Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07307573

A Remotely Supported Pediatric Simulation-Based Procedural Training Curriculum for EMS Clinicians

The purpose of this study is to study and compare the efficacy and feasibility of a remotely supported simulation-based procedural curriculum for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

About this study

This study transitioned a previously reported, traditional, simulation-based training curriculum delivered by on-site pediatric simulation experts, into a program delivered by agency Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators (PECCs) supported by remote pediatric experts. The PECCs delivered the curriculum on site, and submitted first-person-view videos captured using a head-mounted camera of three procedures (bag-valve mask [BVM] ventilation, supraglottic device [SGD] insertion, and intraosseous [IO] catheterization) to pediatric education experts who provided scoring and feedback to the participants. The team tracked scores for all three procedures during the study period, compared scores to the previous study's, and solicited feedback from the PECCs and participants regarding these educational methods.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • all full-time or part-time EMS clinicians at the recruited agencies with BVM ventilation, SGD placement, and/or IO catheterization within their scope of practice

Exclusion criteria

  • no procedures of interest within scope of practice

Treatment and study plan

Education

Behavioral

pediatric emergency care coordinator provided education on each procedure performed

Primary outcomes

  1. intraosseous (IO) catheterization procedural outcome score

    Time frame: participants submitted 1-2 procedural videos based on training date during the 1-year study period

    The IO assessment tool was adapted from a previously validated simulation assessment tool. The score ranged from 0-12, with higher score demonstrating better performance. Participants submitted videos for review, which were scored by trained video reviewers using the assessment tool based on a corresponding data dictionary. Scores were then aggregated for analysis.

  2. bag valve mask (BVM) ventilation procedural outcome score

    Time frame: participants submitted 1-2 procedural videos based on training date during the 1-year study period

    The BVM assessment tool was adapted from a previously validated simulation assessment tool. The score ranged from 0-12, with higher score demonstrating better performance. Participants submitted videos for review, which were scored by trained video reviewers using the assessment tool based on a corresponding data dictionary. Scores were then aggregated for analysis.

  3. supraglottic device (SGD) placement procedural outcome score

    Time frame: participants submitted 1-2 procedural videos based on training date during the 1-year study period

    The SGD assessment tool was modified from a prior psychomotor examination checklist used by the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians. The score ranged from 0-14, with higher score demonstrating better performance. Participants submitted videos for review, which were scored by trained video reviewers using the assessment tool based on a corresponding data dictionary. Scores were then aggregated for analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. qualitative feedback regarding the curriculum

    Time frame: 1 year study period

    Feedback regarding the curriculum and educational experience was solicited via e-mail from participants at time of score reporting. Similar feedback was solicited via e-mail from educators throughout the study period during scheduling or troubleshooting correspondences. Comments were tabulated and summarized.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Other

Collaborators

  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Registry information

Official study title

A Remotely Supported Pediatric Simulation-Based Procedural Training Curriculum for EMS Clinicians: Partnering PECCs and Pediatric Experts at a Distance

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 29, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 29, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.