Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07511374

A Randomized Controlled Ecological Momentary Intervention to Improve Digital Self-Regulation and Well-Being

The primary objective of this study is to examine whether an ecological momentary intervention (EMI), combining behavioral self-monitoring (screen time screenshot uploads) and structured reflection, can enhance metacognitive awareness and metacognitive regulation in the context of recreational screen time among young adults.

A secondary objective is to investigate whether improvements in metacognitive processes are associated with subsequent changes in behavioral and psychological outcomes, including recreational screen time (RST), stress, and life satisfaction.

Furthermore, this study aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms through which the intervention exerts its effects by integrating a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design with intensive longitudinal (daily diary) data.

Specifically, the study addresses the following research questions:

RQ1 (Primary Intervention Effect on Metacognition): Does the EMI lead to higher levels of daily metacognitive awareness and metacognitive regulation (planning, monitoring, and evaluation) compared to the control group? RQ2 (Within-person Associations): At the within-person level, do day-to-day fluctuations in metacognitive awareness and regulation predict same-day and next-day changes in recreational screen time, stress, and life satisfaction? RQ3 (Mediating Mechanism): Do increases in metacognitive awareness and regulation mediate the effects of the EMI on recreational screen time, stress, and life satisfaction? RQ4 (Between-person Effects): At the between-person level, do individuals in the intervention group exhibit higher average levels of metacognitive awareness and regulation, as well as lower recreational screen time and stress and higher life satisfaction, compared to those in the control group?

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Hong Kong Polythechnic University

Hong Kong, Select An Option…

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Shiyun Chen, PhD Candidate

CONTACT

[email protected]

46744938

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 25 years old.
  • Own and regularly use a smartphone.
  • Report an average daily recreational screen time of at least 3 hours on weekdays or 4 hours on weekends, based on self-report (Zablotsky et al., 2025).
  • Be able to access their device's built-in screen time tracking function (or equivalent system-level usage report) and upload screenshots when required.
  • Be willing and able to complete daily surveys throughout the full study period.
  • Indicate motivation to reduce or regulate their recreational screen use.

Exclusion criteria

  • Outside the age range of 18-25 years.
  • Do not own a smartphone or do not use it regularly.
  • Report average daily recreational screen time below 3 hours on weekdays and below 4 hours on weekends.
  • Are unable to access device-based screen time tracking functions or cannot provide valid screenshots when required.
  • Are unwilling or unable to complete daily surveys across the study period (e.g., anticipated non-compliance, scheduling constraints).
  • Do not express motivation to reduce or regulate their recreational screen use.

Treatment and study plan

Ecological Momentary Intervention

Behavioral

A composite ecological momentary intervention that integrates behavioral self-monitoring and metacognitive reflection.

Specifically, each day participants will:

  • Upload a screenshot of their device-recorded screen time (e.g., iOS Screen Time or Android Digital Wellbeing), serving as a form of behavioral self-monitoring.
  • Complete structured reflection prompts designed to activate metacognitive processes, including reflection on:

(1) total recreational screen time, (2) usage contexts (e.g., situations or triggers), (3) awareness of potential overuse, and (4) use of regulation strategies (e.g., planning, monitoring, evaluation).

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Metacognitive Awareness

    Time frame: 14-day dairy

    Daily Metacognitive Awareness assesses the extent to which participants were consciously aware of their motivations and tendencies regarding recreational screen use on that day, which adapted from metacognitive awareness dimension in Metacognition about Regulating Recreational Screen Time Scale (McRST). Sample items include: "Today, I was aware of why I wanted to use my device for recreational purposes." Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater daily metacognitive awareness.

  2. Daily Recreational Screen Time

    Time frame: 14-day dairy

    Daily Recreational Screen Time is assessed using both subjective self-reports and objective device-recorded data in order to enhance measurement validity and reduce recall bias. Recreational screen time is defined as non-work and non-study device use, including activities such as social media browsing, video streaming, gaming, and other entertainment-related engagement.

  3. Metacognitive skills

    Time frame: baseline, day 15 (t1)

    Metacognitive skills will be assessed using the Metacognition about Regulating Recreational Screen Time Scale (Mc-RST). The scale captures individuals' knowledge, beliefs, and perceived efficacy regarding their ability to regulate recreational screen use. Participants rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive awareness and perceived regulatory capacity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Daily Stress

    Time frame: 14-day dairy

    Daily Stress is assessed using brief items adapted to capture day-specific perceived stress. Participants indicate the extent to which statements such as "Today, I felt stressed," "Today, I felt overwhelmed," and "Today, I found it difficult to cope with daily demands" describe their experience. Responses are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much), with higher scores indicating greater daily stress.

  2. Daily Life Satisfaction

    Time frame: 14-day dairy

    Daily Life Satisfaction captures participants' cognitive evaluation of their day. Participants respond to items such as "Overall, I was satisfied with today," "Today was close to my ideal day," and "I feel positive about how today went." Responses are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater daily life satisfaction.

  3. Internet addiction

    Time frame: baseline, day 15 (t1)

    Internet addiction will be measured using the revised Chinese Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R; Bai & Fan, 2005), which assesses core symptoms and related problems of excessive Internet use, including compulsive use, withdrawal, tolerance, interpersonal difficulties, and time management issues. Participants responded to items based on their experiences over the past year using a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater levels of problematic Internet use.

  4. Short-form video addiction

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Short-form video addiction will be assessed using the Bergen Short Video Addiction Scale (Qu et al., 2024), which captures key components of addictive behavior, including salience, mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse. Items were rated on a 5-point frequency scale, with higher scores indicating more severe short-form video addiction.

  5. Depressive symptoms

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Depressive symptoms will be measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Leung et al., 2020), which assesses the frequency of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, with higher total scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

  6. Anxiety symptoms

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7; He et al., 2010), which evaluates the frequency of anxiety-related symptoms over the past two weeks. Items were rated on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.

  7. Perceived stress

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Perceived stress will be measured using the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS; Yang & Huang, 2003), which assesses the extent to which individuals perceive their lives as unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded. Participants rated items on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.

  8. Self-control

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Self-control will be assessed using the Chinese version of the Self-Control Scale (SCS; Unger et al., 2016), which measures individuals' ability to regulate impulses and maintain goal-directed behavior. Items were rated on a 6-point scale, and higher average scores indicate stronger self-control capacity.

  9. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Life satisfaction will be measured using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985), which assesses global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction. Participants rated five items on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction.

  10. Fear of missing out (FoMO)

    Time frame: baseline; day 15(t1)

    Fear of missing out (FoMO) will be assessed using a validated FoMO scale (Przybylski et al., 2013; Li et al., 2019), which captures individuals' anxiety related to missing rewarding experiences or social interactions. Items were rated on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of FoMO.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Shiyun Chen, PhD Candidate

CONTACT

[email protected]

052-46744938

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Activating Metacognition in Daily Life: A Randomized Controlled Ecological Momentary Intervention to Improve Digital Self-Regulation and Well-Being

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 6, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.