Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00412971

A Randomized, Comparative Study of Hexvix Fluorescence Cystoscopy and Standard Cystoscopy in Patients With Non-invasive Bladder Cancer

The main objective of the study is to compare the 1-year recurrence rate of Hexvix assisted Transuretheral Resection of the Bladder (TURB) to standard white light TURB in patients with suspicion of non-invasive bladder cancer.

The hypothesis is to test whether the 1-year recurrence rate is different with Hexvix assisted TURB compared to standard white light TURB.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The main objective of the study is to compare the 1-year recurrence rate of Hexvix assisted Transuretheral Resection of the Bladder (TURB) to standard white light TURB in patients with suspicion of non-invasive bladder cancer.

Patients will be followed 4, 8 and 12 months after the initial TURB. This follow-up regimen is according to standard clinical practice in Denmark.

Recurrence of non-invasive bladder cancer is frequent, and this study is designed to investigate whether Hexvix assisted TURB can reduce the early recurrence compared to standard TURB

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with suspicion of non-invasive bladder cancer indicated for a transuretheral resection of the bladder
  • Above 18 years
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Gross hematuria. (Note: Gross hematuria is defined as a heavy bladder bleed resulting in marked amounts of blood in the urine, which may interfere with fluorescence cystoscopy. Where the bleed is light, the patient should not be excluded if in the investigator's opinion, rinsing during cystoscopy will alleviate the possible interference with fluorescence cystoscopy).
  • Patient with porphyria.
  • Known allergy to hexyl aminolevulinate hydrochloride or a similar compound.
  • Participation in other clinical studies with investigational drugs either concurrently or within the last 30 days.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding (all women of child-bearing potential must document a negative serum or urine pregnancy test at screening and use the contraceptive pill or intrauterine device (IUD) during the treatments and for at least one month thereafter).
  • Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.

Treatment and study plan

Hexvix

Drug

Single installation, TURB

Standard white light cystoscopy

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients With Histologically Confirmed Recurrence Within One 1 Year.

    Time frame: 1 year

    To compare tumour recurrence rates after standard (white light) and fluorescence guided transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) in patients with macroscopic non-muscle invasive bladder tumour.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients in the Hexvix Cystoscopy Group Who Had at Least One Additional Lesion Found by Hexvix Cystoscopy That Was Not Found by White Light Cystoscopy.

    Time frame: At day 0

  2. False Positive Detection Rate Patient Level

    Time frame: 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Photocure

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Comparative Phase III, 2-center Study of Hexvix Fluorescence Cystoscopy and Standard Cystoscopy in Patients With Non-invasive Bladder Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Dec 19, 2006
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.