St. Vincent's Hospital
Dublin, D4, Ireland
NCT Number: NCT05074069
Patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy undergo radical procedures, necessitate organ reconstruction. Little is known about the preferred methods of gynaecological organ reconstruction in the context of pelvic exenteration. This review aims to identify which methods are commonly used and what outcomes are associated with each technique in order to further guide future practice.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Observational
Dublin, D4, Ireland
The mainstay of treatment for patients with locally advanced pelvic malignancy is radical surgical excision combined, with (neo)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy where appropriate. The primary objective is to obtain a negative resection margin (R0) in order to achieve long-term survival. Centralisation of care and refinements in surgical technique have enabled surgeons specializing in advanced pelvic oncology to embark upon more aggressive approaches to accomplishing an R0 resection.
With improved oncological outcomes has come an increased focus on quality-of-life (QoL), functional sequelae and patient experience and survivorship. Adequate experience and proficiency with reconstructive techniques has become one of the key components for surgeons practicing in pelvic oncology. Reconstructive procedures should be undertaken with the goals of improving wound healing, reducing morbidity and restoring anatomic form and function. These factors are of utmost importance in the context of pelvic exenteration, where wound complications are prevalent as a result of a larger pelvic dead space and the potential for contamination. Adverse impact on sexual function following pelvic surgery is also common where the autonomic nerves are involved. This is further compounded by the need to resect part or all of the vulvovaginar complex as part of an extirpative procedure, with resultant declines in QoL and overall psychosexual wellbeing.
A number of methods have been proposed for reconstruction of the pelvic floor and vulva/vagina in females, including skin grafting, skin flaps, fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps, as well as the formation of a neovagina in specific circumstances. Thereis a paucity of data with regard to the optimal approach to gynaecological organ reconstruction, with the majority of the literature referring to single-centre, retrospective series. This review sought to assess the preferred methods for gynaecological reconstruction at an international level, the clinical and technical particulars leading to the choice of each method and the short-term outcomes associated with each technique.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Methods of vulvovaginal reconstruction, e.g. flap formation, neovagina formation
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Number of patients experiencing short-term (up to 30 days postoperatively) morbidity
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Number of patients with each method of reconstruction
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Number of patients with superficial wound infections, abscess, dehiscence by type of reconstruction
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Dyspareunia
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Return to intercourse
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Chronic pelvic pain by type of reconstruction
Time frame: July 2016 - July 2021
Radicality of resection, e.g. R0, R1 or R2, and histological subtypes
St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland
Other
PelvEx 7: A Review of Functional and Surgical Outcomes of Gynaecological Reconstruction in the Context of Pelvic Exenteration
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05269186
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
La Roche-sur-Yon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04070950
Behavior, Neoplasms
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06576908
Abdominal Cancer, Head and Neck Cancer
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04344899
Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details