University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
NCT Number: NCT05444244
Despite well-documented disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (AD) prevalence, incidence, treatment, and mortality, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g. racial/ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged persons) are under-represented in clinical research. Existing research recruitment approaches are rarely designed to accommodate the priorities, concerns, and constraints relevant to participants from diverse backgrounds. To address these gaps, the investigators developed a research recruitment and engagement model, the Participant Oriented Research Engagement Model that centers and prioritizes relational aspects of research engagement, research participant needs, and systematically address socioeconomic determinants (i.e. unmet needs) that may limit accessibility of research. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of the Brain Health Community (BHC) Registry recruitment and engagement intervention, as compared to standard research recruitment strategies in modifying enrollment rates, participant satisfaction, and engagement. The investigators hypothesize that the BHC Registry will yield greater enrollment rates, higher satisfaction, and better ratings of relational engagement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Despite well-documented disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (AD) prevalence, incidence, treatment, and mortality, individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g. racial/ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged persons) are under-represented in clinical research. This poses a major barrier for efforts to better understand how disease risk factors and protective factors influence ADRD progression, and determinants of observed disparities. The National Institute on Aging has highlighted the need for development of an applied recruitment science to advance ADRD research, and enable systematic investigation of ADRD health disparities. Existing research on optimal ADRD research recruitment, engagement, and retention strategies is sparse, and focuses predominantly on individual-level characteristics, many of which may not be modifiable. Much of this research also overlooks the role of structural and social determinants, along with features of the study design in shaping participation decisions. People with ADRD and their caregivers commonly face financial, social, emotional, and logistical (i.e. time scarcity) consequences in relation to dementia, that disproportionately burden disadvantaged populations, yet are overlooked in research recruitment and engagement approaches. Existing research recruitment approaches are rarely designed to accommodate the priorities, concerns, and constraints relevant to participants from diverse backgrounds.
To address these gaps, the investigators developed a research recruitment and engagement model, the Participant Oriented Research Engagement Model that centers and prioritizes relational aspects of research engagement, research participant needs, and systematically address socioeconomic determinants (i.e. unmet needs) that may limit accessibility of research. Core constructs within the model are implemented within an applied research recruitment and engagement intervention, the Brain Health Community (BHC) Registry which applies systematic, tailored, and relational recruitment strategies and standardized connections to resources as an element of the research engagement process. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of the BHC Registry recruitment and engagement intervention, as compared to standard research recruitment strategies in modifying enrollment rates, participant satisfaction, and engagement. Each approach will be evaluated in a randomized trial to either BHC Registry or Standard Recruitment (SR). The relative benefit of these two approaches will be evaluated in a crossover trial of 60 participants who will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio. The investigators hypothesize that the BHC Registry will yield greater enrollment rates, higher satisfaction, and better ratings of relational engagement. Upon completion of the study, participants who received SR will be invited to participate in the BHC Registry.
Aim 1: To compare the BHC Registry to SR with respect to enrollment factors.
Aim 2: To compare the BHC Registry to SR with respect to participant satisfaction and relational engagement.
Hypothesis A: Tailored and relational recruitment strategies used in BHC Registry will result in higher enrollment, lower rates of refusal, and lower drop-out rates.
Hypothesis B: Tailored and relational recruitment strategies used in BHC Registry will result in higher participant satisfaction ratings.
Hypothesis C: Tailored and relational recruitment strategies used in the BHC Registry will yield better ratings of relational engagement.
Hypothesis D: Tailored and relational recruitment strategies used in BHC Registry will result in more favorable attitudes toward research as assessed by the Clinical Research Involvement Scale (CRIS)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for Participants Ages 40 or Older:
Inclusion criteria
for Caregiver Participants Ages 18 or Older:
Exclusion criteria
for Participants Ages 40 or Older:
Exclusion criteria
for Caregiver Participants Ages 18 or Older:
Other names: Brain Health Community Registry Recruitment Intervention
Time frame: 10 months
Number of participants enrolled in the Brain Health Community Registry
Time frame: 10 months
Number of participants in the Brain Health Community Registry
Time frame: 10 months
As part of the Brain Health Community Registry, participants were given the option to have a tailored list of resources created for them. Resources included transportation needs, caregiving support groups, resources related to eyeglasses or hearing aids, food, and other needs. This measure indicates the number of participants out of the 182 total participants that requested and received a personal resource list.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
Novel Approaches to Identifying and Engaging Disadvantaged Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in Clinical Research
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02795052
ALS, Alzheimer Disease
Westport, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06733714
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT04165213
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05916664
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details