Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01976663

A Safety and Effectiveness Study of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC Versus Control for Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds

A prospective, multicenter, within-subject controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC versus Control for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center P.C., Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 2 visible moderate to severe nasolabial folds
  • Agree to refrain from undergoing other anti-wrinkle/volumizing treatments in the lower two-thirds of the face for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Undergone facial tissue augmentation with dermal fillers in the lower two-thirds of the face within the past 12 months
  • Undergone facial tissue augmentation with fat injections, botulinum toxin injections in the lower two-thirds of the face, mesotherapy, or cosmetic facial procedures in the face or neck within the past 6 months
  • Received semi-permanent fillers or permanent facial implants anywhere in the lower face

Treatment and study plan

JUVEDERM VOLIFT® XC

Device

Up to 4 mLs JUVEDERM VOLIFT® XC injected intradermally in one NLF (total; including initial and touch-up treatments) and up to 4 mLs JUVEDERM VOLIFT XC is allowed for repeat treatment. For asymmetric correction, only the more severe NLF is eligible for asymmetric correction.

Control

Device

Up to 4 mLs Control injected intradermally in opposite NLF (total; including initial and touch-up treatments). Up to 4 mLs JUVEDERM VOLIFT XC is allowed for asymmetry correction and up to 4 mLs JUVEDERM VOLIFT XC is allowed for repeat treatment. Only the more severe NLF is eligible for asymmetric correction.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-Point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

    Nasolabial fold severity is assessed by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None [no wrinkle] to 4=Extreme [very deep wrinkle, redundant fold]). Mean change from baseline in NFLSS is defined as score at baseline minus score at Month 6. A negative number change from baseline indicated improvement and a positive number change from baseline indicated worsening.

  2. Percentage of Nasolabial Folds With ≥1-Point Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

    Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None [no wrinkle] to 4=Extreme [very deep wrinkle, redundant fold]). The percentage of nasolabial folds with ≥1-point improvement from baseline (i.e., decrease in severity) are reported.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Nasolabial Folds With ≥1-Point Improvement

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

    Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Evaluating Investigator on the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (ranging from 0=None [no wrinkle] to 4=Extreme [very deep wrinkle, redundant fold]). The percentage of nasolabial folds with ≥1-point improvement from baseline (i.e., decrease in severity) are reported.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Nasolabial Folds FACE-Q Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

    Subjects evaluate nasolabial folds on the 5-item Nasolabial Folds module of the FACE-Q questionnaire. Responses to the 5 items are combined to create a scale score that ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates that the subject is extremely bothered and 100 indicates that the subject is not all bothered by the appearance of the nasolabial fold. Change from baseline is defined as the score at Month 12 minus the baseline score. A positive number change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative number change from baseline indicates a worsening.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Allergan

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Within-subject Controlled Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC Versus Control for the Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 6, 2013
Registry last updated
May 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.