University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
NCT Number: NCT01713452
Stoma closure has been associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI). The rate for SSI following stoma closure has been noted to be 7-41%; a rate that is higher than expected for a clean-contaminated operative classification. The ideal stoma site closure technique is still debated in the current literature. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of SSI following two different stoma closure techniques, primary closure versus a skin approximating purse string closure, in a multi-center randomized controlled trial. The investigators hypothesize that purse string closure technique will have a lower rate of SSI than primary closure technique.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
The investigators will randomize ileostomy takedown patients to either a primary closure or purse string closure technique intraoperatively. Surgeons at both the University of Minnesota and the CHUV hospital in Switzerland will participate in the this study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects eligible are those with either a colostomy or ileostomy (end or loop) who are deemed by their surgeon to be appropriate candidates for ostomy closure. There will be no limitations based upon initial indication for formation of the ostomy. Indications for initial ostomy formation for fecal diversion can include: infection (e.g. diverticulitis) and protection of an anastomosis. (following resection for inflammatory bowel disease, benign diseases, or cancer)
Exclusion criteria
Subjects will be excluded from the study if:
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
Evidence of delayed wound-healing at stoma takedown site
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
We are measuring subject satisfaction with wound healing and cosmetic outcome
University of Minnesota
Other
A Randomized Trial of Ostomy Closure Techniques: An Outcomes Evaluation of Primary Closure Versus Pursestring Closure
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02992951
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05684198
Digestive System Diseases, Infections
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03887299
Behavior, Cesarean Section Complications
Galveston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02127970
Abscess, Cellulitis
Montgomery, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details