Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05408247

A Randomised Controlled Trial of N-acetylcysteine for the Management of Alcohol Use Disorder

To explore the effectiveness of n-acetylcysteine in improving treatment outcomes for alcohol use disorder in a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Drug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Australia urgently requires new treatment strategies for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Although alcohol use disorders are a leading cause of preventable death in Australia, their treatment is generally not evidence based. The medications currently approved for use in Australia for the management of alcohol dependence have limited efficacy, and existing research does not address the heterogeneity of treatment response. Targeted personalised medicine addresses this heterogeneity with better medicine selection for patients based on their genotype and clinical comorbidities.

Following on from a recent pilot study conducted by CI Morley (NCT03879759), this project will evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of NAC, relative to a placebo, in heavy drinkers. We hypothesise that NAC-treated participants will be better able to achieve a reduction in heavy drinking. We will utilise a double-blind, randomised, controlled design. A sample of 280 individuals will receive 12 weeks of treatment with NAC (2400 mg/day) or placebo.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Alcohol Use Disorder according to the DSM-V criteria
  • A desire to reduce or stop drinking
  • Consumed at least 21 standard drinks per week or 2 heavy drinking days per week (HDD: ≥ 5 standard drinks/day for men; ≥4 for women) in the month prior to screening
  • Adequate cognition and English language skills to give valid consent and complete research interviews
  • Stable housing
  • Willingness to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or lactation (women will be advised to use reliable contraception during the trial and a pregnancy test will be performed were necessary)
  • Concurrent use of any psychotropic medication other than antidepressants (provided these are taken at stable doses for at least two months)
  • Any substance dependence other than nicotine
  • Clinically unstable systemic medical (e.g. cancer, end stage liver disease: e.g. MELD score ≥ 10) or psychiatric disorder (e.g. active psychosis, borderline personality disorder, active suicide risk: e.g. MADRAS item 10 score of 6) that precludes trial participation
  • Concurrent use of selenium, vitamin D or other anti-oxidants
  • Any alcohol pharmacotherapy within the past month

Treatment and study plan

N-acetyl cysteine

Drug

2400mg/day

Other names: NAC

Placebo

Drug

Matched placebo

Primary outcomes

  1. Heavy Drinking Days

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Reduction in Heavy Drinking Days (HDD; defined as 4 or more drinks in a day for women and five or more drinks in a day for men). This will be measured by the Timeline Follow Back and corroborated with Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) levels

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Liver Function

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Liver Function will be assessed through blood sample at baseline. We will measurement levels of enzyme gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT).

  2. Absence of any HDD

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by Timeline Follow Back and corroborated with Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) levels

Other outcomes

  1. Cost-Efficacy

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Examine the cost-efficacy between NAC and placebo from both health sector and societal perspectives. Measured by Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)

  2. Changes in Alcohol Craving

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Alcohol Craving Experience Questionnaire (ACEQ). Higher scores indicate more severe craving.

  3. Mean alcohol consumption per drinking day

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by Timeline Follow Back and corroborated with Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) levels

  4. Change in dependence Severity

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by the Alcohol Dependence Scale. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 47. A higher score indicates more severe dependence.

  5. Changes in Anxiety

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by cumulative scores on the DASS-21 Anxiety Scale. This scale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 21. A higher score indicates more anxiety.

  6. Changes in Depression

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by cumulative scores on the DASS-21 Depression Scale. This scale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 21. A higher score indicates greater depression.

  7. Changes in Stress

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Measured by cumulative scores on the DASS-21 Stress Scale. This scale has a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 21. A higher score indicates more stress.

  8. Sleep Disturbances

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the ISI (Insomnia Severity Index). This Index has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 28. The higher the score indicates more severe insomnia.

  9. Lifetime Consequences related to Drinking

    Time frame: Baseline

    To examine the adverse consequences a participant has experienced in their lifetime due to alcohol abuse in five areas: Interpersonal, Physical, Social, Impulsive, and Intrapersonal. This is measured using the Drinker Inventory of Consequences Lifetime Edition (DrInC-2L). Higher scores indicate more consequences.

