher levels in dB to perceive a difference between musical notes.The subjects are tested in the unaided, aided with the standard program, and aided with the test (optimized) program. The scores will be averaged and analyzed to determine if one program results in better (lower) test scores.

Other outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Device Related Adverse Events

    Time frame: 0,10, and 20 days

    The number of Device Related Adverse Events will be monitored and totaled. Each Adverse Event is measured using a severity scale of: mild, moderate, or severe. The causality is measured with a scale of: Not related, unlikely, possible, probable, and causal relationship.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bernafon AG

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Clinical Investigation Comparing a Standard Hearing Aid Fitting Protocol and a Fitting Protocol Optimized for Musicians

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 1, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 16, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.