Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01788124

A Prospective Trial Comparing Metal to Plastic Speculums for Patient Comfort

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comfort of two type of speculums used during routine gynecologic exam. Your treatment and medical care will not change because you are participating in this study. Your doctor will continue to make all decisions regarding your proper treatment and care.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

St John Macomb Oakland Hospital

Warren, Michigan, 48093, United States

About this study

Speculum examination is a common procedure in the gynecology clinic used for evaluation of numerous conditions such as vaginitis, and during cervical cytology screening (PAP smears). The speculum is inserted into the woman's vagina and used to keep the vaginal walls apart during exam and procedures. Each step of the examination with a speculum including insertion, manipulation during examination, and removal can cause discomfort for the patient. Fear of examination pain is considered one barrier to examination compliance. Any method to decrease discomfort during the exam would be considered beneficial to patient screening.

Typically two types of speculums are used in clinical practice, metal and plastic. There are advantages to both, and usage is usually predicated by physician preference. Previous studies have demonstrated a clear difference in patient comfort between metal speculums and newer dilating speculums such as the Vera scope (1). Clinical trials have also shown the benefit of using lubrication on metal speculums during routine exams (2). To date there are no clinical trails to examine the difference in patient comfort between metal and plastic bi-valve speculums.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any woman presenting to Great Lakes Obstetrics and Gynecology or Macomb Academic OB/GYN Clinic for a routine gynecological exam
  • Women ≥ 18 years of age
  • Women willing and able to give informed consent according to the guidelines established by the St John IRB

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients that can not or will not sign the informed consent document
  • Women whose English language skills are insufficient to understand the written informed consent or the post examination questionnaire.
  • Any woman for who use of a speculum is contraindicated.
  • Any woman with a condition that might alter pain perception
  • Current pain medication use
  • History of drug abuse
  • History of painful speculum examination
  • Menopausal women
  • Women who are pregnant or within 6 weeks of delivery
  • Women presenting with dyspareunia, vaginitis, vulvar pain or vulvar lesions
  • Women presenting for a vulvar, vaginal or uterine procedure.
  • Women who have had a previous abnormal PAP smear (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia >1)
  • Women ≤ 18 years of age.
  • Women who have never had vaginal intercourse.
  • Women who have never had a speculum examination in the past

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Discomfort VAS

    Time frame: up to one day post exam

    . Patients presenting for routine gynecological examination will be randomized to either plastic or metal speculum arm. Patient discomfort will be assessed using a self administered visual analogue scale (VAS). Patient comfort between groups will be assessed

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. John Health System, Michigan

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Metal to Plastic Speculums for Patient Comfort

Acronym: GYN

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Feb 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 11, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.