Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05985499

A Randomized Parallel-controlled Study Comparing the Ileostomy "Dumpling Suture Method" With Traditional Suture Method in Rectal Anterior Resection Surgery With Specimen Extraction Via Stoma

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES), which involves obtaining specimens from the abdominal cavity without any incisions, has attracted much attention in recent years, and it has been widely popularized in the treatment of rectal cancer because of its postoperative non-incision, advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery, and postoperative aesthetics. Anastomotic fistula is a serious complication of rectal cancer surgery. For patients at high risk of anastomotic fistula, prophylactic ileostomy is often performed intraoperatively to divert feces and protect the anastomosis. For such patients, rectal anterior resection surgery with specimen extraction via stoma (NOSES with specimen extraction via stoma) is usually performed, borrowing a prophylactic stoma incision to retrieve the specimen, and also realizing the absence of additional abdominal incision. However, this procedure is prone to stoma infection and has a high complication rate (20-40%), which limits the popularization of NOSES surgery and is an urgent clinical problem. Our center has proposed a new stoma closure method (Dumpling Suture Method), which reduces the size of the incision by folding the suture to achieve the effect of hiding the skin incision and reduce stoma infection. In our previous study, 17 cases of the new procedure were completed in our center, and 25 patients with stoma closure by the traditional method were included in the same period for control purposes. After six months of follow-up, we found that the "dumpling suture method" significantly reduced the incidence of stoma complications compared with the traditional suture method (5.8% vs. 36%), and no additional adverse effects were observed. This is a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical study. The primary endpoint is stoma complication rate within 30 days postoperatively. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the "dumpling suture method " compared with the traditional stoma suture in reducing postoperative stoma complications through a randomized parallel controlled clinical trial, which is of great significance for the improvement of the rectal NOSES procedure and the reduction of the incidence of stoma complications.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200092, China

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for rectal anterior resection surgery with specimen extraction via stoma
  • No serious systemic infection or immunosuppression
  • Patients aged above 18 years and below 100 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status: 0-1
  • Expected survival time > 6 months
  • Patient participate voluntarily and sign an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not require a prophylactic stoma after preoperative evaluation
  • Any skin infectious disease of the abdominal wall
  • Surgery less than 1 month from the last chemotherapy
  • Previously underwent any other stoma surgery
  • Presence of a serious active or uncontrollable infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Previous history of definite neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Patient may not be able to complete the study for other reasons, or who the investigator believes should not be included

Treatment and study plan

Suturing of ileostomy using "Dumpling suture method"

Procedure

Suturing of ileostomy using "Dumpling suture method"

Suturing of ileostomy using Traditional suture method

Procedure

Suturing of ileostomy using Traditional suture method

Primary outcomes

  1. Complication rate of stoma

    Time frame: Within one month after surgery

    Observe and assess for stoma complications

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stoma DET(Discoloration,Erosion and Tissue overgrowth) score

    Time frame: Within one month after surgery

    Measure the state of the skin around the stoma and the corresponding lesion area, ranging from 0-15, higher scores mean a worse outcome of stoma

  2. Stoma Pain Score

    Time frame: Within one month after surgery

    Measurement of stoma pain level using numerical rating scale,ranging from 0-10, higher scores mean a worse outcome of pain

  3. Quality of life scale score for patients with stoma

    Time frame: Day 30 after surgery

    Measurement of quality of life for patients with stoma using City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire (CHO-QOL-OQ), ranging from 0-3200, higher scores mean a worse outcome of quality of life

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Parallel-controlled Study Comparing the Ileostomy "Dumpling Suture Method" With Traditional Suture Method in Rectal Anterior Resection Surgery With Specimen Extraction Via Stoma (NOSES With Specimen Extraction Via Stoma)

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.