Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07039383

A Real-world Study of the Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study.

The date of the initial tisa-cel infusion was defined as the index date. A baseline period from ALL diagnosis to the index date was used to capture patient characteristics including demographics, and disease and treatment history. The study period, defined as the period from tisa-cel infusion to the end of follow-up date, i.e. the last contact date on medical charts or death, whichever was earlier, was used to capture the clinical outcomes of tisa-cel among ALL patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with B-cell ALL.
  • Infusion of tisa-cel happened since December 2020 and at least 1 year before the chart abstraction date.

Exclusion criteria

None.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission Rate

    Time frame: Month 1 and Month 3

    Remission rate was defined as the best overall response as either complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) to tisa-cel.

    CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).

    CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood counts with or without blood transfusions independency.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients per Demographic Category

    Time frame: Baseline

    Demographic categories included:

    • Age group
    • Gender
    • Race
    • Ethnicity
    • Geographical region
    • Distance between residence and referral center (<5, 5-30, 30-60, >60 miles)
    • Type of insurance
  2. Demgraphics: Weight

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Number of Patients by Disease Characteristics Category

    Time frame: Baseline

    Disease characteristics categories included:

    • Relapse or refractory status before tisa-cel infusion
    • CD19 tumor expression among relapsed patients before tisa-cel infusion
    • Karnofsky or Lansky performance score (PS)
    • Lymphoblast proportion in bone marrow (<5%, >= 5%)
    • Conditions of interest before tisa-cel infusion
    • Patients with relapse before tisa-cel infusion
    • Number and type of relapse before tisa-cel infusion (any bone marrow and/or central nervous system relapse)
    • Cytogenic testing performed at tisa-cel infusion
    • Cytogenic abnormalities at tisa-cel infusion
    • Number of distinct cytogenic abnormalities (1, 2, 3, 4+)
    • Comorbidities at tisa-cel infusion
    • Remission status at time of tisa-cel infusion

    The Karnofsky and Lansky PS are measures of functional impairment. They run from 0 to 100, where 0 is death and 100 is normal health. The Karnofsky scale is for patients aged 16 years or older. The Lansky scale is for patients younger than 16 years old.

  4. Number of Patients by Treatment Characteristics Category

    Time frame: Baseline

    Treatment characteristic categories included:

    • Treatments of interest before tisa-cel infusion
    • Number of prior lines of treatment category (1 to 7)
    • Received prior allogenic stem cell transplant (alloSCT)
    • Number of alloSCT received (0, 1, 2)
    • Year of initial tisa-cel infusion
    • Bridging treatment agent received before tisa-cel infusion
    • Lymphodepleting regimen received before tisa-cel infusion
    • Type of tisa-cel infusion dose received (single, multiple)
    • Weight at tisa-cel infusion (<= 50 kilograms [kg], >50 kg)
  5. Lymphoblast Proportion in Bone Marrow Before Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. ALL Disease Duration at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse

    Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  8. Number of Patients by Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse

    Time frame: Baseline

    Time intervals: <18 months, 18-36 months, and >36 months.

  9. Time From Most Recent Relapse to Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  10. Number of Lines of Treatment Prior to Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Loss of Follow-up or Death due to Any Cause

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  12. Time From Leukapheresis to Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  13. Number of Doses for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

    Number of doses for initial infusion was measured among those who received multiple doses.

  14. Weight Adjusted Transduced Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed 50 kg or Less at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

  15. Total Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed More Than 50 kg at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Number of Patients by Conditions Experienced After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  17. Number of Patients by Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status

    Time frame: Month 1 and Month 3

    Bone marrow MRD is a measure of the number of cancer cells remaining in the body after treatment. The number of patients overall with bone marrow MRD negative and those who achieved CR or CRi response with bone marrow MRD negative after tisa-cel infusion was measured. Bone marrow MRD negative was based on clinical assessment by the investigator.

    CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).

    CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood count with or without blood transfusions independency.

  18. Duration of Remission (DOR)

    Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

    DOR was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to ALL.

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease
  19. Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

    Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

    RFS was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to any cause.

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease
  20. Event-free Survival (EFS)

    Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

    EFS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the earliest of the following events: death due to any cause, relapse, treatment failure (i.e., no response), or new anticancer therapy for ALL (i.e., treatments other than tisa-cel or SCT).

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease
  21. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

    OS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the date of death due to any cause.

  22. Number of Patients who had AlloSCT After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Patient counts were categorized by:

    • Pre-planned/not pre-planned at time of tisa-cel infusion
    • Achieved/had not achieved B-cell recovery at time of alloSCT
    • Unknown B-cell recovery status
    • Did not have B-cell aplasia
    • alloSCT received within 12 months after tisa-cel infusion
    • Relapse status after tisa-cel infusion before alloSCT
  23. Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Subsequent AlloSCT

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  24. Number of Patients by Tisa-cel Reinfusion Received After Initial Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Patient counts were categorized by:

    • Received/did not receive reinfusion
    • Received infusion within 12 months after initial infusion
    • Reason for reinfusion
  25. Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to Tisa-cel Reinfusion

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  26. Number of Patients by Type of new Anticancer Therapy (Other Than AlloSCT or Reinfusion) Received After Tisa-cel infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  27. Number of Patients by B-cell Aplasia Status After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    B-cell aplasia status included:

    • Experienced B-cell aplasia
    • Recovered from B-cell aplasia
  28. Time from Tisa-cel Infusion to B-cell Aplasia

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  29. Number of Patients by use of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Replacement Therapy Among Those who Experienced B-cell Aplasia

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Ig replacement therapy use was categorized as follows:

    • Received Ig replacement therapy
    • Received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy
    • Ongoing IVIG therapy
    • Stopped IVIG therapy
    • Received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy
    • Ongoing SCIG therapy
    • B-cell aplasia recovered
  30. Average Dose of Ig Replacement Therapy

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.

  31. Duration of Ig Replacement Therapy

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.

  32. Rate of Maintenance of B-cell Aplasia

    Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30

  33. Number of Patients by Hospitalizations at Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Baseline

    Hospitalization categories included not hospitalized, hospitalized for Tisa-cel infusion, and subsequently admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).

  34. Length of Stay in Hospital for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  35. Number of Patients by Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    Hospitalization categories included hospitalized, not hospitalized, and first hospitalization.

  36. Number of Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  37. Length of Stay in Hospital After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  38. Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to the First Hospitalization

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  39. Number of Patients by Primary Reason for the First Hospitalization

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  40. Number of Patients by ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

    ICU admission categories included admitted to ICU, not admitted to ICU, and first ICU admission.

  41. Number of ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  42. Length of Stay per ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

  43. Number of Patients by Primary Reason for ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Kymriah Real-world Effectiveness in ALL (KareALL): a Retrospective Chart Review Study of Tisagenlecleucel-treated ALL Patients

Acronym: KareALL

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jun 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.