  10. Recent Consequences related to Drinking

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    To examine the adverse consequences a participant has experienced in the last 3 months due to alcohol abuse in five areas: Interpersonal, Physical, Social, Impulsive, and Intrapersonal. This is measured using the Drinker Inventory of Consequences Recent Edition (DrInC-2R). Higher scores indicate more consequences.

  11. Changes in Consequences related to Drinking

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    To examine the change in adverse consequences a participant has experienced across the trial due to alcohol abuse in five areas: Interpersonal, Physical, Social, Impulsive, and Intrapersonal. This is measured by comparing the Drinker Inventory of Consequences Recent Edition (DrInC-2R) and the Drinker Inventory of Consequences Lifetime Edition (DrInC-2L). Higher scores indicate more consequences.

  12. Drinking Dairy

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Daily texts will be sent out to participants querying the amount of alcohol they have consumed. Participant responses to this will be recorded. This will be managed through SEMA software.

  13. Nicotine Dependence

    Time frame: Baseline

    Measured by the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). This test has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10. Higher scores indicate a more intense physical dependence on nicotine.

  14. Changes in Suicidal Ideation

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS). This scale has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 50. Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal thoughts.

  15. Changes in Information Gathering ability

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Caravan Spotter task of the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite (CIS). This measures information gathering through a perceptual decision making task whereby the target is initially ambiguous but progressively becomes clearer.

  16. Changes in Attentional Control

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Bounty Hunter task of the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite (CIS). This measures attentional control using a Go/No Go task.

  17. Changes in Monitoring of Feedback

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Prospectors Gamble task of the Cognitive Impulsivity Suite (CIS). This involves a probabilistic reverse learning task to measure monitoring of feedback.

  18. Irritability

    Time frame: Baseline

    As measured by the Brief Irritability Test (BITe). This test has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. Higher scores indicate greater irritability.

  19. Changes in Physical Activity

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    To assess an individuals' health based on the previous 7 days of physical activity. This is measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-Long). We are interested in whether across treatment, answers to this questionnaire will change.

  20. Changes in Quality of Life

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    To assess whether treatment can change quality of life as measured by the short form Health Survey (SF-36). This survey has 36 items that measure 8 domains of health, including: physical functioning, physical role limitations, bodily pain, general health perceptions, energy/vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations and mental health. The scores are transformed to range from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health).

  21. Changes in Quality of Life

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the EQ-5D-5L. This instrument measures 5 different domains of life including: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain is assessed by one question. This instrument has a minimum score of 0 (worst possible health) and a maximum score of 1 (best possible health).

  22. Changes in ability to inhibit prepotent responses

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Stroop Colour Word Test. This test measures ability to inhibit prepotent responses and processing speed. This is assessed through the time it takes for an individual to appropriately select an incongruent response. For example, selecting "black" for the word "black" that is coloured in "green". Higher scores indicate worse performance.

  23. Changes in processing speed

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Trail Making Task (TMT). This test measures the ability to an individual to process visual stimuli, as measured in time. In the TMT Part A, individuals are instructed to draw a line between numbers, 1-2-3-4-5. Higher time indicates slower processing speed. In the TMT Part B individuals are instructed to switch between drawing lines between numbers and letters, for example 1-A-2-B-3-C. Higher time indicates worse processing speed and switching ability.

  24. Changes in DSM-5 PTSD symptomology

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the PCL-5. This self-report questionnaire lists 20-items that assess DSM-5 PTSD criteria. A higher score indicates greater severity

  25. Changes in use of Health Services

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    As measured by the Brief Health Services Use Questionnaire. This questionnaire assesses Health Service Use across the last 3 months.

  26. Hangover Diary

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    Daily texts will be sent out to participants querying the hangover symptoms they are experiencing, if any. Participant responses to this will be recorded. This will be managed through SEMA software.

  27. Using Redox Markers to predict treatment response

    Time frame: Baseline

    We will use blood samples collected at baseline to measure redox markers (GPxBC, GSHBC). At the end of treatment we will see whether these markers are predictive of treatment response

  28. Changes in Redox Markers

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    We will use blood samples collected at baseline and wk 12 to measure changes in redox markers (GPxBC, GSHBC)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Kirsten Morley, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

61295153636

Paul Haber, MBBS

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sydney

Other

Collaborators

  • Monash University

Registry information

Acronym: NAC-AUD

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 7, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 16, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.