Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01280656

A Retrospective Study to Assess the Impact of the Use of Interferon in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C (DECISION)

This retrospective study will assess the sustained virologic response and the safety of two different interferons (pegylated or conventional) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Data will be collected for 24 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >/=18 years and <70 years of age
  • Diagnosis of hepatitis C
  • Assessment of viral load prior to treatment (mandatory for genotype 1 only)
  • Liver biopsy
  • Co-morbidities data
  • Use of interferon (pegylated or conventional) and ribavirin to treat hepatitis C infection genotype 2 and 3 and pegylated interferon plus ribavirin to treat hepatitis C infection genotype 1
  • Above mentioned treatment started between 01-Sep-2007 and 31-Aug-2008

Exclusion criteria

  • Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus
  • Co-infection with hepatitis B virus
  • Presence of hepatocarcinoma
  • Patients submitted to hemodialysis
  • Organ transplant patients

Treatment and study plan

Conventional Interferon

Drug

Conventional interferon according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

Peginterferon alfa-2a

Drug

Peginterferon alfa-2a according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

Peginterferon alfa-2b

Drug

Peginterferon alfa-2b according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

Ribavirin

Drug

Ribavirin according to the standard of care and aligned with the local prescription instructions

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 60

    Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response at 12 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 international units/milliliter (IU/mL) HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). EOT= Week 48. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 72

    SVR was defined as virological response at 24 weeks after EOT, EOT= Week 48. Virologic response was either defined as having undetectable (that is, no hepatitis C virus Ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] was detected in the participants' plasma samples) or less than 50 IU/mL HCV RNA (that is, the participants' plasma samples contained traces of HCV RNA at a concentration below the limit of quantification of the viral load assay or no HCV RNA was detected in the samples). Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

  2. Number of Participants With Interferon Dose Reduction Rates in Function of the Interferon Type Being Used

    Time frame: At Week 24

    The number of participants with Interferon dose reduction rates in function of the interferon type being used are reported

  3. Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    An early virologic response (EVR) was defined as a HCV-RNA decrease of at least two logarithmic scales (2 Log) or 100 times the pretreatment value or non-detection at Week 12 of treatment period.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response Treated at Interferon Application Centers and Treated at Home

    Time frame: At Week 60 (SVR 12) and Week 72 (SVR 24)

    The percentage of participants with SVR-12 and SVR-24 treated at interferon application centers (IAC) and treated at home are presented.

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Were Treated at Interferon Application Centers and at Home and Discontinued Treatment

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    The percentage of participants who were treated at interferon application centers and at home and who discontinued treatment is presented. Participants who did not have viral load assessment at Week 12 were considered treatment failures, except in the specific case where the lack of assessment was not due to treatment shortening in function of response guided therapy.

  6. Mean Percentage Reduction of Hemoglobin in Treatment Responders and Treatment Non-Responders

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    The average percentage reduction of hemoglobin (Hb) in treatment responders and treatment non-responders between the conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a plus and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented. Participants with undetectable HCV RNA at specified time points (Weeks 4/12/18/24/48) were considered as treatment responders. Participants with positive viral load (detectable HCV RNA) at end of treatment regardless of the treatment duration were considered as treatment non-responders.

  7. Percentage of Participants With Rapid Virologic Response at Week 4

    Time frame: At Week 4

    Rapid virologic response was defined as qualitative or quantitative HCV-RNA (viral load) undetectable (below the lower limit of detection) at Week 4 of treatment period.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response at End of Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Virologic response at EOT was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at EOT (regardless in which week treatment was concluded). EOT = Week 48.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse up to Week 72

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    Virologic relapse was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment and detectable HCV-RNA at the last follow-up assessment available. If the participant was a responder at end of treatment and was not submitted to any viral load assessment during the follow-up period, he was considered a relapser.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Null Response or No Responder at End of Treatment

    Time frame: At Week 48

    Null response or no responders were defined as those participants presenting positive viral load at EOT (regardless of the treatment duration). EOT= Week 48.

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    The percentage of participants with treatment discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AE) between conventional group, peginterferon alfa-2a and peginterferon alfa-2b is presented.

  12. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Any Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a significant medical event in the investigator's judgment or requires intervention to prevent one or other of these outcomes.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Interferon (Pegylated or Not) in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in Brazil (DECISION)

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jan 21, 2011
Registry last updated
Nov 29, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.