Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01866150

A Retrospective, Observational Chart Review of Biologics in Monotherapy Versus the Combination Biologic Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

This cross-sectional, non-interventional, retrospective chart review will compare the efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy and biologic and methotrexate combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to prior treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including methotrexate. Data will be collected from patients who have been on first-line biologic treatment for at least 6 months.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Cambridge, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis by a rheumatologist
  • Patients who have responded inadequately to methotrexate or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and are being prescribed a biologic in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate and other classical DMARDs as per NICE guidelines

Exclusion criteria

  • Primary diagnosis of a condition other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Current treatment with a biologic in combination without methotrexate
  • Prior treatment with an experimental agent for rheumatoid arthritis

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joint Count (DAS-28) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at 6 Months (DAS28<2.6)

    Time frame: Month 6

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 equals (=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * the natural logarithm [ln] ESR in millimeters per hour [mm/h]) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at 3 Months and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    Time frame: Month 3 and the last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. DAS28 = (0.56 * √ of TJC) + (0.28 * √ of SJC) + (0.70 * ln ESR in mm/h) + (0.014 * participant's global assessment of disease activity). DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Low Disease Activity (LDA) (DAS28-ESR <3.2) at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.

    Time frame: Months 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6. LDA was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2.

  3. Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Months 3, 6 and at The Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or C Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

  4. Percentage of Participants by Category of DAS28 Score and Timepoint

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and either ESR or CRP for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

  5. Duration of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    Drug retention was defined as the total duration of time in months the participant was on treatment (combination therapy or monotherapy). The duration was the time in months between the start date of biologic therapy to the date of most recent visit.

  6. Average Methotrexate Dose of Participants on Biological Combination Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline up to last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

  7. Change From Baseline in Total Number of Tender Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The 28 joints to be assessed for tenderness were shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of tender joints ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.

  8. Change From Baseline in Total Number of Swollen Joints at Months 3 and 6 and at the Last Visit After Initiation of First-Line Biologic Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, 6 and last visit (maximum 147.1 months for monotherapy and 189.1 months for combination therapy)

    The 28 joints to be assessed for swelling were shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP joints 1-5, PIP joints 1-5, and knee on both sides of the body. The sum of swollen joints, each, ranged from 0 to 28 with 0 as best possible health status and 28 as worst health status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Retrospective Chart Review on the Use of Biologics in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biologic Monotreatment and Biologic and Methotrexate (MTX) Combination Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
May 31, 2013
Registry last updated
Oct 5, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.