Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07302360

A Real-World Study of Guselkumab in Chinese Participants With Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this study is to assess the measurable changes in health, function, or quality of life (clinical outcomes) after receiving guselkumab in real-world clinical practice amongst Chinese participants with ulcerative colitis (UC; a long-term disease of the large intestine in which the lining of the colon [part of large intestine] becomes inflamed and develops tiny open ulcers), who have not received biologic therapy (a medicine made from living organisms or their components) previously.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active UC, defined as: a) baseline modified Mayo score of 4 to 9; b) screening endoscopy with Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) greater than or equal to (>=) 2; c) Mayo rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) >= 1 at baseline
  • Eligible for advanced treatment and initiate guselkumab therapy per participating physician decision in accordance with product package insert
  • Have no prior exposure to advanced therapies (bio-naive), such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists, anti-integrin agents, anti-interleukin (IL) agents, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors or their corresponding generics and biosimilars, per participating physician assessment
  • Participant (and/or their legally-acceptable representative where applicable) must sign an informed consent form (ICF) allowing source data verification in accordance with local requirements

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute severe UC or infectious colitis or other conditions when patients is likely to require a colectomy
  • Contraindicated to guselkumab per the label
  • Currently enrolled in or plan to participate in any other clinical trials from signing informed consent to the final dose administration of guselkumab
  • Participants who will be receiving guselkumab therapy combined with a second advanced therapy
  • Participants with a history of colectomy and/or pouch

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Clinical response is defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score by >= 30 percent (%) and >= 2 points, with either a >=1 decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) or an RBS of 0 or 1. Partial Mayo score is a non-invasive clinical measure for determining the severity of UC. The total score falls between 0 and 9, where higher score indicates more severity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

    Clinical response is defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo score by >= 30 % and >= 2 points, with either a >=1 decrease from baseline in RBS or an RBS of 0 or 1. Partial Mayo score is a non-invasive clinical measure for determining the severity of UC. The total score falls between 0 and 9, where higher score indicates more severity.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Response at Week 2

    Time frame: At Week 2

    Symptomatic response is defined as a decrease from induction baseline in the patient reported outcome (PRO)-2 by at least 30% and at least 1 point, with either at least 1-point decrease from induction baseline in RBS or an RBS of 0 or 1. PRO-2 consists of the two components (rectal bleeding and stool frequency). The stool frequency subscale is rated as follows: 0 (normal stool frequency), 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), 2 (3-4 stools more than normal), and 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). The rectal bleeding subscale is rated as: 0 (no blood), 1 (streaks of blood less than half the time), 2 (obvious blood most of the time), and 3 (blood alone). Higher score indicates more severity in symptoms.

  3. Mean Change from Baseline in Stool Frequency Subscore (SFS) Over Week 2

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 2

    SFS is a component of PRO-2. The stool frequency subscale is rated as follows: 0 (normal stool frequency), 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), 2 (3-4 stools more than normal), and 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). Higher score indicates more severity in symptoms.

  4. Mean Change from Baseline in RBS Over Week 2

    Time frame: From Baseline to Week 2

    RBS is a component of PRO-2. The rectal bleeding subscale is rated as: 0 (no blood), 1 (streaks of blood less than half the time), 2 (obvious blood most of the time), and 3 (blood alone). Higher score indicates more severity in symptoms.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Clinical remission is defined as a partial Mayo score less than or equal to (<=) 2 with no sub-score greater than (>) 1. Partial Mayo score is a non-invasive clinical measure for determining the severity of UC. The total score falls between 0 and 9, where higher score indicates more severity.

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Symptomatic Remission at Week 2

    Time frame: At Week 2

    Symptomatic remission as measured by PRO-2 is defined as a SFS of 0 or 1 and an RBS of 0, where the SFS has not increased from induction baseline. The SFS is rated as follows: 0 (normal stool frequency), 1 (1-2 stools more than normal), 2 (3-4 stools more than normal), and 3 (5 or more stools more than normal). The RBS is rated as: 0 (no blood), 1 (streaks of blood less than half the time), 2 (obvious blood most of the time), and 3 (blood alone). Higher score indicates more severity in symptoms.

