University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
NCT Number: NCT01934530
This randomized controlled clinical pilot trial compared the efficacy of two soft tissue grafting methods for correcting esthetic discrepancies associated with non-molar implants in the maxilla. Specifically, it was explored whether defects treated with connective tissue grafts (SCTG) differed in their outcomes from defects treated with acellular dermal matrix allografts (ADM).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Thirteen patients who presented with implants displaying recession, thin biotype, concavity defects or a combination thereof associated with single crowned dental implants participated in this randomized control trial. The control group (N=7) received SCTG and the test group (N=6) received ADM, both under coronally positioned flaps. Data were collected before surgery, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery. Outcome measures included soft tissue, hard tissue, and esthetics parameters and psychosocial data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All patients were treated with infiltration of local anesthetic with vasoconstrictor if noted tolerable by the medical history. Surgeons were then notified if the patient was randomized to the test or control according to a blinded treatment assignment. In both groups, anesthesia was confirmed at the implant site and the palatal donor site if indicated. The recipient bed was then prepared.
Vertical incisions were made at the defect at line angles and horizontal incisions connected the two vertical releases intrasulcularly without involving the interdental papilla. The flap was reflected as a full thickness flap maintaining the integrity of the collagen attachment with de-epithelialization of papilla to allow for coronal advancement.
Time frame: 6 Months
Change in recession was recorded at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after grafting.
Time frame: 6 Months
At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after grafting, buccal concavities were measured.
Time frame: 6 Months
Tissue thickness was measured with a 25 endodontic file with rubber stopper at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after grafting.
Time frame: 6 Months
Implant esthetics were rated with written survey by both the subject and clinician.
Time frame: 6 months
Subjects completed questionnaires regarding their quality of life during the study by written survey.
University of Michigan
Other
Implant Associated Soft Tissue Defects in the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Control Trial Between Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.