bicalutamide
DrugGiven PO
Other names: Casodex
NCT Number: NCT05521698
This phase I trial evaluates the effects of bicalutamide, compared to no study drug (NSD), on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) protein expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bicalutamide is in a class of medications called androgen receptor inhibitors. It works by blocking the effects of androgen (a male reproductive hormone) to stop the growth and spread of tumor cells. Previous studies have suggested that expression of a protein called EGFR on tumor cells is related to bladder cancer disease progression. This trial may help doctors evaluate if bicalutamide has any effect on EGFR expression in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 1
University of Arizona Cancer Center - Prevention Research Clinic, Tucson, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor (measured as a ratio relative to urothelium and lamina-propria specific markers) in participants treated with anti-androgen therapy versus (vs.) participants given NSD.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine effect of bicalutamide on EGFR expression (by rtPCR) in the subgroup of patients whose normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor expresses the androgen receptor (AR) (at least "1" by immunohistochemistry [IHC] score).
II. To correlate AR expression in adjacent urothelium (by IHC score) with EGFR expression by rtPCR in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
III. Comparison of toxicity in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Comparison of AR and EGFR (and possibly phosphorylated EGFR [pEGFR]) staining levels (low, moderate, high; by immunocytology) in pre-treatment vs. post-treatment bladder wash cytology.
II. To compare expression of direct androgen response gene (ADAR)-2 measured by rtPCR in normal appearing adjacent (to tumor) urothelium that does and does not express AR (by IHC), in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
III. Ki-67 expression (by IHC) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
IV. Subgroup analysis of Ki-67 expression in the AR+ subgroup. V. Differences in expression of AR, EGFR, pEGFR, and Ki-67 (by semi-quantitative IHC) in tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
VI. Comparison of demographics of two groups. VII. Change in EGFR expression by rt-PCR in tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
VIII. Morbidities of treatment (breast tenderness, sexual or urinary side effects, seizure[s], depression, abnormal liver function tests [LFTs]).
IX. Comparison of pre vs. post intervention urinary biomarkers (CxBladderTM) in both groups, examining the 5 RNAs (by rtPCR) that make up the test, both as a group and each RNA separately.
X. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation analysis in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks from neighboring normal urothelium and tumor tissue in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
XI. Define changes in the tumor immune microenvironment pre- and post-bicalutamide through liquid biopsies of blood and urine using high-dimensional flow cytometry.
XII. Analyze tumor (biopsy specimen) immune microenvironment via multiplex immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics.
XIII. Compare AR, EGFR, and pEGFR in biopsies of tumors done at index cystoscopy vs. TURBT in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD. (Optional) XIV. Other exploratory markers such as changes in the urinary microbiome in bladder cancer participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients receive bicalutamide orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-21. Patients undergo TURBT on day 21. Up to 28 days of bicalutamide prior to TURBT is permitted in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo tumor biopsy at baseline.
ARM 2: Patients receive NSD PO QD on days 1-21. Patients undergo TURBT on day 21. Up to 28 days of NSD prior to TURBT is permitted in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo blood and urine sample collection throughout the study. Patients may optionally undergo tumor biopsy at baseline.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up 20-30 days after TURBT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: Casodex
Undergo tumor biopsy
Other names: Biopsy, BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx
Undergo blood and urine sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo TURBT
Other names: Transurethral resection (TURBT), TURBT
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be analyzed as a continuous variable. A two-sample t-test will be conducted to test whether there are significant differences of the log-transformed EGFR expression level (measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [rtPCR]) in normal appearing urothelium adjacent to tumor in participants treated with anti-androgen therapy versus (vs.) NSD participants. In case the normality assumption of the two-sample t-test does not hold, Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be performed as a sensitivity analysis. Considering androgen receptor (AR) status can be a treatment effect modifier, a regression analysis will also be performed with the log-transformed EGFR expression level as the outcome and treatment status (bicalutamide or NSD), AR status, and treatment-AR interaction as the predictors.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
A two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be conducted to compare the difference of EGFR expression in AR positive participants treated with and without bicalutamide.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will evaluate the correlation between AR expression in adjacent urothelium with EGFR expression. Pearson correlation and Spearman's rank correlation will be calculated between the AR expression and EGFR expression.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Toxicity of treatment may include breast tenderness, sexual or urinary side effects, seizure(s), depression, abnormal liver function tests. Descriptive statistics will be provided for these outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Morbidities of treatment may include breast tenderness, sexual or urinary side effects, seizure(s), depression, abnormal LFTs. Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Comparison of pre vs. post intervention urinary biomarkers (CxBladderTM) in both groups, examining the 5 ribonucleic acids (RNAs) (by rtPCR) that make up the test, both as a group and each RNA separately. Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Extracted from fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) blocks from neighboring normal urothelium and tumor tissue in participants treated with or without bicalutamide. Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
The tumor immune microenvironment will be analyzed via multiplex immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics. Assessments will include CD8+ T-cell functional markers: TCF1/Tcf7 of CD44+, CD62L, PD-1, TIM3 and SLAMF6. Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Time frame: At index cystoscopy and TURBT
Optional biopsy tissue will be used to compare AR, EGFR, and pEGFR in biopsies of tumors done at index cystoscopy vs. transurethral resection of bladder tumor in participants randomized to bicalutamide versus NSD.
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Will be summarized by descriptive statistics such as rates and proportions and compared between NSD and bicalutamide using nonparametric tests such as the Kruskal-Wallis test.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06770582
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05483868
Carcinoma, Female Urogenital Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06503614
Carcinoma, Female Urogenital Diseases
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05962541
Carcinoma, Female Urogenital Diseases
Rome, Lazio, Italy
View Trial Details