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving Steroid-Free Remission at Week 12, 24 and 48

    Time frame: At Weeks 12, 24 and 48

    Steroid-free remission is defined as clinical remission with no use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days. Clinical remission is defined as partial Mayo score <= 2 with no sub-score >1.

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

    Sustained remission is defined as clinical remission maintenance status at post-induction (Week 12) in participants who had attained clinical remission by the end of the 12-week induction therapy.

  9. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement (Healing) at Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

    Endoscopic improvement (healing) is defined as endoscopic remission Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) of 0 or 1. The MES consists of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment, each subscore is graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) with higher scores indicate more severe disease.

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission (Normalization) at Week 24 and Week 48

    Time frame: At Week 24 and Week 48

    Endoscopic remission (normalization) is defined as an MES of 0. The MES consists of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment, each subscore is graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) where higher scores indicate more severe disease.

  11. Percentage of Participants Discontinuing from Treatment

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Treatment discontinuation is defined as discontinuation of guselkumab treatment for any reason.

  12. Percentage of Participants Switching from Treatment

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Treatment switch is defined as initiation of another medication for UC treatment after guselkumab discontinuation.

  13. Time to Treatment Discontinuation

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Time to treatment discontinuation is defined as the time from the guselkumab start date to the time of treatment discontinuation.

  14. Time to Treatment Switch

    Time frame: Up to Week 48

    Time to treatment switch is defined as the time from the guselkumab start date to the time of initiation of a new treatment other than guselkumab.

  15. Percentage of Participants on Guselkumab Dosing Schedules of 200 Milligrams (mg) Once Every 4 Weeks (q4w) or 100 mg Once Every 8 Weeks (q8w)

    Time frame: From Baseline through Week 12 to Week 48

    The percentage of participants on guselkumab dosing schedules of 200mg q4w or 100 mg q8w will be assessed. For each dosing schedule, the percentage will be calculated by dividing the number of participants receiving the specific dosing regimen by the number of participants still being followed up at those time points, multiplied by 100%.

  16. Percentage of Participants Undergoing Dose Escalation/ De-Escalation

    Time frame: Week 12 up to Week 48

    Percentage of participants having dose escalation/ de-escalation during maintenance treatment will be assessed. The percentage will be calculated by dividing the number of participants having dosage adjustment (that is, dose escalation/de-escalation) after Week 0 at any visit time point compared to his/her previous recorded administration dosage, multiplied by 100%.

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Remission

    Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    IBDQ remission is defined as total IBDQ score >= 170. The IBDQ is a validated, 32-item, self-reported questionnaire for patients with inflammatory bowel disease that will be used to evaluate the disease-specific health-related quality of life (QoL) across 4 dimensional scores: bowel symptoms (loose stools, abdominal pain), systemic functions (fatigue, altered sleep pattern), social function (work attendance, need to cancel social events), and emotional function (anger, depression, irritability). Scores range from 32 to 224, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

  18. Change from Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Change in CRP levels since guselkumab initiation will be reported.

  19. Change from Baseline of Fecal Calprotectin Levels

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Change in fecal calprotectin levels since guselkumab initiation will be reported.

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving CRP Normalization

    Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Normalization of CRP is defined as reduction of less than or equal to 5 microgram per liter (mg/L) at weeks 12, 24 and 48 since baseline. Percentage of participants with abnormal CRP at baseline achieving CRP normalization will be reported.

  21. Percentage of Participants Achieving Fecal Calprotectin (FCP) Normalization

    Time frame: At Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48

    Normalization of fecal calprotectin is defined as reduction of <= 250 microgram per gram (mcg/g) at weeks 12, 24 and 48 since baseline. Percentage of participants with abnormal FCP at baseline achieving fecal calprotectin normalization will be reported.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Study Contact

CONTACT

[email protected]

844-434-4210

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xian-Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Guselkumab Real-world Effectiveness Among Bio-NaÏve Patients With Moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis in China: A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Prospective Study

Acronym: GENIUS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Dec 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.