Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03332199

A Psycho-educational Intervention for Symptom Cluster Management

The purpose of this study is to develop, implement and undertake a preliminary evaluation of a psychoeducational intervention for managing a cancer-related symptom cluster including pain, fatigue and sleep disturbance experienced by Vietnamese cancer patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hanoi Medical University

Hanoi, Vietnam

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are diagnosed with any type of cancer
  • Are over 18 years of age
  • Have finished the second chemotherapy cycle
  • Expected prognosis of at least 12 months
  • Karnofsky level of ≥ 60/100.
  • Report three symptoms: fatigue, pain and sleep disturbance at severity level of equal or above 3 during the past 7 days.
  • Ability to communicate in Vietnamese

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to complete questionnaires or participate in the intervention due to literacy level or communication impairment.
  • Have been diagnosed with major psychiatric morbidity such as suicidal tendencies or schizophrenia.

Involved in other clinical trials

Treatment and study plan

Psycho-educational intervention

Other

The total program, consisting of three intervention sessions, was given over a period of 3 weeks. The one face-to-face session of an-hour's duration was provided within a week of the chemotherapy cycle following recruitment. Two booster sessions of 20-30 minutes were then conducted by phone at one-week intervals after the first intervention session.

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom cluster

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The three-single item Numeric Analogue Scales (fatigue, pain and sleep disturbance) were used at baseline and 4 weeks of the intervention to assess the change of symptom severity at cluster levels. The scales consists of a number of symptoms rated on the 11-point scales, with 0 referring to "not present" and 10 referring to "as bad as you can imagine". The symptom cluster severity was evaluated by averaging symptom summary scores, with a summary higher score indicating greater symptom cluster severity.

  2. Fatigue

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) was used to assess the change of fatigue from baseline to 4 weeks of the intervention. The BFI consists of nine items assessing severity of fatigue in the past 24 hours (4 items) and its impacts on patients' different aspects of life, such as daily activity, emotional well-being, walking ability, work, and social interactions (5 items) on a 11-point scale. A summary higher score indicating greater fatigue severity and interference.

  3. Pain

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess the change of pain from baseline to 4 weeks of the intervention. The Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI) encompasses a 4-item pain severity subscale and a 7-item pain interference with daily activities subscale. Each item was rated on 11-point numerical rating scales. A summary higher score indicating greater pain severity and interference.

  4. Sleep disturbance

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was used to assess patients' sleep quality and pattern at baseline and 4 weeks of the intervention. The scale consists of 19 self-reported items categorised in 7 domains, including sleep quality, duration, sleep effectiveness, sleep disturbances, sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction over the last month. Possible scores range from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating greater sleep disturbance

Secondary outcomes

  1. Performance status

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Outcome measures included the Karnofsky Performance Scale at baseline and 4 weeks of the intervention. The scale ranges from 10 (moribund, fatal process progressing rapidly) to 100 (normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease).

  2. Depression and Anxiety

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to assess the change of depression and anxiety at baseline and 4 weeks of the intervention. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale includes 14 items separated into two subscales for anxiety (HADS-A: 7 items) and depression (HADS-D:7 items). For each sub-scale, the symptom is rated on a 22-point numerical scale which ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 21 (severe).

  3. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    The EQ-5D-5L was used to evaluate health-related quality of life at baseline and 4 weeks of the intervention. The EQ-5D-5L includes five aspects: "mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression". Each dimension has 5 levels: "no problem, slight problem, moderate problem, severe problem and extreme problem". Possible scores range from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicating poorer quality of five dimensions.

    The EQ VAS records patient's general health-related quality of life on a visual analogue scale, with 0 being "worst imaginable health state" and 100 equal "best imaginable health state".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hanoi Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Psycho-educational Intervention for Symptom Cluster Management Among Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy in Vietnam

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 6, 2017
Registry last updated
Nov 6, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.